本文選題：準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施 + PPP　； 參考：《西安理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)新型城鎮(zhèn)化的加速推進(jìn),公眾對(duì)城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的需求逐漸增大。而我國(guó)的稅務(wù)制度改革削弱了地方政府的財(cái)政能力,快速增長(zhǎng)的公共服務(wù)需求與地方政府財(cái)政能力之間的矛盾日益凸顯。因此,將社會(huì)資本引入基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投資建設(shè)領(lǐng)域的PPP(Public-Private-Partnership)模式受到了政府部門的青睞,基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)領(lǐng)域PPP應(yīng)用日益廣泛。然而,PPP僅是提供基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施產(chǎn)品的選項(xiàng)之一,政府主觀偏好某一采購(gòu)模式或否定某一模式都難免武斷,采用科學(xué)的可量化的依據(jù)來(lái)判斷該模式是否可以采用、是否物有所值更具公平和客觀性(Value for Money,簡(jiǎn)稱VFM)。本文深入了解VFM基本理論,結(jié)合我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目具體特點(diǎn),構(gòu)建出針對(duì)我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目的VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)模型。首先,文章梳理了與PPP項(xiàng)目相關(guān)的VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)理論與現(xiàn)狀,針對(duì)我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目的運(yùn)作模式及特性,提出準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)的框架模型。然后介紹了該框架模型的三大組成部分:公共部門比較值(PSC)、PPP值(影子報(bào)價(jià)PPP值和實(shí)際報(bào)價(jià)PPP值)及內(nèi)部收益率(IRR),對(duì)各部分的組成及計(jì)算模型進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)闡述,從而構(gòu)成了完整的準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)模型。最后,將新構(gòu)建的準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)模型應(yīng)用于引漢濟(jì)渭配套水廠實(shí)際案例中,根據(jù)具體資料與數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,驗(yàn)證了該模型的可行性及適用性,為我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP模式的選擇提供了科學(xué)的量化依據(jù)。本文主要研究成果包括以下內(nèi)容:(1)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)模型可作為有效完善我國(guó)PPP項(xiàng)目前期決策體系的理論模型。該評(píng)價(jià)模型在PPP項(xiàng)目VFM定性評(píng)價(jià)基礎(chǔ)上,引入定量化決策依據(jù),克服了定性評(píng)價(jià)中的主觀偏差,與VFM定性評(píng)價(jià)相輔相成,有效完善了我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目前期決策體系,使準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目真正達(dá)到比傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式更有效率,大幅提高了我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的建設(shè)水平。(2)基于內(nèi)部收益率(IRR)的VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)方法被證明是緩解我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施項(xiàng)目落地難問(wèn)題的重要解決渠道。我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施中部分項(xiàng)目經(jīng)營(yíng)性收入難以覆蓋成本,難免降低社會(huì)資本參與積極性。本文制定PSC和IRR結(jié)合的VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)價(jià)方法,在檢驗(yàn)PPP項(xiàng)目是否比政府傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)營(yíng)更有效率的同時(shí),滿足了私營(yíng)企業(yè)實(shí)現(xiàn)自身利益的要求,可有效促進(jìn)合作雙方實(shí)現(xiàn)共贏。(3)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施PPP項(xiàng)目VFM定量評(píng)價(jià)關(guān)鍵參數(shù)的計(jì)算方法為政府制定PPP項(xiàng)目物有所值評(píng)價(jià)方法提供了思路。PPP運(yùn)用較早的國(guó)家對(duì)VFM已有部分研究,本文在借鑒他們方法的同時(shí),針對(duì)我國(guó)準(zhǔn)經(jīng)營(yíng)性基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施特點(diǎn),提出VFM中涉及的主要參數(shù)的計(jì)算方法,為政府制定PPP項(xiàng)目物有所值評(píng)價(jià)方法提供了思路。
[Abstract]:With the acceleration of urbanization in China, the public demand for urban infrastructure is gradually increasing. The tax system reform of our country has weakened the financial ability of the local government, and the contradiction between the rapidly increasing demand for public services and the financial ability of the local government has become increasingly prominent. Therefore, the PPP model of introducing social capital into the field of infrastructure investment is favored by government departments, and the application of PPP in the field of infrastructure construction is becoming more and more extensive. However, PPP is only one of the options for providing infrastructure products. It is inevitable that the government will be arbitrary in its subjective preference for a certain procurement model or in its negation of a certain model, and use a scientific and quantifiable basis to determine whether the model can be adopted. Whether the value for money is worth it is more fair and objective. Based on the basic theory of VFM and the specific characteristics of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP projects in China, a VFM quantitative evaluation model for quasi-operational infrastructure PPP projects in China is established in this paper. Firstly, the paper combs the theory and present situation of VFM quantitative evaluation related to PPP projects, and puts forward a framework model for VFM quantitative evaluation of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP projects in view of the operation mode and characteristics of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP projects in China. Then it introduces the three major components of the framework model: the public sector comparison value (shadow PPP value and actual PPP value) and the internal rate of return (IRR). The composition and calculation model of each part are described in detail. Thus, a complete VFM quantitative evaluation model of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP project is constructed. Finally, the newly constructed VFM quantitative evaluation model of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP project is applied to the actual case of the Huan-Ji-Wei supporting waterworks, and the feasibility and applicability of the model are verified by the empirical research based on the specific data and data. It provides a scientific quantitative basis for the choice of PPP mode of quasi-operational infrastructure in China. The main research results of this paper are as follows: (1) Quasi-operational infrastructure VFM quantitative evaluation model can be used as a theoretical model to effectively improve the pre-decision-making system of PPP projects in China. On the basis of VFM qualitative evaluation of PPP project, this evaluation model introduces quantitative decision basis, overcomes subjective deviation in qualitative evaluation, and complements VFM qualitative evaluation. It has effectively improved the pre-stage decision-making system of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP projects in China, and made the quasi-operational infrastructure PPP projects more efficient than the traditional management mode. The VFM quantitative evaluation method based on the internal rate of return (IRR) has been proved to be an important solution to alleviate the problem of landing difficulties of quasi-operational infrastructure projects in China. It is difficult to cover the cost of operating income of some projects in the quasi-operational infrastructure in China, which inevitably reduces the enthusiasm of social capital participation. In this paper, a quantitative evaluation method of VFM combined with PSC and IRR is developed to test whether the PPP project is more efficient than the traditional management of the government, at the same time, it meets the requirements of private enterprises to realize their own interests. The calculation method of the key parameters of VFM quantitative evaluation of quasi-operational infrastructure PPP project provides the train of thought for the government to formulate the evaluation method of PPP project value for money. According to the characteristics of the quasi-operational infrastructure in China, this paper puts forward the calculation method of the main parameters involved in VFM, which provides a train of thought for the government to formulate the evaluation method of the value for money of the PPP project.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F283

