本文關(guān)鍵詞：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)效應(yīng)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的機(jī)制研究—跨越“中等收入陷阱”的新啟示　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 中等收入陷阱 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù) 自主創(chuàng)新 經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體系里,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)已經(jīng)成為一國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的重要?jiǎng)恿�。拉美等地區(qū)的新興市場(chǎng)國(guó)家在經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展初期,通過弱知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的手段獲得技術(shù)溢出為其經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)帶來顯著動(dòng)力。然而,隨著技術(shù)水平的逐漸發(fā)展,基于勞動(dòng)力優(yōu)勢(shì)與模仿創(chuàng)新所能實(shí)現(xiàn)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)逐漸遞減。而且長(zhǎng)期以來的弱知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)導(dǎo)致其自主創(chuàng)新能力相對(duì)缺乏,因此新興市場(chǎng)國(guó)家便不可避免陷入"中等收入陷阱"。而東亞地區(qū)等國(guó)家則無一例外地通過知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度保護(hù)自主創(chuàng)新、從而邁過"中等收入陷阱",實(shí)現(xiàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)的持續(xù)增長(zhǎng)。顯然,從拉美與東亞的經(jīng)驗(yàn)可知,"中等收入陷阱"問題實(shí)質(zhì)上是經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的階段性動(dòng)力缺失問題。因此,本文嘗試從Woo等(2015)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)效應(yīng)入手,研究知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)效應(yīng)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響,并為經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)找到新動(dòng)力,從而為跨越中等收入陷阱提供一定的啟示。本文試圖回答以下三個(gè)方面的問題:1、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)中等收入國(guó)家的自主創(chuàng)新與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)帶來何種影響?2、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)高收入國(guó)家的自主創(chuàng)新與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)又帶來哪方面的影響?3、是否中等收入國(guó)家(或高收入國(guó)家)提高自主創(chuàng)新水平后,便能獲得持續(xù)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)?第二章里,我們首先對(duì)關(guān)于研究"中等收入陷阱"的理論文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行評(píng)述,并總結(jié)出關(guān)于跨越"中等收入陷阱"的不同研究視角。接著,我們對(duì)研究自主創(chuàng)新、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)以及經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)三者關(guān)系的理論文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行梳理與綜述。第三章里,本文將自主創(chuàng)新與知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度結(jié)合起來,并分析其對(duì)不同發(fā)展階段下的經(jīng)濟(jì)體經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的影響。為此,在第三章里我們以拉美與東亞地區(qū)的部分經(jīng)濟(jì)體作為陷入"中等收入陷阱"以及邁過"中等收入陷阱"的代表,并采用GP指數(shù)、ECI指數(shù)與人均國(guó)際元來分別衡量知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平、創(chuàng)新水平與人均收入,通過構(gòu)造數(shù)據(jù)圖的方式總結(jié)兩地區(qū)創(chuàng)新水平、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的發(fā)展過程,并得出:發(fā)展較早的拉美地區(qū),過去一個(gè)世紀(jì)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)雖然保持向上增長(zhǎng),但是由于緩慢的增速導(dǎo)致其難以達(dá)到高收入階段。而東亞地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟(jì)體則通過40年左右的趕超增長(zhǎng)超越拉美地區(qū),并達(dá)到高收入國(guó)家階段;另外,兩地區(qū)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平總體都呈上升趨勢(shì),但是東亞地區(qū)的上升速度更加勻速;最后,拉美地區(qū)的創(chuàng)新水平始終處于停滯狀態(tài),而東亞地區(qū)的創(chuàng)新水平則呈"U"型發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。但是,通過圖示趨勢(shì)分析我們無法得知兩地區(qū)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)對(duì)自主創(chuàng)新與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的相關(guān)性影響。在基于Woo等(2015)關(guān)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)效應(yīng)的理論研究下,第四章我們以 Branstetter 等(2007)和 Gustafsson 和 Segerstrom(2010)的模型為基礎(chǔ),重新構(gòu)建一個(gè)南北貿(mào)易均衡模型,來研究?jī)傻貐^(qū)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的制度效應(yīng)與創(chuàng)新效應(yīng)。通過模型分析我們發(fā)現(xiàn):1、高收入地區(qū)的制度效應(yīng)較弱,創(chuàng)新效應(yīng)較強(qiáng);2、中等收入地區(qū)的制度效應(yīng)較強(qiáng),創(chuàng)新效應(yīng)較弱;3、中等收入地區(qū)里知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與創(chuàng)新水平呈非線性關(guān)系,而高收入地區(qū)里兩者的關(guān)系則為正但邊際遞減。為對(duì)第四章的命題進(jìn)行檢驗(yàn),在第五章里我們收集部分國(guó)家的面板數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析并發(fā)現(xiàn):首先,中等收入國(guó)家擁有較為顯著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度效應(yīng),但是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)創(chuàng)新效應(yīng)較弱;其次,中等收入地區(qū)的創(chuàng)新水平與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)之間具有較弱但顯著的正相關(guān)關(guān)系;而高收入國(guó)家的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度效應(yīng)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)并無產(chǎn)生顯著影響;最后,中等收入地區(qū)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平與創(chuàng)新水平之間存在顯著的非線性關(guān)系。而高收入地區(qū)里兩者為顯著的正相關(guān)線性關(guān)系。同樣在第五章里,我們首先將知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)系數(shù)重新分為立法強(qiáng)度、司法強(qiáng)度與執(zhí)法強(qiáng)度。然后,我們將三個(gè)強(qiáng)度指標(biāo)采用加權(quán)平均的方法測(cè)算成知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)總指標(biāo),并用其來衡量中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)強(qiáng)度�；诒疚牡难芯拷Y(jié)論,第六章提出系統(tǒng)性的政策建議:一、保障我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平的適度發(fā)展,致力構(gòu)建松弛有度的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度;二、合理促進(jìn)我國(guó)自主創(chuàng)新水平的提高,對(duì)待經(jīng)濟(jì)結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)切忌操之過急,以至于錯(cuò)失最佳的轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)機(jī);三、正確對(duì)待促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的其他相關(guān)因素,確保各相關(guān)因素的增長(zhǎng)保持在合理水平;四、加大力度構(gòu)建健全的區(qū)域或產(chǎn)業(yè)微觀數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),力爭(zhēng)為精確測(cè)算我國(guó)區(qū)域或產(chǎn)業(yè)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平打下良好基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:In the modern market economy, the protection of intellectual property has become an important driving force for a country's economic growth. Latin American emerging market countries in the early stage of economic development, the weak protection of intellectual property rights means to obtain technology spillovers bring significant impetus for economic growth. However, with the gradual development of the technical level, labor advantage and imitation innovation can be realized based on economic growth and long-term decline gradually. Since the weak protection of intellectual property