【摘要】：研究目的:對(duì)上海市部分高校攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)員上、下肢Wingate無(wú)氧功率以及身體成分進(jìn)行測(cè)定,闡述高校攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)員的無(wú)氧代謝能力和身體形態(tài)特征;探討高校攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)員上、下肢無(wú)氧功率、身體成分之間的相關(guān)性,為攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)提高訓(xùn)練效果、運(yùn)動(dòng)員初選材、教練員制定訓(xùn)練計(jì)劃和訓(xùn)練方法提供理論依據(jù)。研究方法:將42名青年男性分為運(yùn)動(dòng)員組和非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組。其中運(yùn)動(dòng)員組為21名高校攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)員;非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組為健康的21名普通在校大學(xué)生。本實(shí)驗(yàn)分為實(shí)驗(yàn)室測(cè)定和運(yùn)動(dòng)場(chǎng)測(cè)定兩個(gè)部分,其中實(shí)驗(yàn)室測(cè)定包括身體形態(tài)指標(biāo)測(cè)定和上、下肢Wingate無(wú)氧功率測(cè)定;運(yùn)動(dòng)場(chǎng)測(cè)定為Powerslap測(cè)定。所有受試者24小時(shí)內(nèi)無(wú)劇烈運(yùn)動(dòng)、睡眠充足,半年內(nèi)無(wú)明顯傷病,體內(nèi)無(wú)金屬移植物;兩組受試者身高、體重相匹配(p0.05)。結(jié)果:(1)運(yùn)動(dòng)員組的體脂率顯著低于非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組(p0.01);兩組BMI、去脂體重?zé)o顯著性差異(p0.05)。(2)運(yùn)動(dòng)員組的Powerslap測(cè)試高度、Powerslap系數(shù)均顯著高于非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組(p0.01)。(3)運(yùn)動(dòng)員組的上肢PP顯著高于非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組(p0.05),PP(W/kg)、AP、AP(W/kg)及MP均非常顯著高于非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組(p0.01),運(yùn)動(dòng)員組的t PP和PD顯著低于非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組(p0.01,p0.05)。(4)兩組的下肢Wingate無(wú)氧功率指標(biāo)不存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異(p0.05)。結(jié)論:(1)運(yùn)動(dòng)員組上肢無(wú)氧功率指標(biāo)顯著優(yōu)于非運(yùn)動(dòng)員組,且具有較強(qiáng)的無(wú)氧能力和爆發(fā)力。(2)兩組受試者上肢肌肉抗疲勞能力優(yōu)于下肢肌肉。(3)兩組下肢Wingate無(wú)氧功率指標(biāo)不存在顯著性差異。建議:(1)身高、臂展可能對(duì)Powerslap測(cè)試成績(jī)具有一定的影響,應(yīng)進(jìn)行綜合對(duì)比、分析。(2)可嘗試將Wingate無(wú)氧實(shí)驗(yàn)運(yùn)用于攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)的訓(xùn)練,也可作為評(píng)價(jià)和監(jiān)測(cè)訓(xùn)練效果的新方式。(3)將Wingate無(wú)氧實(shí)驗(yàn)運(yùn)用于實(shí)際訓(xùn)練時(shí),其內(nèi)容和目的應(yīng)該圍繞提高AP和降低PD來(lái)開(kāi)展。
[Abstract]:Objective: to measure the anaerobic power and body composition of Wingate in the upper and lower limbs of some college climbers in Shanghai, to expound the anaerobic metabolic ability and body shape characteristics of college rock climbing athletes, and to explore the characteristics of the body shape of college rock climbing athletes. The correlation between the anaerobic power of lower limbs and body composition provides the theoretical basis for improving the training effect of rock climbing, selecting the initial material for athletes, and making training plan and training methods for coaches. Methods: 42 young men were divided into athlete group and non-athlete group. The athletes group is 21 college rock climbers and the non-athletes group is 21 normal college students. This experiment is divided into two parts: laboratory measurement and sports field measurement. The laboratory measurement includes body shape index, upper and lower limb Wingate anaerobic power measurement, sports field measurement is Powerslap measurement. All the subjects had no strenuous exercise within 24 hours, enough sleep, no obvious injury within half a year and no metal grafts. The height and weight of the two groups were matched (p0.05). Results: (1) the body fat rate of the athletes was significantly lower than that of the non-athletes (p0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p0.05). (2). The Powerslap test height of the athletes was significantly higher than that of the non-athletes (p0.01). (3), and the PP of the upper limbs of the athletes was significantly higher than that of the non-athletes (p0.01). (3). Compared with the non-athletes group (p0.05), the PP (W/kg) AP (W/kg) and MP in the non-athletes group were significantly higher than those in the non-athlete group (p0.01). The Wingate anaerobic power of the lower extremities in the athletes group was significantly lower than that in the non-athlete group (p0.01p0.05). (4) (p0.05). Conclusion: (1) the index of anaerobic power in upper limb of athletes is significantly better than that of non-athletes. (2) the anti-fatigue ability of upper limb muscles was better than that of lower extremity muscles. (3) there was no significant difference in Wingate anaerobic power between the two groups. The suggestions are as follows: (1) height and arm exhibition may have a certain influence on the Powerslap test results, so we should make a comprehensive comparison and analysis. (2) We can try to apply the Wingate anaerobic experiment to the training of rock climbing. It can also be used as a new way to evaluate and monitor the training effect. (3) when Wingate anaerobic experiment is applied to actual training, its content and purpose should focus on improving AP and reducing PD.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G881;G804.49

