本文選題：第29、30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)　切入點(diǎn)：進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征　出處：《北京體育大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文主要采用文獻(xiàn)調(diào)查法與錄像觀察法等研究方法,以第29屆與第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)隊(duì)進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征為研究對(duì)象,通過(guò)對(duì)中國(guó)隊(duì)在第29屆與第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征進(jìn)行對(duì)比,深入的探討和思考中國(guó)隊(duì)在兩屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中的進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征,總結(jié)并尋找中國(guó)隊(duì)競(jìng)技水平下降的原因,同時(shí)根據(jù)實(shí)際情況給出參考建議,為中國(guó)隊(duì)今后的發(fā)展提供支持。通過(guò)對(duì)兩屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)特征進(jìn)行對(duì)比得出了以下的結(jié)論：1.第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)隊(duì)快攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)的發(fā)動(dòng)與接應(yīng)區(qū)域較第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)更為分散,推進(jìn)方式與推進(jìn)路線較第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)更為集中,而在快攻結(jié)束階段形成人數(shù)相等或占優(yōu)情況明顯少于第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì),創(chuàng)造直接上籃形成一對(duì)一進(jìn)攻得分機(jī)會(huì)的能力不強(qiáng),但是籃下強(qiáng)攻次數(shù)明顯多于第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì),說(shuō)明第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)隊(duì)隊(duì)員發(fā)動(dòng)快攻更加謹(jǐn)慎,而第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)隊(duì)隊(duì)員對(duì)于快攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)的發(fā)動(dòng)更為頻繁。2.第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)隊(duì)搶攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)使用沒(méi)有第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)頻繁,但成功率較高,搶攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)得分比低于第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)。而第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)隊(duì)在運(yùn)用搶攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)時(shí)個(gè)人單打獨(dú)斗太多,內(nèi)線隊(duì)員參與搶攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)較多,但攻擊手段部以中遠(yuǎn)投籃為主,缺少籃下強(qiáng)打,外線隊(duì)員攻擊效率不高,從而導(dǎo)致?lián)尮?zhàn)術(shù)的得分效率低于第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)。3.從整體上來(lái)看中國(guó)隊(duì)在第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)的陣地進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)運(yùn)用的成功率要高于第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)。從個(gè)人進(jìn)攻戰(zhàn)術(shù)上來(lái)看,中國(guó)隊(duì)在第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的成功率要遠(yuǎn)高于第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì),第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)個(gè)人進(jìn)攻區(qū)域著重在籃下,而第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)的個(gè)人進(jìn)攻區(qū)域要分布于罰球線以下的籃筐左右兩側(cè)。從進(jìn)攻基礎(chǔ)配合上來(lái)看,中國(guó)隊(duì)在第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的使用次數(shù)要少于多于第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì),在第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上中國(guó)隊(duì)的傳切配合與突分配合發(fā)動(dòng)區(qū)域均分散于罰球線以上,而第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上中國(guó)隊(duì)的傳切配合與突分配合發(fā)動(dòng)區(qū)域多為禁區(qū)弧頂處。在全隊(duì)整體進(jìn)攻方面,中國(guó)隊(duì)在第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的運(yùn)用要多于第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)；在第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的中國(guó)隊(duì)陣地進(jìn)攻更加強(qiáng)調(diào)全隊(duì)的整體配合,而在第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上中國(guó)隊(duì)的攻擊節(jié)奏更快,更加注重局部進(jìn)攻基礎(chǔ)配合的運(yùn)用。在常用戰(zhàn)術(shù)方面,第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上的中國(guó)隊(duì)在發(fā)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)術(shù)時(shí)5號(hào)位隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻靠近籃下,而4號(hào)位隊(duì)員時(shí)常拉到高位伺機(jī)進(jìn)攻；而在第30屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)上中國(guó)隊(duì)在發(fā)動(dòng)戰(zhàn)術(shù)時(shí),5號(hào)位與4號(hào)位距離籃筐的位置都比較遠(yuǎn),1號(hào)位持球的時(shí)間較長(zhǎng)。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly adopts the methods of literature investigation and video observation, taking the attack tactical characteristics of the Chinese team in the 29th and 30th Olympic Games as the research objects. By comparing the offensive tactics of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games and the 30th Olympic Games, the author deeply discusses and ponders the offensive tactical characteristics of the Chinese team in the two Olympic Games, sums up and finds out the reasons for the decline of the Chinese team's competitive level. At the same time, according to the actual situation, the reference suggestions are given. By comparing the characteristics of offensive tactics in the two Olympic Games, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. In the 30th Olympic Games, the launching and receiving regions of the Chinese fast break tactics are more dispersed than those of the 29th Olympic Games. The way and route of propulsion are more concentrated than those of the 29th Olympic Games, and the number of people forming at the end of fast break is obviously less than that of the 29th Olympic Games, and the ability to create direct layup to form one-to-one attack scoring opportunities is not strong. However, the number of strong attacks under the basket is obviously higher than that of the 29th Olympic Games, indicating that the Chinese team members of the 29th Olympic Games are more cautious in launching the fast break. However, the Chinese team members of the 30th Olympic Games started the fast-break tactics more frequently .2. the 29 th Olympic team used the grabbing tactics less frequently than the 30th Olympic Games, but the success rate was relatively high. The score of the attack tactics was lower than that of the 30th Olympic Games. In the 30th Olympic Games, the Chinese team had too many individual soloists in the use of the strategy of preemptive attack, and the members of the inside line participated in more tactics of the preemptive attack, but the attack means department mainly took the shots of Cosco and lacked the strong play under the basket. The perimeter team is not efficient enough to attack. As a result, the scoring efficiency of the attack strategy is lower than that of the 29th Olympic Games. On the whole, the success rate of the position offensive tactics used by the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games is higher than that of the 30th Olympic Games. From the perspective of individual offensive tactics, The success rate of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games was much higher than that in the 30th Olympic Games, where the individual offensive areas of the 29th Olympic Games focused on the basket. The individual offensive areas of the 30th Olympic Games should be distributed on the left and right sides of the basket below the free throw line. From the point of view of the basic offensive cooperation, the Chinese team used fewer times in the 29th Olympic Games than in the 30th Olympic Games. At the 29th Olympic Games, the regions of the Chinese team's cross-cut cooperation and sudden scoring cooperation were scattered above the free throw line. In the 30th Olympic Games, most of the regions started by the Chinese team are the arc-top of the forbidden zone. In the whole attack of the whole team, the use of the Chinese team in the 29th Olympic Games is more than that in the 30th Olympic Games. In the 29th Olympic Games, the Chinese team put more emphasis on the overall cooperation of the whole team, while at the 30th Olympic Games, the Chinese team's attack rhythm was faster, and they paid more attention to the use of local offensive basic cooperation. In terms of common tactics, In the 29th Olympic Games, when the Chinese team launched tactics, the 5th member attacked near the basket, while the 4th member often pulled to the high position to wait for the attack; In the 30th Olympic Games, when the Chinese team started the tactics, position 5 and 4 were far away from the basket, and position 1 had a long time to hold the ball.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：G841

