本文關(guān)鍵詞： CBA 常規(guī)賽 國(guó)內(nèi)外 后衛(wèi) 技術(shù)水平　出處：《山東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著中國(guó)男子職業(yè)聯(lián)賽的不斷發(fā)展壯大,越來(lái)越多國(guó)外的優(yōu)秀后衛(wèi)來(lái)到CBA打球,這其中包括許多曾經(jīng)在美國(guó)職業(yè)聯(lián)賽效力的優(yōu)秀后衛(wèi),如北京的馬布里,遼寧的哈德森,山東的杰特等等,他們不僅擁有豐富的技戰(zhàn)術(shù)經(jīng)驗(yàn),出色的身體素質(zhì),還具有超強(qiáng)的比賽能力,他們的到來(lái)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)來(lái)說(shuō),既是機(jī)遇又是挑戰(zhàn),必將會(huì)對(duì)CBA聯(lián)賽中國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)成長(zhǎng)產(chǎn)生重要的影響。本文運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)資料、錄像與現(xiàn)場(chǎng)觀察、數(shù)理統(tǒng)計(jì)、邏輯分析、RSR綜合評(píng)價(jià)等研究方法,一方面對(duì)CBA常規(guī)賽國(guó)內(nèi)外后衛(wèi)的年齡、身高、體重和常規(guī)賽中各項(xiàng)技術(shù)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行定量分析研究,另一方面對(duì)CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)的訓(xùn)練方法和培養(yǎng)方式進(jìn)行有規(guī)律的定性研究,試圖找出CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)與國(guó)外后衛(wèi)在臨場(chǎng)比賽中的差距,并結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)自身實(shí)際情況,希望能為國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員的培養(yǎng)與訓(xùn)練提供一些適當(dāng)?shù)慕ㄗh與對(duì)策。選取了能夠體現(xiàn)攻防技術(shù)水平高低的量化指標(biāo),相關(guān)因素指標(biāo)(上場(chǎng)時(shí)間、年齡、身體形態(tài)),進(jìn)攻技術(shù)指標(biāo)(得分、投籃命中率、罰球命中率、助攻、失誤和進(jìn)攻籃板),防守技術(shù)指標(biāo)(搶斷、犯規(guī)、防守籃板、總籃板),通過(guò)對(duì)這些量化數(shù)據(jù)與資料的處理分析,得出結(jié)論。研究結(jié)果如下:(1)國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)的平均上場(chǎng)時(shí)間是33.69Min,國(guó)外后衛(wèi)的平均上場(chǎng)時(shí)間是38.50Min,通過(guò)獨(dú)立樣本T檢驗(yàn),雙尾檢驗(yàn)Sig.(雙側(cè))值為0.018,小于0.05,兩者存在顯著性差異。CBA常規(guī)賽國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)球員的上場(chǎng)時(shí)間較少,CBA國(guó)外后衛(wèi)球員的引進(jìn)限制了國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)球員的上場(chǎng)時(shí)間。(2)國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)的平均年齡是28.70歲,國(guó)外后衛(wèi)的平均年齡為29.00歲,通過(guò)獨(dú)立樣本T檢驗(yàn),雙尾檢驗(yàn)Sig.(雙側(cè))值為0.877大于0.05,兩者不存在顯著性差異,但國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)年齡浮動(dòng)比較大,新老交替緩慢。(3)國(guó)內(nèi)外后衛(wèi)在身高、體重、克托萊指數(shù)上均不存在顯著性差異,但CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)對(duì)力量素質(zhì)訓(xùn)練重視程度不夠,在高強(qiáng)度比賽中,爆發(fā)力不足,身體對(duì)抗能力較差。(4)國(guó)內(nèi)外后衛(wèi)在得分能力、三分球能力、二分球能力、罰球能力上均存在顯著性差異,CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)投籃技術(shù)選擇較少,投籃區(qū)域比較集中,投籃信心不足,心理素質(zhì)較差,突破造殺傷的能力比較弱。(5)國(guó)內(nèi)外后衛(wèi)在助攻、失誤上均不存在顯著性差異,但CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)的控球、支配球能力較差,遇到緊逼防守是容易出現(xiàn)失誤,在爭(zhēng)搶前場(chǎng)籃板球的能力上,兩者存在顯著性差異,CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)爭(zhēng)搶前場(chǎng)籃板球能力較差。(6)國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)在搶斷、犯規(guī)上都不存在顯著性差異,國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)球員對(duì)比賽閱讀能力、判斷能力、掌控比賽節(jié)奏的能力較差,反應(yīng)速度較慢,在防守籃板、總籃板的比較上,兩者存在顯著性差異,CBA國(guó)內(nèi)后衛(wèi)爭(zhēng)搶后場(chǎng)籃板的能力較差。
[Abstract]:With the development of the Chinese men's professional league, more and more foreign excellent defenders come to play in the CBA, including many excellent defenders who used to play in the American professional league, such as Marbury in Beijing. Liaoning Hudson, Shandong Jeter, and so on, they not only have rich technical and tactical experience, excellent physical quality, but also have a super ability to play, their arrival for the domestic defenders. Both opportunities and challenges will have an important impact on the growth of Chinese defenders in CBA leagues. This paper uses literature, video and field observation, mathematical statistics, logical analysis. RSR comprehensive evaluation and other research methods, on the one hand, the CBA regular season home and abroad guard age, height, weight and technical indicators in the regular season quantitative analysis. On the other hand, the training methods and training methods of domestic defenders in CBA are studied qualitatively in order to find out the gap between domestic and foreign defenders in the field. Combined with the actual situation of domestic defenders, the author hopes to provide some appropriate suggestions and countermeasures for the training and training of domestic defenders. The quantitative index which can reflect the level of offensive and defense technology is selected. Related factors (playing time, age, body shape, offensive technical indicators (scoring, shooting percentage, free throw hit rate, assists, errors and offensive rebounds, defensive technical indicators (steals, fouls). Defensive rebounds, total rebounds, through the analysis of these quantitative data and data processing, draw a conclusion. The results are as follows: 1) the average playing time of domestic defenders is 33.69 Min. The average playing time of foreign defenders is 38.50 Min.Through independent sample T test, the Sig (bilateral) value of double-tail test is 0.018, less than 0.05. There is a significant difference between the two. CBA regular season domestic defenders play less time. The introduction of CBA foreign defenders limits the playing time of domestic defenders.) the average age of domestic defenders is 28.70 years, and the average age of foreign defenders is 29.00 years. Through the independent sample T test, the Sig (bilateral) value of double-tail test was 0.877 > 0.05, there was no significant difference between the two, but the age of domestic defenders fluctuated greatly. There is no significant difference in height, weight and Ketole index between domestic and foreign guards, but CBA domestic defenders pay less attention to strength quality training, in high-intensity competition. There are significant differences in scoring ability, three-point ability, two-point ability and free-throw ability between domestic and foreign defenders. CBA domestic guard shooting technology choice is less, shooting area is relatively concentrated, shooting confidence is not enough, psychological quality is poor, breaking the ability to kill. 5) domestic and foreign defenders in assists. There is no significant difference in errors, but the ability of CBA domestic defenders to control the ball is poor, it is easy to make mistakes in tight defense, and there is a significant difference between them in the ability of fighting for rebounds in the front court. CBA domestic defenders scramble for the front-court rebounding ability. 6) domestic defenders in the steals, fouls are not significant differences, domestic defenders of the ability to read the game, judgment ability. The ability to control the rhythm of the game is poor and the reaction speed is slow. There are significant differences between the defensive rebounds and the total rebounds.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王潤(rùn)生,張冉;談籃球核心后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員的培養(yǎng)[J];湖北體育科技;2001年01期

