【摘要】：中央城鎮(zhèn)化會(huì)議強(qiáng)調(diào):“要保留村莊原始風(fēng)貌,更要保護(hù)和弘揚(yáng)傳統(tǒng)優(yōu)秀文化”。2017年中央1號(hào)文件:“支持傳統(tǒng)村落保護(hù),有條件的地區(qū)實(shí)行連片保護(hù)和適度開發(fā)”。但就目前傳統(tǒng)村落保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀來看,規(guī)劃與設(shè)計(jì)內(nèi)容輕文重物、管理與建設(shè)照搬城鎮(zhèn)做法等加劇了傳統(tǒng)村落文脈的斷裂,造成了地域特色的危機(jī)。本文研究的深澳村,地處浙江桐廬縣富春江畔,村內(nèi)現(xiàn)保留約140幢明清時(shí)期傳統(tǒng)建筑和60多幢民國(guó)時(shí)期建筑,先后于2006年、2007年列入省級(jí)、國(guó)家級(jí)歷史文化名村名錄,是浙江西部地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)村落的典型代表,極具理論研究?jī)r(jià)值。全文是針對(duì)深澳村傳統(tǒng)民居建筑空間形態(tài)的基礎(chǔ)性研究,共分六章:第一章首先確定研究對(duì)象,梳理分析國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,明確研究?jī)?nèi)容、目的及意義;第二章從傳統(tǒng)民居建筑生成土壤和歷史變遷著手,探尋自然環(huán)境、社會(huì)形態(tài)、世俗文化等因素與空間形態(tài)之間的聯(lián)系;第三、第四章分別從宏觀的整體空間形態(tài)布局、微觀的局部典型空間形態(tài)(入口空間、天井空間、廳堂空間)著手,結(jié)合實(shí)地?cái)?shù)據(jù)的調(diào)研、案例的分類,深入剖析深澳村傳統(tǒng)民居建筑的空間形態(tài),揭示其空間形態(tài)種類、形態(tài)特征、內(nèi)在組織及其演變規(guī)律和局部空間作用等;第五章基于整體和局部空間形態(tài)的研究,分別以美學(xué)范疇的形式美和意境美的角度探索深澳村傳統(tǒng)民居建筑空間形態(tài)的審美表現(xiàn)、審美價(jià)值;最后第六章對(duì)全文進(jìn)行總結(jié),從而完成對(duì)深澳村傳統(tǒng)民居建筑空間形態(tài)的分層次多角度解析,進(jìn)而形成對(duì)其空間形態(tài)的整體認(rèn)知。通過以上聚焦于傳統(tǒng)民居建筑空間形態(tài)的研究,期望能為后續(xù)的理論研究者、規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)師、政府管理者,提供具有一定理論價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義的基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)和信息素材。
[Abstract]:The Central urbanization Conference stressed: "We should preserve the original style of the village, and more importantly protect and carry forward the excellent traditional culture." the 2017 Central Committee document No. 1: "support for the protection of traditional villages, the implementation of continuous protection and appropriate development in areas with conditions." However, in view of the present situation of traditional village protection, planning and design contents are light and heavy, management and construction copy town practices, etc., which aggravate the breakage of traditional village context and cause the crisis of regional characteristics. This article studies the deep Australia village, is located in the Zhejiang Tonglu County Fuchun River bank, the village now retains approximately 140 Ming and Qing dynasties period traditional buildings and more than 60 Republic of China period buildings, successively in 2006, 2007 listed the provincial level, the national historical culture name village list, It is a typical representative of the traditional villages in the western part of Zhejiang Province, and is of great theoretical value. This paper is aimed at the basic research on the spatial form of traditional residential buildings in Shen-ao Village, which is divided into six chapters: the first chapter determines the research object, combs and analyzes the current research situation at home and abroad, and clarifies the content, purpose and significance of the research; The second chapter starts with the formation soil and historical changes of traditional residential buildings, and explores the relationship between natural environment, social form, secular culture and space form. Third, the fourth chapter starts from the macroscopic overall spatial form layout, the microscopic local typical spatial form (entrance space, the courtyard space, the hall space), unifies the field data investigation, the case classification, Deeply analyze the spatial form of the traditional residential buildings in Shen-ao Village, and reveal its spatial form types, morphological characteristics, internal organization and its evolution law and local spatial function, etc. The fifth chapter is based on the study of the whole and the local space form, and explores the aesthetic expression and aesthetic value of the space form of the traditional residential buildings in Shen-ao Village from the angle of the formal beauty and the artistic conception beauty of the aesthetic category. Finally, the sixth chapter summarizes the full text, so as to complete the Shen-ao Village traditional residential building spatial form of multi-level analysis, and then form the overall understanding of its spatial form. By focusing on the spatial form of traditional residential buildings, the author hopes to provide theoretical and practical data and information materials for the following theoretical researchers, planning designers, government administrators.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TU241.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丁繼軍;王依涵;申麗娟;;要素·結(jié)構(gòu)·類型:歷史文化村落肌理解讀[J];藝術(shù)與設(shè)計(jì)(理論);2015年06期

2 翟輝;王麗紅;;“時(shí)空連續(xù)統(tǒng)”視野下的鄉(xiāng)土建筑研究思考[J];南方建筑;2013年06期

3 王金平;郭朝輝;;山西民居入口空間界面形式解析[J];山西建筑;2010年14期

4 ;以發(fā)展的眼光看待傳統(tǒng)民居的保護(hù)與改造——訪清華大學(xué)建筑學(xué)院教授 單德啟[J];設(shè)計(jì)家;2009年06期

5 李世芬;張婧;;建筑群與外部空間有機(jī)構(gòu)成的方法解析 以大連市中山廣場(chǎng)為例[J];時(shí)代建筑;2008年06期

6 張紅巖;;第四屆中國(guó)古村落保護(hù)與發(fā)展研討會(huì)在上海召開 中國(guó)景觀村落第二屆評(píng)選活動(dòng)即將啟動(dòng)[J];今日國(guó)土;2008年10期

7 徐洪;;淮安市中心商業(yè)區(qū)空間發(fā)展模式探討[J];山西建筑;2007年07期

8 ;第三屆中國(guó)古村落保護(hù)發(fā)展國(guó)際研討會(huì)在江西婺源隆重召開[J];今日國(guó)土;2006年Z4期

9 程李英;;家法族規(guī)在明清法律體系中的地位[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

10 何禮平,應(yīng)四愛,張葉田;模糊性思維的建筑創(chuàng)作意義[J];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 ;如何保護(hù)搶救古村落建筑[N];文匯報(bào);2008年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王莉莉;云南民族聚落空間解析[D];武漢大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 洪霞;晉中傳統(tǒng)民居宅門研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2016年

2 張海鷗;河南商丘古城傳統(tǒng)民居研究[D];南京工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 朱琳;以淺空間理論分析中國(guó)園林并應(yīng)用于鳳河會(huì)所6號(hào)院設(shè)計(jì)[D];清華大學(xué);2014年

4 彭建波;江西傳統(tǒng)民居天井的環(huán)境營(yíng)造研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年

5 劉遠(yuǎn)峰;麗江大研古鎮(zhèn)街巷空間審美研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2011年

6 陳冬苗;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)建筑入口研究[D];東南大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2426903