本文選題：28屆亞錦賽　切入點(diǎn)：男籃中鋒　出處：《吉首大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在籃球比賽中,中鋒位置是對(duì)抗競(jìng)爭(zhēng)最為激烈的區(qū)域,也是開展戰(zhàn)術(shù)配合的關(guān)鍵樞紐,中鋒在籃下進(jìn)攻距離籃下最近,能夠最為直接給對(duì)手創(chuàng)造得分威脅,同時(shí),也擔(dān)任爭(zhēng)搶籃板,并重新組織發(fā)動(dòng)進(jìn)攻,中鋒隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的高低往往直接決定比賽的勝負(fù)。通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)資料、專家訪談、現(xiàn)場(chǎng)觀摩與錄像觀察、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)、邏輯分析等方法,以28屆亞錦賽前四名國(guó)家隊(duì)男籃中鋒進(jìn)攻能力為研究對(duì)象,較為全面地分析中國(guó)男籃中鋒隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的優(yōu)勢(shì)和不足,并提出有針對(duì)的發(fā)展建議。主要得出以下研究結(jié)論:1)中國(guó)男籃中鋒隊(duì)員的身高與伊朗隊(duì)和日本隊(duì)相比具有明顯優(yōu)勢(shì),具備世界優(yōu)秀中鋒的身高標(biāo)準(zhǔn),體重、克托萊指數(shù)和勞雷爾指數(shù)均低于亞洲強(qiáng)隊(duì)中鋒;中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒也是最為年輕的隊(duì)員,但比賽經(jīng)驗(yàn)不足。2)中國(guó)男籃在28屆亞錦賽中的場(chǎng)均得分低于菲律賓和伊朗,場(chǎng)均失分高于伊朗;中國(guó)隊(duì)一號(hào)中鋒的場(chǎng)均得分低于菲律賓隊(duì)和伊朗隊(duì);中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒隊(duì)員的得分占全隊(duì)得分的比重較低,均低于菲律賓、伊朗和日本,得分效率較低。3)中國(guó)男籃一號(hào)中鋒周琦的2分球命中率優(yōu)于亞洲其他強(qiáng)隊(duì)中鋒,亞洲強(qiáng)隊(duì)中鋒3分出手隊(duì)員的出手頻次、命中率較低;中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒隊(duì)員的罰球命中率與亞洲其他較為優(yōu)秀的強(qiáng)隊(duì)相比,具有一定優(yōu)勢(shì),與亞洲優(yōu)秀中鋒得分效率相比還存在一定差距。4)中國(guó)隊(duì)與日本隊(duì)中鋒主要采用固定搶位接球,移動(dòng)要位技戰(zhàn)術(shù)與亞洲其他強(qiáng)勢(shì)國(guó)家之間存在較大差異;中國(guó)隊(duì)與日本隊(duì)中鋒活動(dòng)區(qū)域主要集中在中、遠(yuǎn)區(qū),菲律賓隊(duì)和伊朗隊(duì)的活動(dòng)區(qū)域則主要集中在近區(qū)和中區(qū),表現(xiàn)出中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒身體對(duì)抗方面的不足;中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒在爭(zhēng)搶籃板能力方面能力不如亞洲強(qiáng)隊(duì)國(guó)家中鋒,特別是爭(zhēng)搶前場(chǎng)籃板的能力較差,助攻、搶斷方面的能力水平低于亞洲其他國(guó)家強(qiáng)隊(duì)中鋒,蓋帽能力較強(qiáng)。(5)中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒在參與掩護(hù)配合能力高于其他球隊(duì),掩護(hù)配合主要以側(cè)掩護(hù)為主,而前掩護(hù)運(yùn)用較少;中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒策應(yīng)戰(zhàn)術(shù)配合的使用低于菲律賓隊(duì)和伊朗隊(duì),配合方式主要以外策應(yīng)和高位策應(yīng)配合為主,內(nèi)策應(yīng)和低位策應(yīng)方面的戰(zhàn)術(shù)配合較少;中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒隊(duì)員突分配合方式主要以協(xié)防突分和突分補(bǔ)防為主,個(gè)人突分和突分接應(yīng)的使用頻次較少,中國(guó)男籃中鋒的協(xié)防突分和突分補(bǔ)防方面的意識(shí)和能力優(yōu)于其他國(guó)家中鋒隊(duì)員,而中鋒隊(duì)員的個(gè)人突分和突分接應(yīng)能力較差;中國(guó)隊(duì)中鋒隊(duì)員的傳切配合意識(shí)和能力優(yōu)于亞洲其他強(qiáng)隊(duì)中鋒,發(fā)動(dòng)組織能力不如菲律賓隊(duì)和伊朗隊(duì),切入能力均高于其他亞洲強(qiáng)隊(duì)中鋒,擺脫切入、擺脫防守能力較強(qiáng),與前鋒隊(duì)員之間的傳切配合使用頻次高于其他亞洲強(qiáng)隊(duì),而與后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員的傳切配合能力不足。
[Abstract]:In basketball games, the center position is the most competitive area and the key hub for tactical cooperation. The center can attack the nearest distance under the basket and create the most direct scoring threat to the opponent, at the same time, He also served as a rebounder and re-organized the offensive. The level of the attacking ability of the center often directly determines the result of the match. Through literature, expert interviews, on-site observation and video observation, mathematical statistics, logic analysis, and so on, Taking the attacking ability of the top four national team center in the 28 Asian Championship as the research object, this paper comprehensively analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the attacking ability of the Chinese men's basketball center. And put forward some suggestions for development. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) the height of the Chinese men's basketball center is obviously superior to that of the Iranian team and the Japanese team. It has the height standard and weight of the world's outstanding center forward. The Ketole Index and the Laurel Index are both lower than the center of the strong Asian team; the center of the Chinese team is also the youngest player, but inexperienced.) the average score of the Chinese men's basketball team in the 28th Asian Championship is lower than that of the Philippines and Iran. The average score of the center of the Chinese team is lower than that of the Filipino team and the Iranian team. The score of the Chinese team's center team is lower than that of the Philippines, Iran and Japan, and the percentage of the Chinese team's center players in the whole team's score is lower than that of the Philippines, Iran and Japan. China Men's Basketball team No. 1 center Zhou Qi's 2-point hit rate is better than the other Asian strong team center, the Asian strong team center's 3-point shot player's shooting frequency, the hit rate is low; Compared with other strong teams in Asia, the free throw shooting rate of Chinese team center players has certain advantages, and there is still a certain gap compared with the Asian excellent center forward scoring efficiency. 4) the center of Chinese team and Japan mainly use fixed position to catch the ball. There is a big difference between the technology and tactics of mobile positions and other strong countries in Asia. The areas where the center front of the Chinese team and the Japanese team are mainly concentrated in the middle and far areas, while the areas of activities of the Filipino team and the Iranian team are mainly concentrated in the near and central regions. It shows that the Chinese team's center has a lack of physical confrontation; the Chinese team's center is not as capable of competing for rebounds as the Asian strong national centers, especially the ability to compete for the front-court rebounds and assists. The ability level of steals is lower than that of other strong teams in Asia, and the ability of blocking shots is stronger than that of other teams. The use of tactical coordination of Chinese center forward response is lower than that of Filipino team and Iran team. The main ways of cooperation of Chinese team center team members' sudden points are the assistant defense points and the sudden points to supplement the defense, while the personal sudden scores and the sudden sub-points are used less frequently. The consciousness and ability of the Chinese men's basketball center in the aspects of assistant defense and sudden compensation is better than that of other national centers, but the individual sudden score and the sudden score of the center players are not as good as those of the other countries. The awareness and ability of the Chinese team's center in passing and coordinating with each other is superior to that of the other strong Asian teams, and the ability of launching and organizing is not as good as that of the Filipino team and the Iranian team, and the ability to cut through is higher than that of the other strong Asian team centers. The frequency of tangential coordination with strikers is higher than that of other strong Asian teams, but the ability of tangential coordination with defenders is insufficient.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉首大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：G841

