本文關鍵詞： 納米技術 風險溝通 公眾參與 風險認知 參與意向　出處：《大連理工大學》2016年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：納米技術研發(fā)及產業(yè)化發(fā)展迅速,各國紛紛將其作為戰(zhàn)略性新興產業(yè)予以支持。但納米技術科學前沿知識的不確定性及其在技術應用和產業(yè)化過程中可能引發(fā)的環(huán)境和健康風險,制約了納米技術健康、負責任地發(fā)展。公眾參與納米技術等高技術風險治理已成為國際上技術風險治理的新方向和迫切需求。納米基礎知識交叉性、技術應用中風險疊加性、公共風險衍生性和風險認知資源的不均衡性,增加了納米技術風險治理的難度。因此,公眾參與納米技術風險溝通意向影響因素及其作用關系研究,具有重要意義。本文以風險認知、科學素養(yǎng)、風險社會放大、計劃行為理論為基礎,圍繞風險參與本體和溝通活動對象,以扎根理論方法,構建了公眾參與風險溝通意向影響因素的理論分析框架,識別了公眾參與納米風險溝通意向的內、外部影響因素,建立了影響因素關系概念模型,在此基礎上提出相關路徑假設并加以驗證。通過回歸分析和結構方程分析,修正計劃行為理論模型,揭示模型中因子間的作用關系,為納米技術風險治理中分析、預測、評價和引導公眾參與納米風險溝通提供依據(jù)。在公眾參與納米技術風險溝通內部影響因素的研究中,通過設計量表和探索性分析,識別了信息源和信任構成要素,依據(jù)風險信息、信任動機、善意信任和能力信任等因子,構建了公眾對社會利益相關方的風險認知與參與風險溝通意向的關聯(lián)模型。利用結構路徑數(shù)據(jù)工具SMART-PLS2.0進行實證分析,建立路徑結構方程,揭示了公眾納米風險本體認知發(fā)展過程與參與風險溝通意向形成的路徑。路徑結構方程分析表明,公眾對納米的風險判斷是公眾獲得風險信息到產生風險擔憂的中介變量；公眾風險認知過程中形成的風險擔憂與參與溝通意向呈負相關關系；善意信任是公眾獲得風險信息到形成參與風險溝通意向的中介變量；公眾的參與態(tài)度在公眾納米風險擔憂和參與風險溝通意向形成中發(fā)揮中介作用。在公眾參與納米技術風險溝通的外部影響因素分析中,將計劃行為理論中主觀規(guī)范變量細化為人際社會網絡和技術社會治理網絡兩個變量,將行為控制變量修正為制度效能、自我效能和情境效能三個變量,進而建立了修正概念模型。分層回歸分析表明,修正模型可以提高概念模型影響因素調節(jié)作用的解釋力。此外,以方差分析識別了人口文化特征中學科專業(yè)是影響公眾行為心理的重要因素。以公眾受社會人際網絡和制度程序影響高低不同的文化特征為依據(jù),結合公眾的學歷、職業(yè)、學科的測量結果,劃分了公眾參與行為意向偏好的不同類型,為管理者在預測和評價公眾代表的參與風險溝通行為提供參考依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Research and industrialization of nanotechnology are developing rapidly. Many countries support it as a strategic emerging industry, but the uncertainty of the frontier knowledge of nanotechnology science and the environmental and health risks that may be caused in the process of technology application and industrialization. It has restricted the healthy and responsible development of nanotechnology. Public participation in high-tech risk governance such as nanotechnology has become a new direction and urgent need of international technology risk governance. The risk superposition, the public risk derivation and the disequilibrium of risk cognition resources in the application of technology increase the difficulty of nanotechnology risk management. It is of great significance for the public to participate in the research on the influencing factors of risk communication intention and the relationship between them. This paper is based on risk cognition, scientific literacy, risk social amplification and planning behavior theory. Around risk participation ontology and communication activity object, this paper constructs the theoretical analysis framework of influencing factors of public participation risk communication intention, and identifies the inner part of public participation in nano risk communication intention by taking root in theory and method. On the basis of establishing the conceptual model of influencing factor relation, the related path hypothesis is put forward and verified. Through regression analysis and structural equation analysis, the theoretical model of planning behavior is revised. To reveal the relationship between factors in the model, for nanotechnology risk management analysis, prediction. To evaluate and guide the public to participate in nanotechnology risk communication to provide the basis. In the study of the internal impact factors of public participation in nanotechnology risk communication, through the design of scale and exploratory analysis. It identifies the information source and the elements of trust, according to the risk information, trust motivation, goodwill trust and ability trust and other factors. This paper constructs an association model between the public's risk cognition and risk communication intention of social stakeholders, and makes an empirical analysis by using structured path data tool (SMART-PLS2.0). The path structure equation is established to reveal the path of the process of the development of public nano-risk ontology cognition and the formation of the intention to participate in risk communication. The path structure equation analysis shows that. The public's risk judgment of nanometer is the intermediate variable from which the public obtains risk information and causes risk worry. The risk concern formed in the process of public risk cognition is negatively related to the intention to participate in communication; Goodwill trust is an intermediary variable from which the public obtains risk information and forms the intention to participate in risk communication. Public participation attitude plays an intermediary role in public nano risk concern and risk communication intention formation. In the analysis of external factors of public participation in nanotechnology risk communication. The subjective normative variables in the planning behavior theory are divided into two variables: interpersonal social network and technological social governance network, and the behavioral control variables are modified into three variables: institutional effectiveness, self-efficacy and situational effectiveness. The hierarchical regression analysis shows that the modified model can improve the explanatory power of the influence factors of the conceptual model. Based on the analysis of variance, this paper identifies that discipline and specialty are the important factors that influence the behavior and psychology of the public in the cultural characteristics of the population, and are based on the different cultural characteristics of the public influenced by social interpersonal networks and institutional procedures. Combined with the measurement results of public education, occupation and discipline, different types of intention preference of public participation behavior are divided, which provides a reference for managers in predicting and evaluating public representatives' risk communication behavior.
【學位授予單位】：大連理工大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：TB383.1;F224
，

本文編號：1443136