【摘要】：本研究把第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃與對(duì)手防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用的對(duì)比分析作為研究對(duì)象,本文主要采用文獻(xiàn)調(diào)查法與錄像觀察法等研究方法,結(jié)合比賽錄像分析對(duì)比中國(guó)男籃與其對(duì)手在比賽中運(yùn)用的戰(zhàn)術(shù)類型、戰(zhàn)術(shù)過(guò)程和戰(zhàn)術(shù)結(jié)果,得出結(jié)論如下:1.從第31屆里約奧運(yùn)會(huì)的男籃比賽中可以看出,當(dāng)前世界高水平籃球隊(duì)伍可以憑借場(chǎng)上的各種變化,采用相對(duì)合理準(zhǔn)確的的防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)作出及時(shí)的調(diào)整,使防守對(duì)象的層次感更加突出,防守重點(diǎn)更加明顯,很好地詮釋了現(xiàn)代籃球防守運(yùn)動(dòng)的趨勢(shì)。2.在第31屆里約奧運(yùn)會(huì)中,除委內(nèi)瑞拉男籃外,中國(guó)男籃同與賽隊(duì)的防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)主要采用以半場(chǎng)人盯人防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)為主,其次是快攻防守戰(zhàn)術(shù),區(qū)域聯(lián)防戰(zhàn)術(shù)的運(yùn)用大多出現(xiàn)在球隊(duì)?wèi)?zhàn)術(shù)變化時(shí),混合防守和綜合防守的使用次數(shù)較少。相比與賽隊(duì)靈活多變的防守戰(zhàn)術(shù),中國(guó)隊(duì)在防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)選擇方面過(guò)于單調(diào),變化次數(shù)少,且比較被動(dòng),未能及時(shí)根據(jù)對(duì)手的進(jìn)攻方式作出相應(yīng)的調(diào)整。3.中國(guó)隊(duì)運(yùn)用最多的防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)是半場(chǎng)人盯人防守,尤其是半場(chǎng)縮小人盯人防守的運(yùn)用。中國(guó)隊(duì)很好地利用了自身內(nèi)線的身高優(yōu)勢(shì),但在戰(zhàn)術(shù)執(zhí)行力方面較差,隊(duì)員之間換防、協(xié)防及補(bǔ)防的能力不足,防守時(shí)隊(duì)員意識(shí)差,移動(dòng)速度慢且重心高,對(duì)持球隊(duì)員的防守未能進(jìn)行有效地緊逼、包夾控制。從每場(chǎng)的平均失分可以看出,對(duì)手防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)整體成功率要高于中國(guó)隊(duì)。4.在防快攻方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)與其對(duì)手相比,回防速度慢,意識(shí)不強(qiáng),隊(duì)員分工不明確,防守配合不默契,在比賽中,表現(xiàn)出來(lái)防守效果較差。5.從中國(guó)隊(duì)的五場(chǎng)比賽中,全場(chǎng)緊逼和全場(chǎng)人盯人防守的運(yùn)用次數(shù)可以看出,中國(guó)隊(duì)明顯少于其他對(duì)手,在體能儲(chǔ)備、身體對(duì)抗以及戰(zhàn)術(shù)的運(yùn)用過(guò)程方面要弱于其他隊(duì)。
[Abstract]:In this study, the comparative analysis of the use of defensive tactics between Chinese men's basketball team and opponents in the 31st Olympic Games is taken as the research object. This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature investigation and video observation. Combined with the video analysis of the game, the tactical types, tactical process and tactical results used by the Chinese men's basketball team and their opponents in the game are analyzed and compared, and the conclusions are as follows: 1. From the men's basketball match of the 31st Rio Olympic Games, we can see that the current world high-level basketball team can make timely adjustments by using relatively reasonable and accurate defensive tactics by virtue of all kinds of changes on the court. So that the hierarchical sense of the defensive object is more prominent, the focus of defense is more obvious, which is a good explanation of the trend of modern basketball defense. 2. In the 31st Rio Olympic Games, in addition to the Venezuelan men's basketball team, the defense tactics of the Chinese men's basketball team were mainly half-game man-to-man defense, followed by the fast attack defense tactics. The use of regional joint defense tactics mostly occurs when the team tactics change, the use of mixed defense and comprehensive defense is less. Compared with the flexible and changeable defensive tactics of the match team, the Chinese team is too monotonous in the choice of defensive tactics, less times of change, and more passive, unable to make corresponding adjustments according to the opponent's offensive mode in time. The most widely used defensive tactics in China are half-time man-to-man defense, especially half-time reduction of man-to-man defense. The Chinese team has made good use of its own height advantage, but its tactical execution ability is poor, the ability of changing defense, cooperation and defense between players is insufficient, the consciousness of the players is poor, the speed of movement is slow and the center of gravity is high. The defense of the player who holds the ball can not be effectively pressed and clamped. From the average loss of points per game, it can be seen that the overall success rate of defensive tactics is higher than that of the Chinese team. 4. In the aspect of fast attack, compared with its opponents, the Chinese team has a slow speed, a weak consciousness, a unclear division of labor, a lack of tacit understanding in defense cooperation, and a poor defensive effect in the game. 5. From the five games of the Chinese team, we can see that the Chinese team is significantly less than the other opponents in terms of physical reserve, physical confrontation and the use of tactics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃群;淺談我國(guó)男籃防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)的種類與變化[J];西安體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1989年01期