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳京生;許慧;;第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃防守技戰(zhàn)術(shù)研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

2 周武;毛偉民;;第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃與競(jìng)賽對(duì)手的技術(shù)統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)比較研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

3 姜明;王武年;;當(dāng)前世界高水平男子籃球運(yùn)動(dòng)防守技術(shù)特征研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

4 王衛(wèi)星;彭延春;;運(yùn)動(dòng)員體能與技戰(zhàn)術(shù)發(fā)揮的關(guān)系[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

5 錢利民;;對(duì)中國(guó)男籃目前存在問(wèn)題的分析研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年08期

6 范民運(yùn);趙志強(qiáng);趙強(qiáng)偉;;第29屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃進(jìn)攻能力的研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年11期

7 李學(xué)軍;王武年;易小堅(jiān);;當(dāng)前世界男子籃球強(qiáng)隊(duì)攻防特點(diǎn)研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年11期

8 王寶珠,楚繼軍;第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃比賽的分析和研究[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

9 陳明;黃建文;;第27~28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃若干技術(shù)指標(biāo)的比較與分析[J];廣州體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

10 胡安義;舒剛民;;對(duì)第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)男子籃球賽中國(guó)隊(duì)進(jìn)攻能力的分析[J];湖北體育科技;2006年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 江明世;中國(guó)男籃現(xiàn)狀及其對(duì)策的研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2004年

2 楊武;第28屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃與歐美強(qiáng)隊(duì)外線隊(duì)員無(wú)球?qū)沟谋容^研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2005年

3 李凱;中國(guó)男籃現(xiàn)狀分析及建議研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2007年

4 邱春輝;近兩屆奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)男籃對(duì)比分析研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1599851