本文選題：CBA聯(lián)賽 + 產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)�。� 參考：《北京體育大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：自1995年我國(guó)籃球聯(lián)賽進(jìn)行職業(yè)化改革已經(jīng)過(guò)去20多年了。CBA聯(lián)賽先后經(jīng)歷了八強(qiáng)賽、升降級(jí)制和俱樂(lè)部準(zhǔn)入制的變化,產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)也在不斷調(diào)整,職業(yè)籃球聯(lián)賽的革新進(jìn)步為我國(guó)職業(yè)體育的發(fā)展做出了巨大的貢獻(xiàn)。盡管如此,CBA聯(lián)賽仍處于發(fā)展的探索階段。近年來(lái)CBA在推進(jìn)職業(yè)化進(jìn)程中出現(xiàn)了一系列問(wèn)題,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)主要集中在產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)的不合理和治理結(jié)構(gòu)的缺陷。根據(jù)產(chǎn)權(quán)理論,產(chǎn)權(quán)的安排密切影響著資源的配置,是形成治理結(jié)構(gòu)的基礎(chǔ)。綜上,本文主要運(yùn)用產(chǎn)權(quán)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)中的產(chǎn)權(quán)理論和企業(yè)產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)理論對(duì)CBA聯(lián)賽的產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了分析,并結(jié)合利益相關(guān)者理論在我國(guó)國(guó)情基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)CBA聯(lián)賽治理結(jié)構(gòu)的改進(jìn)和完善提出了意見(jiàn)與建議。以理論與實(shí)際相結(jié)合的方式分析CBA聯(lián)賽當(dāng)前問(wèn)題,從而促進(jìn)我國(guó)體育產(chǎn)業(yè)的良性發(fā)展。本文得出結(jié)論如下:1.CBA聯(lián)賽的利益相關(guān)者包括籃球俱樂(lè)部、運(yùn)動(dòng)員和教練員、贊助商、球迷與媒體、地方政府、籃協(xié)和相關(guān)工作人員等對(duì)聯(lián)賽進(jìn)行專用性投資的個(gè)人和群體,聯(lián)賽的治理結(jié)構(gòu)應(yīng)該權(quán)衡到他們的利益。2.CBA聯(lián)賽產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)的特點(diǎn)表現(xiàn)為:聯(lián)賽所有權(quán)由國(guó)家所有,側(cè)重政治目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn);聯(lián)賽產(chǎn)權(quán)主體多元化,關(guān)系復(fù)雜,模糊產(chǎn)權(quán)特征顯著;籃協(xié)與CBA俱樂(lè)部間的產(chǎn)權(quán)表現(xiàn)為殘缺產(chǎn)權(quán)。3.CBA聯(lián)賽產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)存在的問(wèn)題:產(chǎn)權(quán)束不夠完整,聯(lián)賽利益非最大化;籃協(xié)擁CBA聯(lián)賽所有權(quán)理論上不合理;殘缺產(chǎn)權(quán)違背了風(fēng)險(xiǎn)補(bǔ)償原則;產(chǎn)權(quán)主體多元、利益目標(biāo)函數(shù)不一致,模糊產(chǎn)權(quán)激發(fā)矛盾。4.CBA聯(lián)賽治理結(jié)構(gòu)的缺陷表現(xiàn)在,籃協(xié)方面:代理環(huán)節(jié)繁多,代理成本較大;俱樂(lè)部方面:產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)模糊且收入分配不合理;媒體和球迷方面:地位沒(méi)有得到足夠重視;運(yùn)動(dòng)員方面:轉(zhuǎn)會(huì)與人力資本權(quán)益的缺陷;治理機(jī)制紊亂:籃協(xié)激勵(lì)機(jī)制與約束機(jī)制“失效”。5.CBA聯(lián)賽產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)是聯(lián)賽利益相關(guān)者適應(yīng)我國(guó)國(guó)情而不斷調(diào)整所構(gòu)建的穩(wěn)定關(guān)系,有一定的過(guò)渡期合理性。CBA聯(lián)賽的治理結(jié)構(gòu)問(wèn)題可以通過(guò)產(chǎn)權(quán)的“漸進(jìn)式”改革、利益相關(guān)者法人治理結(jié)構(gòu)的構(gòu)建與治理機(jī)制的完善來(lái)進(jìn)行參考解決。
[Abstract]:Since 1995, the professional reform of basketball league has been carried out in our country for more than 20 years. The CBA league has experienced the changes of the last eight matches, the upgrade system and the club admission system, and the structure of property rights has been constantly adjusted. The innovation and progress of professional basketball league has made great contribution to the development of professional sports in China. Nevertheless, the CBA league is still in the exploratory stage of development. In recent years, CBA has appeared a series of problems in the process of promoting professionalization. The research found that the main focus is on the unreasonable property rights structure and the defects of governance structure. According to the theory of property right, the arrangement of property right affects the allocation of resources closely and is the foundation of governance structure. In summary, this paper analyzes the property right structure of CBA league by using property right theory and enterprise property right structure theory in property right economics. Based on the theory of stakeholders, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the improvement and improvement of the CBA league governance structure on the basis of our country's national conditions. This paper analyzes the current problems of CBA league matches by combining theory with practice, so as to promote the benign development of China's sports industry. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: 1. The stakeholders of the CBA league include basketball clubs, athletes and coaches, sponsors, fans and media, local governments, basketball associations and related staff, and so on. The management structure of the league should weigh their interests. 2. The characteristics of the property right structure of the CBA league are as follows: the ownership of the league is owned by the state, the realization of the political goal is emphasized, the main body of the property right of the league is diversified, the relationship is complex, and the characteristic of the fuzzy property right is obvious; The property rights between the basketball association and the CBA club are incomplete property rights. 3. The problems in the property right structure of the league are: the property rights bundles are not complete, the league interests are not maximized, the ownership of the CBA league is unreasonable in theory; Incomplete property right violates the principle of risk compensation, the main body of property right is pluralistic, the objective function of interest is not consistent, the contradiction of fuzzy property right stimulates the contradiction. 4. The defects of the governing structure of CBA league are as follows: there are many agent links and the agency cost is large; Club: property rights structure is vague and income distribution is unreasonable; media and fans: status has not been paid enough attention; athletes: transfer and human capital rights and interests defects; Governance mechanism disorder: Basketball Association incentive mechanism and constraint mechanism "invalidation" .5.The property right structure of CBA league is the stable relationship constructed by the league stakeholders adapting to the national conditions of our country. The governance structure of CBA league can be solved through the reform of property rights, the construction of corporate governance structure of stakeholders and the perfection of governance mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邢中有;;2008-2009賽季CBA聯(lián)賽后衛(wèi)狀況研究[J];遼寧體育科技;2010年03期