2 付雷,李建龍;談優(yōu)秀冰球后衛(wèi)應(yīng)具備的條件[J];哈爾濱體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

3 王小平;;我國(guó)核心后衛(wèi)存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)青少年訓(xùn)練的啟示[J];體育科學(xué)研究;2006年03期

4 趙文勝;;籃球核心后衛(wèi)相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[J];鄭州鐵路職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期

5 凌柳雄;;試論籃球后衛(wèi)的培養(yǎng)和訓(xùn)練[J];廣西工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年S1期

6 郭彩琴;;籃球后衛(wèi)應(yīng)具備的能力及影響因素[J];百色學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

7 黃荔生;;淺談籃球后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員應(yīng)具備的能力與培養(yǎng)方法[J];莆田學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

8 梁亮;;淺談籃球核心后衛(wèi)的培養(yǎng)[J];科學(xué)大眾(科學(xué)教育);2010年05期

9 劉彬;;關(guān)于我國(guó)籃球后衛(wèi)的探討[J];南昌教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

10 李文龍;李權(quán);;籃球后衛(wèi)的作用與素質(zhì)分析[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(中旬刊);2013年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條

1 斯力格;李強(qiáng);劉丹;;國(guó)際高水平足球賽后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員跑動(dòng)能力研究[A];第九屆全國(guó)體育科學(xué)大會(huì)論文摘要匯編(3)[C];2011年

2 朱青;張宏杰;;第15屆男籃世錦賽中外后衛(wèi)隊(duì)員進(jìn)攻能力的比較研究[A];第八屆全國(guó)體育科學(xué)大會(huì)論文摘要匯編（一）[C];2007年

3 張t，

本文編號(hào)：1476472