【摘要】：傳統(tǒng)村落是我們祖先經(jīng)過長(zhǎng)期積淀創(chuàng)造出的歷史文化遺產(chǎn),它不僅為人們提供了居住生活場(chǎng)所,還涵蓋了村莊的傳統(tǒng)文化與民俗文化,包括獨(dú)特的建筑風(fēng)貌、豐富的歷史、深厚的文化積淀等。特別是一些歷史名村,具有較高的美學(xué)、文化和精神價(jià)值。近年來,國家為了改善鄉(xiāng)村居住環(huán)境,倡導(dǎo)建設(shè)社會(huì)主義新農(nóng)村。但一些地區(qū)出現(xiàn)了“拆舊造新”的碎片化建設(shè),盲目的使用新材料、新工藝,導(dǎo)致了傳統(tǒng)民風(fēng)民俗、生活方式和鄉(xiāng)土風(fēng)貌在一定程度上受到破壞。因此,傳統(tǒng)村落建筑環(huán)境繼承與發(fā)展的關(guān)系成為值得探討的問題。魯中地區(qū)明清古村落的典型代表是章丘市楊官村,其選址布局與建筑特色蘊(yùn)含豐富的哲學(xué)思想,而且村莊依山而建,院落層疊起伏,目前依然保持著較為完整的建筑風(fēng)貌與村落格局,蘊(yùn)含豐富的歷史文化信息與鄉(xiāng)土文化內(nèi)涵,入選為山東省級(jí)傳統(tǒng)村落。整座村莊布局靈活,當(dāng)漫步在古樸平滑的板石路上,徜徉于層巒疊嶂的青山中,在綠水環(huán)繞的映襯下使人感到與天地融合。但是無序的建設(shè)活動(dòng)使村莊的風(fēng)貌遭受破壞,最終因年久失修而倒塌,如果不能及時(shí)采取合理的保護(hù)措施,古村落將難以維持下去。文章以楊官村的保護(hù)與發(fā)展為例,通過實(shí)地考察、測(cè)繪調(diào)研,采用文獻(xiàn)資料法、綜合分析法等對(duì)村莊資源進(jìn)行分析,并編寫傳統(tǒng)文化保護(hù)名錄。首先,論述了研究背景及選題,結(jié)合村莊的特點(diǎn)、國內(nèi)外的研究與實(shí)踐,總結(jié)村莊存在的問題,以便針對(duì)性的采取合理有效的保護(hù)措施;其次,挖掘楊官村歷史人文價(jià)值與地域特色,對(duì)楊官村的地貌特征、村落選址、村落格局、建筑形式和施工工藝與方法等進(jìn)行分析,分析改造的可行性和必要性;最后,著眼于楊官村未來的發(fā)展,提出村莊的保護(hù)與利用原則,探討一種以村民為核心的建筑環(huán)境保護(hù)機(jī)制對(duì)楊官村提出保護(hù)和再利用設(shè)計(jì),將古村落有價(jià)值的風(fēng)貌與地域特色進(jìn)行保留的同時(shí),延續(xù)古村落生命力。
[Abstract]:The traditional village is the historical and cultural heritage created by our ancestors after a long period of accumulation. It not only provides people with a living place, but also covers the traditional culture and folk culture of the village, including its unique architectural style and rich history. Profound cultural accumulation, etc. In particular, some historic villages have higher aesthetic, cultural and spiritual values. In recent years, the country in order to improve the rural living environment, advocate the construction of new socialist countryside. However, in some areas, the fragmented construction of "demolishing old and building new", the blind use of new materials and new techniques have led to the destruction of traditional folk customs, lifestyles and local features to a certain extent. Therefore, the relationship between the inheritance and development of traditional village architecture environment is worth discussing. The typical representative of the ancient villages in the Ming and Qing dynasties in the central Shandong region is Yangguan Village in Zhangqiu City. Its location, layout and architectural features contain rich philosophical ideas, and the villages are built according to the mountains, and the courtyard is stacked with ups and downs. At present, it still maintains a relatively complete architectural style and village pattern, contains rich historical and cultural information and local cultural connotation, and is selected as a traditional village at the provincial level in Shandong Province. The village has a flexible layout, as it strolls along the ancient, smooth stone road, roaming through the mountains of mountains and making people feel United against the background of the green waters. But the disorderly construction activities destroyed the style and appearance of the village and finally collapsed because of years of disrepair. If reasonable protection measures are not taken in time the ancient villages will be difficult to maintain. Taking the protection and development of Yangguancun as an example, this paper analyzes the village resources by field investigation, surveying and mapping, using the method of literature and comprehensive analysis, and compiles the list of traditional culture protection. First of all, it discusses the research background and topics, combined with the characteristics of the village, research and practice at home and abroad, summed up the problems existing in the village, in order to take reasonable and effective protection measures; secondly, Excavating the historical and humanistic value and regional characteristics of Yangguan Village, analyzing the landform feature, village location, village pattern, architectural form, construction technology and method of Yangguan Village, and analyzing the feasibility and necessity of the transformation. In view of the future development of Yangguan Village, this paper puts forward the principles of protection and utilization of the village, and probes into the design of protection and reuse of Yangguan Village by a kind of building environmental protection mechanism with villagers as the core. While preserving the valuable features and regional features of the ancient villages, the vitality of the ancient villages will be continued.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東建筑大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：TU982.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 竇炎;;洛陽地區(qū)“明錮窯”的生態(tài)經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];藝術(shù)評(píng)論;2014年12期

