發(fā)布時間：2018-03-11 07:24

  本文選題：績效評價　切入點(diǎn)：保障性住房　出處：《西安建筑科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：房屋作為人類生存和發(fā)展的基本物質(zhì)保障,它既是人類居住的一個物理空間,更是人們生活方式和生活理念的載體。在我國,從1998年的住房制度改革以來,房地產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)歷了約20年的快速發(fā)展,住宅的產(chǎn)能和總體規(guī)模都達(dá)到了較高水平,房價也在不斷上升。但是,伴隨著中國經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,貧富差距逐漸增大,導(dǎo)致部分低收入人群在住宅市場化競爭中處于劣勢,無力支付因房價過高產(chǎn)生的居住成本,基本住房需求得不到滿足。政府作為公民的服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)有責(zé)任采取相應(yīng)的住房保障措施解決這一問題,其中,保障性住房建設(shè)就是最主要的舉措之一。近年來,我國不斷加大保障性住房建設(shè)力度,尤其在“十二五”期間,每年有600至700萬套的保障性住房建設(shè)計劃。不過,隨著這些保障性住房工程項目陸續(xù)竣工交付,新的問題也不斷暴露出來。保障房工程質(zhì)量不合格、配套設(shè)施不完善、建成后長期閑置和被不符合申請條件的人占用等問題頻現(xiàn),使保障性住房項目建設(shè)沒有完全達(dá)到預(yù)期的效果。保障性住房作為一項政府公共投資項目,其投資效果關(guān)系到每一個公民的切身利益。對保障性住房項目進(jìn)行績效評價,既可以通過評價結(jié)果實(shí)際反映保障性住房建設(shè)過程中存在的問題,也可以指導(dǎo)保障性住房政策調(diào)整和完善保障性住房管理體系,從而提高保障性住房政策的作用。本文借鑒了國內(nèi)外對公共項目績效評價研究理論和方法的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)階段保障性住房項目的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和特點(diǎn),對研究保障性住房績效評價的方法和內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了分析,在文獻(xiàn)研究的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合專家訪談意見,梳理出保障性住房項目的績效評價指標(biāo),并運(yùn)用模糊綜合評價法以西安市保障性住房項目為研究對象進(jìn)行績效評價。評價結(jié)果為“良好”,并根據(jù)評價反饋信息提出了提高保障性住房項目績效水平的措施。
[Abstract]:As the basic material guarantee for human survival and development, housing is not only a physical space for human beings to live in, but also a carrier of people's way of life and concept of life. In our country, since the reform of housing system in 1998, The real estate industry has experienced about 20 years of rapid development, the production capacity and overall scale of housing have reached a relatively high level, housing prices are also rising. However, with the rapid development of China's economy, the gap between the rich and the poor is gradually increasing. As a result, some low-income people are at a disadvantage in the housing market competition, unable to pay the housing costs caused by the excessive housing prices, The government, as a service agency for citizens, has the responsibility to take corresponding housing security measures to solve this problem, among which, the construction of affordable housing is one of the most important measures. In recent years, China continues to increase its efforts to build affordable housing, especially during the 12th Five-Year Plan period, with 600 to 7 million sets of affordable housing construction plans each year. However, as these affordable housing projects are completed and delivered one after another, New problems have also been exposed. Problems such as the quality of indemnificatory apartment's project are not up to standard, the supporting facilities are not perfect, the long-term idle after completion and occupation by people who do not meet the requirements for application are frequently encountered. As a government public investment project, the investment effect of the indemnificatory housing project is related to the vital interests of every citizen. It can not only reflect the problems existing in the construction of affordable housing through the evaluation results, but also guide the adjustment of housing policy and improve the management system of affordable housing. So as to improve the role of affordable housing policy. This paper draws lessons from the theory and method of performance evaluation of public projects at home and abroad, combined with the current situation and characteristics of the development of affordable housing projects in China. This paper analyzes the methods and contents of the research on the performance evaluation of affordable housing. On the basis of literature research, combined with the opinions of experts, the performance evaluation indexes of affordable housing projects are sorted out. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the performance of the indemnificatory housing project in Xi'an city. The result is "good", and the measures to improve the performance level of the indemnificatory housing project are put forward according to the feedback information.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王利國;;高等教育收費(fèi)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論分析[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2015年10期

2 賈樂盈;;保障性住房建設(shè)項目后評價指標(biāo)體系研究[J];價格月刊;2014年10期

3 胡杰;李子俠;韓冬;臧微;;我國保障性住房項目后評價體系構(gòu)建思路——基于過程績效的視角[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2014年18期

4 李輝;孫燕;范麗;;保障性住房公眾滿意度影響因素研究[J];工程管理學(xué)報;2014年03期

5 曾廣錄;曾汪泉;;保障性住房建設(shè)滿意度影響因素的實(shí)證分析——基于五省會城市住房保障對象的調(diào)查[J];財經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2013年06期

6 申志東;;運(yùn)用層次分析法構(gòu)建國有企業(yè)績效評價體系[J];審計研究;2013年02期

7 高義;戚巍;易勇;;我國地方政府住房保障績效評估指標(biāo)體系研究——基于“目標(biāo)—標(biāo)桿”二維視角[J];科研管理;2012年06期

8 王臻榮;任曉春;;我國地方政府績效模型的構(gòu)建與分析[J];中國行政管理;2011年11期

9 翟方正;;基于主成分類聚分析的區(qū)域物流規(guī)劃——以廣東省為例[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2011年02期

10 林積昌;陸云;邵國華;倪宏星;;對保障性住房價格機(jī)制及其監(jiān)管的思考[J];價格理論與實(shí)踐;2010年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 朱丹云;政府投資保障房建設(shè)項目后評價研究[D];福州大學(xué);2014年

2 黃夢霞;公共基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施政府投資效率的評價研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2014年

3 韓芳;武漢市保障性住房運(yùn)行模式研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2013年

4 鄧潔;保障性住房項目績效評價研究[D];集美大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1597147