本文選題：NBA + CBA��； 參考：《成都體育學院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著籃球職業(yè)賽事的不斷發(fā)展,競技水平愈來愈高,各聯盟內球隊之間水平差異也不斷縮小。常常會在比賽中出現常規(guī)時間未分勝負的情況,這就出現了很多加時決勝的情況。而每一加時又僅有五分鐘的比賽時間,選擇高效的技戰(zhàn)術打法是贏球的關鍵。NBA是當今世界發(fā)展最好的籃球賽事,其水平遠高于CBA,有很多優(yōu)秀的地方值得CBA借鑒和學習。通過對NBA、CBA加時賽視頻的觀察,并記錄相關的數據進行對比分析,探尋獲勝球隊在進攻技戰(zhàn)術安排上的共性以及CBA與NBA在加時賽表現的異同,并對加時期間技戰(zhàn)術安排提出相關的建議。文章采用文獻資料法、數理統(tǒng)計法、視頻觀察法、比較分析法以及邏輯推理法,以NBA、CBA加時期間進攻戰(zhàn)術安排為研究對象,并統(tǒng)計其中加時賽中的常規(guī)戰(zhàn)術的使用和非常規(guī)戰(zhàn)術的使用。常規(guī)戰(zhàn)術是指比賽中個人單打進攻和團隊參與的擋拆配合、傳切配合等戰(zhàn)術,非常規(guī)戰(zhàn)術是指比賽中的搶攻戰(zhàn)術、暫停戰(zhàn)術、擲界外球戰(zhàn)術等。探求勝負球隊在加時賽進攻技戰(zhàn)術選擇上的差異、NBA和CBA在加時賽中技戰(zhàn)術選擇的區(qū)別以及影響加時賽戰(zhàn)術安排的主要因素。主要研究成果如下:(1)加時賽獲勝球隊與失利球隊在進攻戰(zhàn)術選擇的相同點:個人戰(zhàn)術成為加時賽進最主要的進攻方式;獲勝球隊會選擇更多的團隊技戰(zhàn)術完成進攻;在出手位置的選擇主要集中在限制區(qū)和三分線外,都忽視了三分線內中間區(qū)域的利用;從得分分布來看,限制區(qū)是最主要的得分位置,其次罰球對加時賽影響愈來愈大;而NBA與CBA加時賽技戰(zhàn)術選擇不同點在于:CBA在進攻選擇時利用個人能力完成進攻更多,在出手位置選擇時CBA三分線外出手比例更大。(2)加時賽最后階段非常規(guī)戰(zhàn)術的使用越來越頻繁,非常規(guī)戰(zhàn)術大多是落后球隊在比賽最后階段不得已而使用的戰(zhàn)術安排,影響加時賽非常戰(zhàn)術使用最直接的因素就是時間和比分。主要包括:搶攻戰(zhàn)術、犯規(guī)戰(zhàn)術、請求暫停、擲界外球戰(zhàn)術、最后一攻戰(zhàn)術安排。主要的建議有:(1)利用團隊的力量打好加時,在技戰(zhàn)術安排時應重視對限制區(qū)的利用。(2)重視加時賽開局戰(zhàn)術安排,努力打好開局。(3)球隊球星和外援對加時賽影響越來越大。(4)根據場上不同的態(tài)勢安排即時有效的戰(zhàn)術。(5)NBA、CBA競技水平差距明顯,加強CBA球隊競技水平的提高。
[Abstract]:With the development of professional basketball events, the competitive level is getting higher and higher. There is a lot of overtime to win or lose in a regular game. And each extra time is only five minutes of competition time, the choice of efficient technical and tactical play is the key to win. The NBA is the world's best basketball game, its level is far higher than the CBA, there are many excellent places to learn and learn from CBA. By observing the video of NBA CBA overtime, and comparing and analyzing the relevant data, this paper explores the general character of the winning team in attacking tactics and arrangement, and the similarities and differences between CBA and NBA in overtime. And the technical and tactical arrangements during the overtime to put forward the relevant suggestions. In this paper, the methods of literature, mathematical statistics, video observation, comparative analysis and logical reasoning are used to study the offensive tactics of NBACBA during the overtime period. And count the use of conventional tactics and unconventional tactics in overtime. Conventional tactics refer to the tactics of individual single attack and team participation in the match, such as the cooperation of baffle and tangent, etc. Unconventional tactics refer to the tactics of attack, pause, throw and so on. To find out the difference in the choice of offensive techniques and tactics between the winning and losing teams in extra time the differences between NBA and CBA in overtime and the main factors affecting the tactical arrangement of overtime are discussed. The main research results are as follows: (1) the choice of offensive tactics between the winning team and the losing team in overtime is the same: personal tactics become the most important attack mode, the winning team will choose more teams to complete the attack. The choice of shooting position is mainly focused on the restricted zone and the three-point line, ignoring the utilization of the middle area in the three-point line, the restricted zone is the most important scoring position, and the second penalty is more and more important to the overtime game. And the difference between NBA and CBA overtime is that the NBA makes more use of their personal ability to complete the attack. The proportion of outfielder in the CBA three-point line is more and more. 2) the use of unconventional tactics is more and more frequent in the final stage of overtime, and most of the unconventional tactics are the tactical arrangement that backward teams have to use in the final stage of the game. The most direct factor affecting the use of extra-time extraordinary tactics is time and score. Mainly include: attack tactics, foul tactics, request suspension, throw ball tactics, the last attack tactical arrangements. The main suggestions are: 1) make use of the strength of the team to play overtime, in technical and tactical arrangements, we should pay attention to the use of restricted zones. Try hard to make a good start. 3) the influence of star and foreign aid on overtime is more and more great. 4) according to the different situation on the court, the effective tactics are arranged immediately and effectively. The gap of competitive level of CBA team is obvious, and the improvement of CBA team's competitive level is strengthened.
【學位授予單位】：成都體育學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：G841

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 金加升;現代籃球比賽過程階段劃分及其一般應對策略[J];北京體育大學學報;2005年09期

，

本文編號：1876384