2 蔡立東;楊曄;劉國棟;;歷史建筑保護(hù)的物權(quán)法進(jìn)路[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年03期

3 陳晟;;中國歷史文化名城的保護(hù)與發(fā)展[J];山西建筑;2013年32期

4 謝祥富;孫志華;;村落空間形態(tài)和居住特點(diǎn)探析[J];山西建筑;2013年31期

5 靳亦冰;王軍;;陜北旱作農(nóng)業(yè)區(qū)傳統(tǒng)村落發(fā)展模式與民居營建研究[J];建筑與文化;2011年08期

6 薛林平;陳海霞;夏渤洋;;官溝古村的民居建筑研究[J];華中建筑;2011年08期

7 金程宏;王欣;樂振華;;風(fēng)水對(duì)傳統(tǒng)村鎮(zhèn)空間營造的影響[J];北方園藝;2011年14期

8 汪如鋼;;鄉(xiāng)土重建及其生活的延續(xù)——朱山傳統(tǒng)村落整體性保護(hù)設(shè)計(jì)[J];華中建筑;2011年03期

9 林曉蓉;劉淑虎;;三溪村空間形態(tài)研究及思考[J];華中建筑;2011年01期

10 武啟祥;韓林飛;朱連奇;陳方杰;;江西婺源古村落空間布局探析[J];規(guī)劃師;2010年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 辛同升;魯中地區(qū)近代歷史建筑修復(fù)與再利用研究[D];天津大學(xué);2008年

2 沈茂英;中國山區(qū)聚落持續(xù)發(fā)展與管理研究[D];中國科學(xué)院研究生院（成都山地災(zāi)害與環(huán)境研究所）;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 孫妍;河北井陘縣于家古村落鄉(xiāng)土景觀研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

2 齊鵬鵬;濟(jì)南朱家峪古村落民居建造技術(shù)與保護(hù)利用研究[D];山東建筑大學(xué);2011年

3 朱灶芳;婺源游山古村落保護(hù)與發(fā)展研究[D];北方工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

4 孫夏;濟(jì)南朱家峪古村落聚落空間形態(tài)研究[D];山東建筑大學(xué);2011年

5 張曉謙;傳統(tǒng)民居院落空間的再演繹[D];廈門大學(xué);2007年

6 趙志芳;歷史文化村落的保護(hù)與利用[D];太原理工大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2187357