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 羅智;不同項(xiàng)目男子上肢無(wú)氧功率的比較[J];體育學(xué)刊;2002年04期

2 羅智;無(wú)氧功率的測(cè)定方法與評(píng)價(jià)[J];山西師大體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

3 劉林豐,陳家琦,高增謙;縱跳無(wú)氧功率測(cè)試的可行性及間接評(píng)定法的研究[J];天津體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1990年01期

4 洪濤，范躍，楊善君;臺(tái)階無(wú)氧功率實(shí)驗(yàn)方法新探[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年01期

5 楊善君,洪濤,于聯(lián)志,王志翔,范躍;絕對(duì)臺(tái)階無(wú)氧功率和相對(duì)臺(tái)階無(wú)氧功率的實(shí)用價(jià)值[J];體育學(xué)刊;1997年01期

6 方芳,高建國(guó);無(wú)氧功率與肥胖[J];中國(guó)學(xué)校體育;1999年04期

7 羅智,王翔;男子上肢無(wú)氧功率測(cè)定方法之研究[J];湖北體育科技;2003年02期

8 熊開(kāi)宇,王德剛,許壽生;簡(jiǎn)易無(wú)氧功率測(cè)試設(shè)備的制作與應(yīng)用[J];沈陽(yáng)體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

9 烏云格日勒;特木其勒?qǐng)D;路生;姜曉珍;孟克滿都呼;滿喜;金寅淳;;田徑競(jìng)賽運(yùn)動(dòng)員無(wú)氧功率及其衰減曲線特性的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)漢文版);2008年02期

10 羅智,雷艷云;力量、速度與無(wú)氧功率[J];韶關(guān)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);1997年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 馬鐵;彭如心;;不同群體大學(xué)生相對(duì)最大無(wú)氧功率與肌電參數(shù)相關(guān)性的研究[A];2011年中國(guó)生理學(xué)會(huì)運(yùn)動(dòng)生理學(xué)專業(yè)委員會(huì)會(huì)議暨“運(yùn)動(dòng)與骨骼肌”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

2 劉敏;陳文鶴;許汪宇;;上海優(yōu)秀1500米運(yùn)動(dòng)員沖刺能力的研究[A];第八屆全國(guó)體育科學(xué)大會(huì)論文摘要匯編（二）[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳育波;高校攀巖運(yùn)動(dòng)員上、下肢Wingate無(wú)氧功率測(cè)定及身體成分的研究[D];上海體育學(xué)院;2017年

2 陳波;髖受力后蹬式Wingate無(wú)氧功率測(cè)試法的生物學(xué)特征分析[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2197238