rights lead to the relative lack of the capability of independent innovation, so that emerging market countries will inevitably fall into the "middle income trap". And the East Asian countries are without exception by the intellectual property rights protection system of independent innovation, which crossed the "middle-income trap" and achieve the steady growth of the economy. Obviously, the experience from Latin America and East Asia, "middle income trap" is the essence of economic growth The stage of lack of power. Therefore, this article attempts from the Woo (2015) of the effect of intellectual property rights, intellectual property research of effect on economic growth, and to find a new impetus to economic growth, thus providing enlightenment to cross the middle-income trap. This paper attempts to answer the following three questions: 1. The protection of intellectual property rights of middle-income countries, independent innovation and economic growth and what impact? 2, the protection of intellectual property rights of independent innovation and economic growth in the high-income countries and the impact of what? 3, whether the middle-income countries (or high-income countries) to improve the level of independent innovation, will be able to obtain the sustained economic growth? The second chapter, we first review the literature on the research of the "middle income trap", and summarizes the different perspectives on across the "middle-income trap". Then, we study on the self The main innovation, the theoretical literature of intellectual property protection and economic growth, the relationship between the three review and review. The third chapter, the independent innovation and intellectual property protection system combined, and analyzes its influence on the different stages of development of the economy. Therefore, representatives in the third chapter we are taking part in economy Latin America and East Asia as a "middle-income trap" and crossed the "middle income trap", and the GP index, ECI index and per capita yuan respectively to measure the level of international protection of intellectual property rights, innovation level and average income, sum up the innovation level of two area by constructing data map, development process, intellectual property the protection and economic growth and that the early development of the Latin American region, over a century of economic growth while maintaining the upward growth, but due to the slow growth caused by the hard to reach High income stage. While the economies of East Asia through catch-up growth beyond the region about 40 years, and reached the stage of high income countries; in addition, the two areas of intellectual property protection level of the overall trend is rising, but the rising speed of East Asia is more uniform; the level of innovation, the Latin American region has always been in stagnation state, and the level of innovation in East Asia was "U" type development trend. However, by the trend analysis, we do not know the two areas of intellectual property protection effect on the relationship between independent innovation and economic growth. Based on Woo (2015) theoretical research on intellectual property effect, the fourth chapter we use Branstetter etc. (2007) and Gustafsson and Segerstrom (2010) model as the foundation, to build a North South trade equilibrium model, system effect and innovation effect to the protection of intellectual property rights of two regions Through the analysis of the model. We found that: 1, weak institutional effects of higher income areas, strong innovation effect; 2, the effect of the system of middle-income areas is strong, innovation effect is weak; 3, middle-income regions in the protection of intellectual property rights and innovation level of non-linear relationship, and the relationship between the high-income regions is positive but the fourth chapter is on the marginal decline. The proposition was tested in the fifth chapter, we collected the panel data of some countries and the empirical analysis found that: firstly, middle-income countries have a more significant effect of the intellectual property system, but the effect of innovation of intellectual property rights is weak; secondly, between the level of innovation and economic growth in middle-income areas is weak but a significant positive correlation; and the intellectual property system effect in high income countries have a significant impact on economic growth is not; finally, water protection of intellectual property rights of middle-income areas There is a non-linear relationship between level and innovation level. While high income areas in both positive correlation significantly linear relationship. Similarly, in the fifth chapter, we will first intellectual property protection coefficient into legislative judicial law enforcement strength, strength and strength. Then, we will have three strength index using weighted average method to calculate the protection of intellectual property rights into the total index, which is used to measure the strength of intellectual property protection China. Based on the conclusions of this paper, put forward the policies and suggestions of sixth chapters: in Chapter one, the development of China's security appropriate level of protection of intellectual property rights, is committed to building a loose system of intellectual property protection degree; two, promoting the rational of our own to raise the level of innovation, towards the transformation of economic structure to avoid missing the best time to act with undue haste, transformation; three, correctly treat other related factors to promote economic growth, to ensure The growth of all relevant factors is kept at a reasonable level. Four, we should intensify efforts to build a sound regional or industrial micro database, and strive to lay a good foundation for accurately measuring the level of intellectual property protection in China's regional or industrial sectors.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F204;F124.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊速炎;;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)面臨“中等收入陷阱”挑戰(zhàn)[J];觀察與思考;2009年05期