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 ;國(guó)家新型城鎮(zhèn)化規(guī)劃(2014—2020年)[J];農(nóng)村工作通訊;2014年06期

2 馬君;;PPP模式在我國(guó)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)中的應(yīng)用前景研究[J];寧夏社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年03期

3 高會(huì)芹;劉運(yùn)國(guó);亓霞;傅鴻源;;基于PPP模式國(guó)際實(shí)踐的VFM評(píng)價(jià)方法研究——以英國(guó)、德國(guó)、新加坡為例[J];項(xiàng)目管理技術(shù);2011年03期

4 賈康;孫潔;;公私伙伴關(guān)系模式的特征與職能[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)縱橫;2009年08期

5 ;國(guó)家發(fā)展改革委、建設(shè)部關(guān)于印發(fā)《水利、水電、電力建設(shè)項(xiàng)目前期工作工程勘察收費(fèi)暫行規(guī)定》的通知[J];中國(guó)勘察設(shè)計(jì);2006年08期

6 王灝;PPP的定義和分類研究[J];都市快軌交通;2004年05期

7 曹遠(yuǎn)征;公共民營(yíng)合作制在中國(guó)[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2003年07期

8 ;財(cái)政部 國(guó)家稅務(wù)總局關(guān)于污水處理費(fèi)有關(guān)增值稅政策的通知[J];中華人民共和國(guó)財(cái)政部文告;2001年11期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 夏宏偉;中國(guó)個(gè)人所得稅制度改革研究[D];財(cái)政部財(cái)政科學(xué)研究所;2013年

2 賴丹馨;基于合約理論的公私合作制（PPP）研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2011年

3 蘭峰;基于WACC結(jié)合Fama-French三因素模型的再生水行業(yè)基準(zhǔn)收益率研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 吳小軍;PPP項(xiàng)目的績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2016年

2 司彤;我國(guó)PPP項(xiàng)目物有所值定量評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國(guó)財(cái)政科學(xué)研究院;2016年

3 閆小波;城市發(fā)展進(jìn)程中基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的配置水平研究[D];山東建筑大學(xué);2016年

4 羅晴;我國(guó)PPP合同體系構(gòu)建研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2014年

5 孫曉麗;基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分擔(dān)的BOT污水處理項(xiàng)目VFM評(píng)價(jià)分析[D];大連理工大學(xué);2013年

6 黃懌煒;PPP項(xiàng)目評(píng)價(jià)方法與決策研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2007年

7 陳崴;中山市十一五基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施發(fā)展規(guī)劃研究[D];同濟(jì)大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1825794