發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-06 08:41

  本文選題：政策工具 + 政策文本內(nèi)容　； 參考：《沈陽(yáng)體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)》2017年03期

【摘要】：基于政策工具分析法的理論框架,從X和Y兩個(gè)維度分別對(duì)美國(guó)《國(guó)民體力活動(dòng)計(jì)劃(2016—2020年)》和中國(guó)《全民健身計(jì)劃(2016—2020年)》的政策文本內(nèi)容進(jìn)行分類篩選、內(nèi)容編碼與計(jì)量等比較分析。研究認(rèn)為,在《國(guó)民體力活動(dòng)計(jì)劃(2016—2020年)》中,政策工具類型運(yùn)用合理,供給型和需求型政策工具處于均衡,比例均為29.55%,推動(dòng)和拉動(dòng)效用較為顯著,環(huán)境型政策工具運(yùn)用恰當(dāng),比例為40.90%;體育與教育、醫(yī)療、衛(wèi)生等政策內(nèi)容協(xié)調(diào)運(yùn)行;非政府、非營(yíng)利社會(huì)組織是其重要?jiǎng)?chuàng)新舉措。在《全民健身計(jì)劃(2016—2020年)》中,政策工具類型運(yùn)用不合理,供給型和需求型政策工具使用不均衡,所占比例為37.89%、5.27%,環(huán)境型政策工具使用過(guò)溢,所占比例為56.84%;主要通過(guò)管理體制創(chuàng)新、體育產(chǎn)業(yè)市場(chǎng)、體育社會(huì)組織和公共體育服務(wù)體系等政策內(nèi)容進(jìn)行適度干預(yù);群眾健身需求和健身項(xiàng)目供給明顯不足。通過(guò)比較分析,希望對(duì)完善和優(yōu)化我國(guó)全民健身政策文本有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Based on the theoretical framework of the policy tool analysis method, the contents of the policy texts of the National physical activity Program of the United States (2016-2020) and the Chinese National Fitness Program (2016-2020) were classified and screened from the X and Y dimensions, respectively. Comparative analysis of content coding and measurement. The study shows that in the National physical activity Plan 2016-2020, the types of policy instruments are reasonable, the supply and demand policy instruments are balanced, the proportion is 29.55, and the effect of promoting and pulling is obvious. The environmental policy tools are used properly, the proportion is 40.90. Sports and education, medical treatment, health and other policy contents work in harmony. Non-government and non-profit social organizations are its important innovative measures. In the National Fitness Plan 2016-2020, the use of policy tools is unreasonable, and the use of supply-and demand-oriented policy instruments is not balanced, accounting for 37.89% of the total. The proportion is 56.84; mainly through the management system innovation, sports industry market, sports social organization and public sports service system and other policy content appropriate intervention; the mass fitness demand and fitness items supply is obviously insufficient. Through comparative analysis, we hope to improve and optimize our national fitness policy text.
【作者單位】： 玉溪師范學(xué)院體育學(xué)院;華南師范大學(xué)體育科學(xué)學(xué)院;安徽師范大學(xué)體育學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目:網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理下中美全民健身計(jì)劃協(xié)同路徑比較研究(16BTY074) 2015年度玉溪師范學(xué)院首批青年骨干教師培養(yǎng)資助項(xiàng)目
【分類號(hào)】：G811.4
，

本文編號(hào)：1851590