2 陳中林;CBA聯(lián)賽中外優(yōu)秀前鋒主要技術(shù)參數(shù)比較分析[J];西安體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

3 孟祥軍;賈美鳳;;國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)與外援后衛(wèi)技術(shù)指標(biāo)比較分析——以2010～2011 CBA聯(lián)賽為例[J];內(nèi)江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

4 牛同舟;王亞男;;關(guān)于CBA聯(lián)賽電視轉(zhuǎn)播的思考[J];新課程(教育學(xué)術(shù));2010年12期

5 周巖峰;;CBA聯(lián)賽上座率與俱樂(lè)部收益的關(guān)聯(lián)分析[J];沈陽(yáng)體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

6 竇忠霞;;CBA聯(lián)賽產(chǎn)權(quán)的結(jié)構(gòu)研究[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

7 李鵬;鄒玉玲;劉照宇;;對(duì)CBA聯(lián)賽吸引力結(jié)構(gòu)與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的探討[J];首都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

8 霍笑敏;吳慶龍;趙雨;;改革俱樂(lè)部產(chǎn)權(quán)制度促進(jìn)CBA聯(lián)賽健康發(fā)展的研究[J];搏擊(體育論壇);2011年08期

9 羅立;評(píng)“三人制”裁判法對(duì)CBA聯(lián)賽的推動(dòng)作用[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

10 夏春,馬曉蔚;CBA聯(lián)賽中三人制與二人制裁判錯(cuò)漏判的比較[J];體育與科學(xué);2003年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 張四清;林甲換;;CBA聯(lián)賽外籍球員特征研究[A];第十八屆全國(guó)高校田徑科研論文報(bào)告會(huì)論文專輯[C];2008年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 張品;CBA聯(lián)賽辦公室回應(yīng)俱樂(lè)部準(zhǔn)入質(zhì)疑[N];中國(guó)體育報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張馱;2014-2015賽季CBA聯(lián)賽季后賽遼寧隊(duì)比賽狀況的分析研究[D];首都體育學(xué)院;2016年

2 徐亞北;14-15賽季CBA聯(lián)賽實(shí)施末節(jié)單外援政策對(duì)本土球員的影響[D];北京體育大學(xué);2016年

3 董星宇;CBA20年引進(jìn)外援對(duì)聯(lián)賽影響研究[D];牡丹江師范學(xué)院;2016年

4 劉世杰;CBA聯(lián)賽半職業(yè)化裁判員現(xiàn)狀與職業(yè)化路徑研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2016年

5 王藝杰;CBA聯(lián)賽亞洲外援政策對(duì)本土球員的影響研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

6 李鑫;NBA與CBA聯(lián)賽大數(shù)據(jù)應(yīng)用的對(duì)比研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

7 黃少好;產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)視角下CBA聯(lián)賽治理結(jié)構(gòu)的研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2017年

8 李川東;CBA聯(lián)賽的競(jìng)技格局及俱樂(lè)部發(fā)展特征研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2017年

9 連震;CBA聯(lián)賽明星球員轉(zhuǎn)會(huì)現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策研究[D];河南大學(xué);2014年

10 孫良平;CBA聯(lián)賽山東賽區(qū)賽事觀賞市場(chǎng)影響因素研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1908489