本文關(guān)鍵詞： 環(huán)境規(guī)制 工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率 命令—控制型 市場激勵(lì)型　出處：《研究與發(fā)展管理》2017年02期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：本文利用1997—2013年中國30個(gè)省區(qū)市的資源消耗、環(huán)境污染和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展數(shù)據(jù),結(jié)合Super-DEA方法對中國省際工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率進(jìn)行測算,并以此為基礎(chǔ)探究中國不同環(huán)境規(guī)制工具的節(jié)能減排效應(yīng)差異.結(jié)果表明:市場激勵(lì)型比命令—控制型規(guī)制工具更具減排靈活性和激勵(lì)長效性,命令—控制型規(guī)制手段對區(qū)域工業(yè)綠色全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響呈U形關(guān)系,基于經(jīng)濟(jì)激勵(lì)方式下"利用市場"的環(huán)境政策工具——排污收費(fèi)制度效應(yīng)為正,而"建立市場"的環(huán)境政策工具——排污權(quán)交易試點(diǎn)政策并未表現(xiàn)出顯著穩(wěn)定的效應(yīng);東部地區(qū)的規(guī)制運(yùn)行整體優(yōu)于中西部地區(qū),西部次之,中部最差;環(huán)境法制的完善對政府"利用市場"起到一定的促進(jìn)作用,但"建立市場"的法制體系尚未健全.最后,提出相應(yīng)的政策建議.
[Abstract]:This paper uses the data of resource consumption, environmental pollution and economic development of 30 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities in China from 1997 to 2013. Combined with Super-DEA method, the green total factor productivity of interprovincial industry in China is measured. The results show that the market incentive model is more flexible and more effective than the command-control regulation tool in terms of energy saving and emission reduction effects of different environmental regulation tools in China. The influence of command-control regulation means on the green total factor productivity of regional industry is U-shaped, and the environmental policy tool of "utilizing the market" based on the economic incentive mode, the pollution charge system, is positive. However, the environmental policy tool of "establishing market", the pilot policy of emission trading, did not show a significant stable effect; The regulation operation of the eastern region is better than that of the central and western regions as a whole, followed by the western region, and the central region is the worst. The perfection of the environmental legal system promotes the government to "utilize the market", but the legal system of "establishing the market" is not perfect. Finally, the corresponding policy suggestions are put forward.
【作者單位】： 浙江理工大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;浙江省生態(tài)文明研究中心;陜西師范大學(xué)國際商學(xué)院;興業(yè)銀行博士后科研工作站;
【基金】：浙江省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)研究基地規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“生態(tài)科技創(chuàng)新的環(huán)境規(guī)制路徑優(yōu)化研究”(16DGH088) 浙江理工大學(xué)科研啟動基金資助項(xiàng)目“以產(chǎn)業(yè)綠色轉(zhuǎn)型為導(dǎo)向的環(huán)境規(guī)制研究”(16092198-Y)
【分類號】：X32;F224;F424
【正文快照】： 工業(yè)作為中國實(shí)體經(jīng)濟(jì)的產(chǎn)業(yè)主體,是物質(zhì)財(cái)富的重要來源,工業(yè)化道路使得我國經(jīng)濟(jì)快速增長、財(cái)富迅速積累,成為實(shí)現(xiàn)國富民強(qiáng)的重要路徑.然而,以大規(guī)模消耗資源和犧牲環(huán)境為代價(jià)、“先污染、后治理”的粗放型發(fā)展模式,不僅造成了日益嚴(yán)峻的環(huán)境污染和生態(tài)失衡問題,也嚴(yán)重地制約，

本文編號：1470308