本文選題：甌海區(qū) + 違法建筑��； 參考：《福建農(nóng)林大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,伴隨著經(jīng)濟的日益繁榮,溫州市甌海區(qū)發(fā)展勢頭強勁。裹挾著發(fā)展大潮而來的違法建筑也拔地而起,這些違法建筑嚴重影響市容市貌和人民群眾的生活,嚴重妨礙了城市規(guī)劃的實施,阻礙城鎮(zhèn)化的順利推進,破壞城市的良性發(fā)展和正常秩序。分析違法建筑的成因、走出違建治理困境進而依法遏制違法建筑蔓延,已成為甌海區(qū)目前亟待解決的問題。本研究從違法建筑產(chǎn)生的原因和危害入手,運用帕累托改進原則以及加強公眾參與的善治理論,以甌海區(qū)違法建筑治理為研究對象,以甌海區(qū)違法建筑及其治理的現(xiàn)狀為基礎,剖析違法建筑產(chǎn)生的原因,分析當前甌海區(qū)違法建筑治理的困境,采用比較研究法、案例分析法、查閱文獻資料法等方法,對違法建筑的成因、危害、治理困境等進行綜合分析,得出違法建筑產(chǎn)生的根本原因是利益驅(qū)動、制度漏洞、監(jiān)管不力、風氣不正等,揭示違法建筑對當前城市建設、規(guī)劃管理以及人民生活帶來的危害,并形成具體有效措施,為甌海區(qū)違法建筑治理提供有效對策,從而找準癥結(jié),對癥下藥,標本兼治。本論文系統(tǒng)地闡述了甌海區(qū)違法建筑的現(xiàn)狀及其成因,對甌海區(qū)違法建筑治理工作體制、治理工作歷程進行了調(diào)查研究。同時,結(jié)合案例對甌海區(qū)違法建筑治理的困境進行分析,闡明;海區(qū)違法建筑治理的困境在于法律缺位與政策繁雜、交叉執(zhí)法與單一治理、暴力沖突與輿論攻擊等三個方面。最后,對違法建筑治理體現(xiàn)"善治"與"帕累托改進"原則進行思考,提出建立健全違法建筑治理法律制度體系、建立健全公眾參與治理的途徑、統(tǒng)籌兼顧公共利益與個人合法權益、杜絕資源浪費注重管理效率、加強行政執(zhí)法人員自我保護等對策。本文主要通過文獻查閱、比較研究、案例分析等方式獲取數(shù)據(jù)資料,對違法建筑和諧治理這一命題進行論證。在理論上,為研究中國違法建筑治理提供更有解釋力的框架,進一步探索違法建筑治理理論的內(nèi)涵和外延。在實踐上,為甌海區(qū)違法建筑治理提供更深入的經(jīng)驗和方法。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing prosperity of the economy, Wenzhou Ouhai District has a strong momentum of development. Illegal buildings with the tide of development also sprang up. These illegal buildings seriously affected the appearance of the city and the life of the people, seriously hindered the implementation of urban planning and hindered the smooth progress of urbanization. To destroy the benign development and normal order of the city. It is an urgent problem to analyze the causes of illegal construction, to get rid of the predicament of illegal building management and to curb the spread of illegal building according to law. This study starts with the causes and hazards of illegal buildings, applies the Pareto improvement principle and the theory of good governance to strengthen public participation, taking illegal building governance in Ouhai area as the research object, and based on the current situation of illegal building and its governance in Ouhai area. Analyzing the causes of illegal building, analyzing the predicament of illegal building management in Ouhai area at present, adopting the method of comparative research, case analysis, literature review, etc., to the cause and harm of illegal building, Through comprehensive analysis of the management difficulties, it is concluded that the fundamental causes of illegal construction are interest drive, system loopholes, weak supervision, unhealthy atmosphere, and so on. It reveals the harm that illegal construction brings to the current urban construction, planning and management, and people's life. And form concrete and effective measures to provide effective countermeasures for illegal building management in Ouhai area, so as to find the right key, prescribe the right medicine, and treat both symptoms and symptoms. This paper systematically expounds the current situation and causes of illegal building in Ouhai area, and investigates the working system and course of regulation of illegal building in Ouhai area. At the same time, by analyzing the plight of illegal building governance in Ouhai area, the paper expounds that the predicament of illegal building governance in Ouhai area lies in three aspects: lack of law and complicated policies, cross law enforcement and single governance, violent conflict and public opinion attack. Finally, the author thinks about the principles of "good governance" and "Pareto improvement" in illegal building governance, and puts forward the ways to establish and perfect the legal system of illegal building governance, and to establish and improve the public participation in governance. We should take into account the public interests and the legitimate rights and interests of individuals, put an end to the waste of resources and pay attention to the efficiency of management, strengthen the self-protection of administrative law enforcement personnel, and so on. This paper obtains the data by consulting literature, comparative study, case analysis and so on, and proves the proposition of harmonious governance of illegal building. Theoretically, it provides a more explanatory framework for the study of illegal building governance in China, and further explores the connotation and extension of illegal building governance theory. In practice, for the Ouhai area illegal building management to provide more in-depth experience and methods.
【學位授予單位】：福建農(nóng)林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F299.27

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周善東;;建立和諧城管綜合評價體系的初步探索[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2014年10期

2 安宇宏;;帕累托改進與帕累托最優(yōu)[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟管理;2013年03期

3 沈暉;陳瑤;;境外治理違法建筑的經(jīng)驗和啟示[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2012年06期

4 成協(xié)中;;“以拆違代征收”的制度邏輯及其根源[J];行政法論叢;2011年00期

5 徐林;黃萍;;公眾參與和城市管理——基于杭州市的實證研究[J];中共浙江省委黨校學報;2012年01期

6 張英周;;違章建筑的物權效力——以違章建筑的物權效力對租賃合同影響為視角[J];法律適用;2011年02期

7 夏雨;林沈節(jié);孫銘宗;;為有序而監(jiān)管——杭州市違法建筑綜合治理研究[J];公法研究;2011年01期

8 黃正興;;淺析城區(qū)規(guī)劃執(zhí)法[J];重慶行政(公共論壇);2010年06期

9 申東輝;;論廣州城市管理中的公眾參與[J];探求;2010年05期

10 劉淑妍;;當前我國城市管理中公眾參與的路徑探索[J];同濟大學學報(社會科學版);2009年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 裴元吉;論違法建筑的權利歸屬與利用問題[D];延邊大學;2009年

2 張立丹;論違法建筑[D];廈門大學;2009年

3 陳敬濤;違法建筑上的民事權利分析[D];重慶大學;2009年

4 葉青;違章建筑的否定與肯定[D];西南政法大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1952437