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 師永斌;司磊;;第29、30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男籃8強(qiáng)賽制勝規(guī)律探究[J];安徽體育科技;2014年02期

2 田忠新;;2013年男籃亞錦賽中國(guó)隊(duì)失利因素與發(fā)展對(duì)策研究[J];體育文化導(dǎo)刊;2014年03期

3 馬金鳳;師永斌;;中美籃球著作中接球技術(shù)分析的比較[J];首都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

4 于洋;;從策應(yīng)戰(zhàn)術(shù)探究我國(guó)籃球中鋒的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];當(dāng)代體育科技;2014年02期

5 劉永峰;;倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃與競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手攻防能力的對(duì)比研究[J];成都體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年08期

6 林英常;;對(duì)在身體對(duì)抗條件下中鋒投籃命中率的諸因素影響探析[J];當(dāng)代體育科技;2013年21期

7 張耀軍;;現(xiàn)代籃球中鋒技術(shù)的發(fā)展方向淺析[J];科學(xué)大眾(科學(xué)教育);2013年04期

8 胡安義;汪曉琳;張文鎖;;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃攻防對(duì)抗分析與思考[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2013年01期

9 高治;任波;;第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃和對(duì)手搶攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用的比較[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期

10 劉海明;;論搶籃板球技術(shù)在比賽中的重要性[J];搏擊(體育論壇);2012年09期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋坤;中國(guó)男籃中鋒競(jìng)技能力的研究[D];成都體育學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1673868