2 滕泰;;中國(guó)能跨過“中等收入陷阱”嗎?[J];全國(guó)新書目;2009年05期

3 馬文余;;落實(shí)科學(xué)發(fā)展觀 跨越“中等收入陷阱”[J];新遠(yuǎn)見;2009年07期

4 安宇宏;;中等收入陷阱[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2010年01期

5 鄧;喬榛;;“中等收入陷阱”的中國(guó)式特征及規(guī)避[J];當(dāng)代社科視野;2010年05期

6 李楠;孫成;;中國(guó)規(guī)避“中等收入陷阱”的對(duì)策探析[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2010年13期

7 胡鞍鋼;;中國(guó)會(huì)掉進(jìn)“中等收入陷阱”嗎[J];商周刊;2010年15期

8 胡鞍鋼;;中國(guó)如何跨越“中等收入陷阱”[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年15期

9 胡鞍鋼;;“中等收入陷阱”逼近中國(guó)?[J];人民論壇;2010年19期

10 高偉;;中等收入陷阱假說[J];人民論壇;2010年19期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 田井泉;;“中等收入陷阱”:現(xiàn)實(shí)與跨越[A];第六屆中國(guó)中部地區(qū)商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇論文集[C];2012年

2 古耀杰;;我國(guó)規(guī)避“中等收入陷阱”風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的路徑選擇[A];2012-2015年轉(zhuǎn)型期的中國(guó)——中國(guó)未來研究會(huì)2012年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

3 張瑾;;我國(guó)跨越“中等收入陷阱”具備四大有利條件[A];中國(guó)智庫(kù)經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察（2013年第1輯）[C];2013年

4 ;第四十四期 如何避免和跨越“中等收入陷阱”[A];中國(guó)智庫(kù)經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察（2013年第1輯）[C];2013年

