本文選題：區(qū)域快遞效率　切入點(diǎn)：三階段DEA　出處：《長安大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：快遞業(yè)是現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)的重要組成部分,是推動(dòng)流通方式轉(zhuǎn)型、促進(jìn)消費(fèi)升級(jí)的現(xiàn)代化先導(dǎo)性產(chǎn)業(yè)。我國正處于快遞業(yè)改革創(chuàng)新的攻堅(jiān)時(shí)期,也是我國從快遞大國向快遞強(qiáng)國邁進(jìn)的重要時(shí)期。研究區(qū)域快遞效率現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)存在的問題,針對(duì)性提出快遞效率提升建議,可幫助區(qū)域更好的發(fā)展快遞業(yè)。三階段DEA法測(cè)度到的效率值具有不受環(huán)境因素和隨機(jī)干擾影響的優(yōu)點(diǎn),但它屬于靜態(tài)評(píng)價(jià)范疇,無法對(duì)不同年份的效率變化進(jìn)行動(dòng)態(tài)分析,DEA-Malmquist指數(shù)法能夠?qū)Σ煌攴菪首儎?dòng)的情況進(jìn)行分析,彌補(bǔ)靜態(tài)模型分析的缺陷。故本文選擇采用三階段DEA法靜態(tài)橫向?qū)Ρ�、DEA-Malmquist法動(dòng)態(tài)縱向?qū)Ρ妊芯繀^(qū)域快遞效率,對(duì)湖南省進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究。對(duì)比分析湖南與其他省市的快遞效率水平后,對(duì)湖南14個(gè)地市運(yùn)用三階段DEA法進(jìn)行2015年快遞效率橫向?qū)Ρ取⑦\(yùn)用DEA-Malmquist法進(jìn)行2013-2015年快遞效率變動(dòng)情況縱向?qū)Ρ妊芯�。研究結(jié)果表明:(1)第一階段DEA相較于第三階段DEA,低估了湖南省及其地市的快遞技術(shù)效率和規(guī)模效率,高估了純技術(shù)效率;(2)湖南快遞效率水平排名相較經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平排名落后較多,需提升快遞效率,減少資源浪費(fèi);(3)郴州、邵陽、湘潭、岳陽、常德、衡陽快遞效率綜合發(fā)展情況較差。針對(duì)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)的問題,提出湖南快遞效率提升建議,如因地制宜發(fā)展區(qū)域快遞,長沙、株洲以推動(dòng)快遞技術(shù)進(jìn)步和創(chuàng)新為發(fā)展亮點(diǎn),益陽、湘西土家族苗族自治州、永州需擴(kuò)大快遞規(guī)模,郴州、邵陽、湘潭、岳陽、常德、衡陽綜合快遞效率發(fā)展情況較差,是重點(diǎn)關(guān)注城市等等。
[Abstract]:Express delivery industry is an important part of modern service industry. It is a leading modern industry to promote the transformation of circulation mode and promote consumption upgrading. China is in the period of reform and innovation of express delivery industry. It is also an important period for China to move from a big express delivery country to a powerful express delivery country. By studying the current situation of regional express delivery efficiency, we find out the existing problems, and put forward some suggestions for improving express delivery efficiency. The efficiency value measured by the three-stage DEA method has the advantages of not being affected by environmental factors and random interference, but it belongs to the category of static evaluation. The dynamic analysis of efficiency changes in different years can not be carried out. The DEA-Malmquist index method can analyze the variation of efficiency in different years. Therefore, this paper chooses the three-stage DEA static horizontal contrast method to study the efficiency of regional express delivery by dynamic longitudinal comparison of DEA-Malmquist method. After comparing and analyzing the efficiency level of express delivery between Hunan and other provinces and cities, this paper applies three-stage DEA method to carry out the horizontal comparison of express delivery efficiency in 2015 in 14 prefectures of Hunan Province. A longitudinal comparative study on the variation of express delivery efficiency in 2013-2015 is carried out by using DEA-Malmquist method. The results show that the first stage of DEA underestimates the technical efficiency and scale efficiency of express delivery in Hunan Province and its prefectures compared with the third stage. It overestimates the pure technical efficiency. (2) Hunan express delivery efficiency rank lags far behind the economic development level. It is necessary to improve the express delivery efficiency and reduce the waste of resources.) Chenzhou, Shaoyang, Xiangtan, Yueyang, Changde, Hengyang express delivery efficiency comprehensive development is poor. In view of the problems found in the study, Hunan express efficiency promotion suggestions, such as the development of regional express, Changsha, Zhuzhou express delivery technology to promote the development of progress and innovation as the bright spot, Yiyang, Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Yongzhou need to expand the scale of express delivery, Chenzhou, Shaoyang, Xiangtan, Yueyang, Changde, Hengyang comprehensive express efficiency is poor, is a focus on the city and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F259.27

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李松慶;何琴清;;基于三階段DEA模型的廣東省物流業(yè)綜合效率實(shí)證分析[J];物流工程與管理;2016年03期

2 秦立公;王寧寧;李娟;;區(qū)域快遞業(yè)綜合效率的DEA測(cè)評(píng)及優(yōu)化——以廣西為例[J];物流技術(shù);2015年09期

3 馬建峰;何楓;;存在中間產(chǎn)品退出的混合型多階段系統(tǒng)DEA效率評(píng)價(jià)[J];系統(tǒng)工程理論與實(shí)踐;2015年11期

4 徐銳;王浩;;我國快遞產(chǎn)業(yè)運(yùn)營效率研究[J];物流科技;2015年04期

5 徐楊楊;桂云苗;姜梅;林燕;;網(wǎng)購快遞最后一公里配送績效評(píng)價(jià)——以安徽省為例[J];物流工程與管理;2014年10期

6 陳巍巍;張雷;馬鐵虎;劉秋~x;;關(guān)于三階段DEA模型的幾點(diǎn)研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2014年09期

7 王蕾;薛國梁;張紅麗;;基于DEA分析法的新疆北疆現(xiàn)代物流效率分析[J];資源科學(xué);2014年07期

8 樂小兵;王瑛;;基于DEA模型的廣西物流服務(wù)效率評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];科技管理研究;2014年05期

9 孟魁;;基于三階段DEA方法的中部六省物流效率評(píng)價(jià)[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2014年02期

10 呂榮勝;陳曉杰;;我國物流行業(yè)全要素能源效率實(shí)證分析[J];商業(yè)研究;2014年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張明;合肥市快遞網(wǎng)絡(luò)的效率及其影響因素[D];上海師范大學(xué);2016年

2 鄧楚琪;基于PCA-DEA模型的X物流公司網(wǎng)點(diǎn)績效評(píng)價(jià)與管理研究[D];華南理工大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1619251