2 林煜;小個(gè)子運(yùn)動(dòng)員在籃壇仍有一席之地[J];福建體育科技;1996年02期

3 ;集體的局部配合防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)(一)[J];足球俱樂(lè)部;2007年05期

4 ;集體的局部配合防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)(二)[J];足球俱樂(lè)部;2007年07期

5 謝欣;任意球防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)與練習(xí)方法[J];南京體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年06期

6 張俊青,陳曉光;中國(guó)青年男籃參加第7屆世界青年男籃錦標(biāo)賽防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用情況的研究[J];體育科學(xué)研究;2004年03期

7 張智;周毅;王君;;世界高水平足球隊(duì)個(gè)人防守行為與局部防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征研究[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

8 楊次榆;;足球逼迫式攻擊性整體防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用研究[J];西安體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

9 金衛(wèi)星;;論排球“前高位、后低位”的立體化防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)[J];中國(guó)市場(chǎng);2008年22期

10 孫媛;;現(xiàn)代排球防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)原理及應(yīng)用[J];體育科技;2012年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 王昶岱;馮紅靜;;高水平足球比賽后場(chǎng)有球區(qū)域小組防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)行為特征的研究[A];第二十屆全國(guó)高校田徑科研論文報(bào)告會(huì)論文專輯[C];2010年

2 郭榮;;世界女排強(qiáng)隊(duì)后排防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)變化特點(diǎn)與打法分析[A];第八屆全國(guó)體育科學(xué)大會(huì)論文摘要匯編（一）[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李敬凱;第20屆世界杯淘汰賽階段逼迫式防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用情況的研究[D];西安體育學(xué)院;2016年

2 孫振輝;第31屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃與對(duì)手防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用的對(duì)比分析[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

3 李曉倫;第十一屆全運(yùn)會(huì)山東女籃防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)的分析研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2010年

4 鄭立勛;第二十七屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男子籃球比賽八強(qiáng)及中國(guó)隊(duì)防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)的比較研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2003年

5 何百山;第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃和與賽隊(duì)防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合運(yùn)用的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2010年

6 劉志波;第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)女子籃球比賽八強(qiáng)及中國(guó)隊(duì)防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)的比較研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2006年

7 王偉;時(shí)空協(xié)同理論在排球接扣球防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)中的運(yùn)用研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2011年

8 劉亞波;對(duì)第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中外男籃防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用的對(duì)比研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

9 侯巖鈺;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃與對(duì)手防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用的對(duì)比研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2015年

10 黃學(xué)良;29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)、16屆世錦賽中外男籃防守戰(zhàn)術(shù)基礎(chǔ)配合運(yùn)用對(duì)比研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2488766