5 宗良;;我國(guó)跨越“中等收入陷阱”面臨的挑戰(zhàn)與抉擇[A];中國(guó)智庫(kù)經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察（2013年第1輯）[C];2013年

6 徐長(zhǎng)春;;推進(jìn)國(guó)際科技中心建設(shè) 破解“中等收入陷阱”[A];加快轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式研究（2010-2011）[C];2011年

7 周文;孫懿;;中國(guó)面對(duì)“中等收入陷阱”問題的解構(gòu):本質(zhì)、挑戰(zhàn)與對(duì)策[A];中華外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說研究會(huì)第19次年會(huì)暨外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說與國(guó)內(nèi)外經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展新格局（會(huì)議文集）[C];2011年

8 莊巨忠;;超越低成本優(yōu)勢(shì):中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)如何避免落入中等收入陷阱[A];2012年秋季CMRC中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察（總第31期）[C];2012年

9 盧現(xiàn)祥;羅小芳;;中國(guó)能跨越“中等收入陷阱”嗎——基于利益集團(tuán)理論視角的分析[A];社會(huì)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)理論研究集萃（2012）：——穩(wěn)中求進(jìn)的中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)[C];2012年

10 左連村;林正靜;;廣東跨越“中等收入陷阱”的思考[A];市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與增長(zhǎng)質(zhì)量——2013年嶺南經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇暨廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)年會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 駐京記者 孫佳華;謹(jǐn)防“中等收入陷阱”[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 清華大學(xué)中國(guó)國(guó)情研究中心主任 胡鞍鋼;中國(guó)能夠跨越“中等收入陷阱”[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

3 國(guó)家發(fā)改委經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所博士、長(zhǎng)策智庫(kù)全球宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)政策特約研究員 曾錚;馬來西亞意欲擺脫“中等收入陷阱”[N];第一財(cái)經(jīng)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

4 本報(bào)記者 胡雅君　實(shí)習(xí)記者 張曉陽(yáng);跨越“中等收入陷阱”[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2010年

5 李友忠 中國(guó)改革發(fā)展研究院博士 采訪 李金金;中國(guó)是否會(huì)陷入“中等收入陷阱”?[N];北京科技報(bào);2011年

6 記者 韓潔　徐蕊;避“中等收入陷阱”,須主動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)型[N];新華每日電訊;2011年

7 韓潔;如何避免落入“中等收入陷阱”[N];中國(guó)信息報(bào);2011年

8 北京大學(xué)副校長(zhǎng) 劉偉　本報(bào)記者 羅彥 整理;穿越中等收入陷阱[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

9 中央黨校教授 陳江生;中國(guó)發(fā)展不會(huì)落入“中等收入陷阱”[N];中國(guó)高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)導(dǎo)報(bào);2011年

10 本報(bào)記者 肖國(guó)忠;多方著力跨越“中等收入陷阱”[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 畢磊;新常態(tài)下中國(guó)跨越中等收入陷阱問題研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年

2 關(guān)麗潔;“中等收入陷阱”與中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

3 柳勇;有效資本積累與跨越“中等收入陷阱”[D];南開大學(xué);2012年

4 孫琦峰;中國(guó)進(jìn)入高收入國(guó)家行列的路徑研究[D];北京交通大學(xué);2015年

5 李玲玲;收入差距、有效需求不足與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)放緩[D];暨南大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 鄭杰;我國(guó)面臨中等收入陷阱威脅及規(guī)避政策研究[D];青島大學(xué);2012年

2 姜玉凱;“中等收入陷阱”跨越與中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的路徑選擇[D];西南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

3 孫盼;關(guān)于“中等收入陷阱”問題研究[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2013年

4 林碩;基于國(guó)際經(jīng)驗(yàn)的中國(guó)跨越“中等收入陷阱”問題研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2013年

5 高琴琴;論中國(guó)規(guī)避中等收入陷阱問題[D];浙江師范大學(xué);2013年

6 李帥;中國(guó)面臨“中等收入陷阱”的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和對(duì)策研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2013年

7 馬瑜;中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)雁陣式跨越“中等收入陷阱”的問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年

8 費(fèi)曉娟;中等收入陷阱的問題研究[D];吉林財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

9 程雪嬌;中國(guó)跨越“中等收入陷阱”研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2015年

10 劉鵬;中國(guó)如何跨越“中等收入陷阱”[D];蘭州大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1362018