本文選題：女排 + 排球攔網(wǎng)　； 參考：《西南大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國女排作為國內(nèi)集體球類項目中唯一在奧運會中奪得過金牌的隊伍,早已成為一種精神,影響著一代代華人。在2016年的里約奧運會中,女排再次成功奪冠。無疑又一次振奮了國人。登頂世界之巔故然可喜,看清優(yōu)勢與不足同樣必不可少。本研究以里約奧運會女子排球比賽為研究背景,將研究范圍限定在攔網(wǎng)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)上,以對此單一環(huán)節(jié)進行深度探究,選取里約奧運會中女子排球比賽前8強球隊為統(tǒng)計對象,運用文獻資料法、專家訪談法、錄像觀察法、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計法對各隊在比賽中攔網(wǎng)技術(shù)應(yīng)用效果從多角度進行比較分析。進而得出以下結(jié)論:1.國外球隊在針對不同進攻形式時攔網(wǎng)效果對比分析中,荷蘭隊對4號位平拉開進攻的攔防最為出色,且攔2號位平拉開的效果也較好,塞爾維亞的兩側(cè)防守則存在明顯不均衡性,攔防4號位調(diào)整強攻的效果上巴西女排表現(xiàn)最出色,攔防2號位快攻中美國、荷蘭做得最出色。當進攻方前排三點攻時,塞爾維亞女排的攔網(wǎng)效果最好;在攔防前排兩點攻時,巴西女排的攔防效果最佳。2.中國隊對2號位、4號位的平拉開進攻和調(diào)整強攻攔防的表現(xiàn)上均處于中上等水平,同時對后排3號位和2號位的攔防也排在8支球隊的前列,但對2號位的背飛、背快等快球打法防守較差。3.通過對個位置運動員的攔網(wǎng)效果進行分析后得出巴西隊主攻、美國隊副攻、塞爾維亞隊接應(yīng)、塞爾維亞隊二傳是各自位置上攔網(wǎng)效果最好的運動員。4.根據(jù)統(tǒng)計學里相關(guān)性分析得出對2、4號位調(diào)整攻、3號位快球進攻的攔防效果與比賽成績的相關(guān)性最高。5對奧運會排球比賽中的針對進攻方一傳到位情況下守方單人攔網(wǎng)和雙人攔網(wǎng)和進攻方一傳不到位時守方攔網(wǎng)三種形式分別進行了博弈分析,并分別求出了各自的納什均衡,通過此方法提出了攔網(wǎng)的優(yōu)化策略。
[Abstract]:As the only team that has won the gold medal in the Olympic Games, the Chinese women's volleyball team has become a spirit that has influenced generations of Chinese. At the 2016 Rio Olympics, the women's volleyball team won the title again. There is no doubt that once again inspired the people of China. To the top of the world, it is gratifying to see the advantages and disadvantages as necessary. This research takes the women's volleyball match of Rio Olympic Games as the research background, limits the research scope to the blocking technique and tactics, carries on the deep research to this single link, selects the top 8 teams of the women's volleyball match in the Rio Olympic Games as the statistical object. By using the methods of literature, expert interview, video observation and mathematical statistics, the effects of blocking technology applied in competitions are compared and analyzed from various angles. Then draw the following conclusion: 1. In the comparative analysis of the blocking effect of foreign teams in view of different offensive forms, the Dutch team is the most excellent in blocking and defending the attack of No. 4 level, and the effect of blocking the second level is also better. Serbia's defense on both sides of the obvious imbalance, blocking the fourth position to adjust the effect of strong attack in the Brazilian women's volleyball team is the best performance, the United States, the United States, the Netherlands did the best. The Serbian women's volleyball team had the best blocking effect when attacking the front row and the Brazilian women's volleyball team had the best blocking effect. The Chinese team was in the middle and upper-class level in both the second and fourth positions, and the third and second positions in the back row were also in the forefront of the eight teams, but they were in the back of the No. 2 position on the back of the line, but on the back of the No. 2 position the Chinese team was in the forefront of the eight teams, but they were flying back to the No. 2 position. Fast back, fast ball, poor defense. 3. By analyzing the blocking effect of the players in each position, it is concluded that the main attack of Brazil, the secondary attack of American team, the response of Serbian team, and the second pass of Serbian team are the best players in their respective positions. According to the correlation analysis in statistics, it is concluded that the effect of blocking and defense of attacking position 2 and 4 and the attacking effect of fast ball in position 3 is the highest relative to the result of the match. 5. 5 in the volleyball match of the Olympic Games, the single person of the defending side under the condition of one pass from the attacking side is in place. The game analysis of three types of blocking, blocking, double blocking and attacking side when the first pass is not in place, is carried out respectively. The Nash equilibrium is obtained, and the optimization strategy of blocking is put forward by this method.
【學位授予單位】：西南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G842

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郝霖霖;葛春林;古松;水yN舟;傅鴻浩;;中國女排與巴、美、日、意女排攔防效果及站位對比分析[J];北京體育大學學報;2015年12期

2 郝霖霖;葛春林;于作軍;;中國女排與巴西女排集體攔網(wǎng)戰(zhàn)術(shù)運用分析[J];中國體育科技;2015年02期

3 郝霖霖;葛春林;錢俊偉;于作軍;;排球競賽中戰(zhàn)術(shù)行為決策的混合策略納什均衡研究[J];南京體育學院學報(社會科學版);2015年01期

4 劉文明;楊忠令;樓恒陽;;網(wǎng)球戰(zhàn)術(shù)行為“混合策略”理論驗證[J];北京體育大學學報;2014年08期

5 肖勇;;第30屆倫敦奧運會女排不同攔網(wǎng)陣型下256種“攻-防”組合模式技術(shù)效果比較研究[J];山東體育學院學報;2013年05期

6 曹慶雷;張高飛;王二霞;;第30屆奧運會中外女排攔網(wǎng)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)運用特點和效果的對比分析[J];安徽體育科技;2013年04期

7 孟春雷;李毅鈞;;中外優(yōu)秀女排運動員攔網(wǎng)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)的比較研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2013年05期

8 劉文明;唐建軍;;乒乓球戰(zhàn)術(shù)行為博弈分析的理論體系建構(gòu)[J];浙江體育科學;2012年06期

9 華蒙尉;;上海女排加強攔網(wǎng)判斷能力的訓(xùn)練手段[J];體育科研;2012年05期

10 劉文明;唐建軍;;乒乓球競賽發(fā)球與接發(fā)球博弈的混合策略納什均衡研究[J];北京體育大學學報;2012年08期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 陳家鳴;乒乓球比賽戰(zhàn)術(shù)的博弈分析[D];北京體育大學;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前6條

1 王冉;上海男排與主要對手副攻隊員進攻、攔網(wǎng)效果及評價研究[D];上海體育學院;2014年

2 胡正;高水平羽毛球比賽男子單打發(fā)球戰(zhàn)術(shù)的博弈分析[D];華中師范大學;2013年

3 張明曦;對中國國家男子排球隊運動員攔網(wǎng)移動距離的測量與分析[D];北京體育大學;2012年

4 趙凱;男子排球副攻隊員右側(cè)交叉步攔網(wǎng)快速移動的動作分析[D];北京體育大學;2012年

5 于雷;中國女子排球攔網(wǎng)技術(shù)運用的時空分析[D];遼寧師范大學;2011年

6 王詠梅;近兩年世界女子排球賽上中國女排攻防技戰(zhàn)術(shù)效果的分析研究[D];蘇州大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1811772