本文選題：籃球 + 選材��； 參考：《山東體育學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：研究目的:運(yùn)動員選材是直接或間接地發(fā)現(xiàn)運(yùn)動員在某運(yùn)動項(xiàng)目上的天賦,初步分析預(yù)測其未來的競技能力�？茖W(xué)選材是依據(jù)科學(xué)的原理和方法,篩選優(yōu)秀運(yùn)動員苗子的過程�；@球運(yùn)動員的選材就是通過科學(xué)的方法手段從少年兒童中挑選出先天條件優(yōu)越,適合從事籃球運(yùn)動的人材。以期望通過進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的有目的的培養(yǎng)和訓(xùn)練,成長為優(yōu)秀的籃球運(yùn)動員。我省的選材標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為八十年代制定,諸多指標(biāo)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不能滿足現(xiàn)代運(yùn)動訓(xùn)練的需要。本研究旨在在前人研究基礎(chǔ)上,重新審視并制定新的選材指標(biāo),建立評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),為我省籃球青少年選材提供參考。研究方法:1.對運(yùn)動員科學(xué)選材專家進(jìn)行訪談,發(fā)放三輪問卷,通過專家問卷,對指標(biāo)進(jìn)行權(quán)重賦值,確定選材指標(biāo)。2.根據(jù)高水平教練員、相關(guān)專家意見,選取400名青少年籃球運(yùn)動員進(jìn)行測試,記錄成績進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。3.根據(jù)400名青少年籃球運(yùn)動員在身體形態(tài)、機(jī)能、素質(zhì)、專項(xiàng)技能和心理素質(zhì)的成績,制定評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。4.運(yùn)用新的評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),重新選取同年齡段運(yùn)動員進(jìn)行測試,與教練員的評分比較,測試結(jié)果與高水平教練員評分基本一致。研究結(jié)果:通過測試和數(shù)據(jù)分析,構(gòu)建9-18歲青少年籃球運(yùn)動員身體形態(tài)(身高、指距),身體機(jī)能(心功指數(shù)、肺活量、最大攝氧量),身體素質(zhì)(折返跑、摸高),專項(xiàng)技能(運(yùn)球、投籃、傳球),心理指標(biāo)(反應(yīng)時)的指標(biāo)體系,通過測試評分建立評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和單項(xiàng)評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。建立的青少年籃球運(yùn)動員的評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與各單項(xiàng)的評分系統(tǒng)可用于9-18歲的青少年籃球運(yùn)動員選材工作。研究結(jié)論:1.籃球運(yùn)動員選材以身體形態(tài)、身體機(jī)能、身體素質(zhì)、專項(xiàng)能力和心理素質(zhì)為基本指標(biāo),能夠較為科學(xué)的判斷其未來發(fā)展水平。2.9-18歲青少年男女運(yùn)動員在各項(xiàng)評價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)隨年齡漸次提高,并且有性別差異,心理指標(biāo)除外。3.運(yùn)動員存在個體差異,選材指標(biāo)不是萬能的,選材工作是一個長期的過程,因此,在應(yīng)用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)過程中應(yīng)該結(jié)合實(shí)際情況進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to find out directly or indirectly the talent of athletes in a certain sport and to analyze and predict their future competitive ability.Scientific material selection is the process of selecting elite athletes according to the principles and methods of science.The selection of basketball players is to select the talents who are suitable for basketball by scientific means.Expected through systematic and purposeful training and training, to grow into an excellent basketball player.The material selection standard of our province is formulated in 1980's, many index standards are far from meeting the needs of modern sports training.On the basis of previous studies, this study aims to re-examine and formulate new selection indicators, establish evaluation criteria, and provide a reference for basketball youth selection in our province.Research method: 1.The scientific selection experts of athletes were interviewed, three rounds of questionnaires were issued, through expert questionnaires, the weights of the indicators were assigned to determine the selection index. 2.According to the high level coaches and related expert opinions, 400 young basketball players were selected for the test, and the results were recorded and analyzed statistically. 3.According to the achievements of 400 juvenile basketball players in body form, function, quality, special skill and psychological quality, the scoring standard .4.Using the new evaluation standard, the athletes of the same age were re-selected for the test. Compared with the coaches' scores, the test results were basically consistent with the high-level coaches' scores.Results: through testing and data analysis, the body shape (height, finger distance, body function (cardiac work index, vital capacity, maximal oxygen intake), physical quality (running back) of 9-18 years old basketball players were constructed.The index system of special skill (dribble, shooting, passing, psychological index (reaction time)) was established by testing and scoring.The evaluation criteria and individual scoring system of juvenile basketball players can be applied to the selection of young basketball players aged 9-18 years.Conclusion: 1.The basic indicators of basketball players' selection are body form, body function, physical quality, special ability and psychological quality.Can scientifically judge its future development level. 2.9-18 years old young male and female athletes in each evaluation standard gradually improved with age, and there are gender differences, except psychological indicators. 3.There are individual differences in athletes, the selection index is not omnipotent, the selection of materials is a long-term process, therefore, in the application of the standard process should be combined with the actual situation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東體育學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G841

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 劉偉;;美國運(yùn)動員培養(yǎng)模式研究[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

2 董順波;于振峰;;對我國甲級女籃2006年夏訓(xùn)體能和基本技術(shù)的測試分析[J];首都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

3 胡安義;劉景裕;;青少年籃球運(yùn)動員選材模型的構(gòu)建與應(yīng)用[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

4 翟強(qiáng);對籃球運(yùn)動員選材的新探討[J];沈陽體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

5 梁建平,何建文;籃球運(yùn)動員身體素質(zhì)訓(xùn)練的特性[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2000年01期

6 王守恒,薛正武,曾凡星,朱浩;少年籃球運(yùn)動員身體機(jī)能和素質(zhì)變化的研究[J];體育科學(xué);2000年01期

7 劉玉林,白喜林;從籃球后備力量看我國的籃球運(yùn)動水平[J];中國體育科技;1998年08期

8 朱體荃;;籃球運(yùn)動員的選材[J];中國體育科技;1989年12期

9 趙映輝;籃球運(yùn)動員選材方法研究的綜述[J];西安體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1986年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 周亞林;中國優(yōu)秀青年男子籃球運(yùn)動員身體形態(tài)與機(jī)能狀態(tài)研究[D];云南師范大學(xué);2014年

2 韓w，

本文編號：1746375