本文選題：鄉(xiāng)土建筑 + 空間文化符號(hào)�。� 參考：《長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著工業(yè)社會(huì)的到來(lái),我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅猛發(fā)展,匯集了人類(lèi)上千年智慧結(jié)晶的鄉(xiāng)土建筑,在現(xiàn)代文明的潛移默化中漸漸失去了它的光芒,質(zhì)樸、適用的鄉(xiāng)土建筑使人們感到乏味和落伍,近年來(lái)大量具有歷史價(jià)值的鄉(xiāng)土建筑被破壞,中西結(jié)合的洋樓,漫無(wú)章法的建設(shè),使新農(nóng)村的風(fēng)貌平庸無(wú)趣,失去了文化的多樣性。朝鮮族歷史文化悠久,傳統(tǒng)建筑個(gè)性鮮明,極具民族特色,但近年來(lái)外出打工的人越來(lái)越多,空心村現(xiàn)象嚴(yán)重,住宅長(zhǎng)期閑置年久失修,還有一些開(kāi)發(fā)地區(qū)的村民受到經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的驅(qū)使而大力發(fā)展以高額商業(yè)回報(bào)為主的產(chǎn)業(yè),使得原有傳統(tǒng)特色的生產(chǎn)方式逐漸消失。想要改變上述現(xiàn)象,更好地建設(shè)新農(nóng)村,保護(hù)與再利用朝鮮族鄉(xiāng)土建筑至關(guān)重要!論文以文化學(xué)原理為理論基礎(chǔ)、符號(hào)學(xué)為切入點(diǎn),對(duì)我省朝鮮族鄉(xiāng)土建筑空間文化符號(hào)進(jìn)行提煉與研究。在研究方法上,采用田野調(diào)查和文獻(xiàn)研究的方法,多角度的分析我省朝鮮族鄉(xiāng)土建筑空間文化符號(hào)的發(fā)生和發(fā)展。論文主要分六個(gè)章節(jié):緒論、吉林鄉(xiāng)土建筑中的“空間”、吉林朝鮮族鄉(xiāng)土建筑空間文化符號(hào)及其功能、多民族文化融合下的吉林朝鮮族鄉(xiāng)土建筑空間、吉林鄉(xiāng)土建筑空間文化保護(hù)及再利用、結(jié)論。結(jié)論是吉林地區(qū)的朝鮮族受自然、文化背景影響,具有明顯的地域及民族特色。朝鮮族民居不追求外表雄偉壯觀,而是注重內(nèi)在的舒適和典雅,以及與自然的融合,建筑具有強(qiáng)烈的樸素性、自然性特點(diǎn)。由于長(zhǎng)期與漢族、滿族、蒙古族生活在一起,傳統(tǒng)建筑受這些民族的影響,個(gè)別形式上有所改變但整體上很好地保留了本民族的建筑特色。在保護(hù)鄉(xiāng)土建筑的同時(shí)還要注重對(duì)其的傳承與發(fā)展。對(duì)空間的理念進(jìn)行創(chuàng)新,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)形式和技術(shù)進(jìn)行革新,從根本上解決農(nóng)民住宅現(xiàn)有的問(wèn)題,提高農(nóng)民的生活質(zhì)量、促進(jìn)新農(nóng)村建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:With the arrival of industrial society, the rapid development of our economy, the collection of thousands of years of human wisdom crystallization of the local architecture, in the modern civilization gradually lost its light, simple, The applicable local architecture makes people feel dull and outdated. In recent years, a large number of local buildings with historical value have been destroyed. The foreign buildings combined with China and the West, the construction without rules and regulations, make the style of the new countryside uninteresting and lose the cultural diversity. The Korean nationality has a long history and culture, the traditional architecture has a distinct personality, and it has a national characteristic. However, in recent years, more and more people have gone out to work, the phenomenon of hollow villages is serious, and the houses have been idle for a long time and have been in disrepair. Some villagers in some development areas are driven by economic interests to develop industries with high commercial returns, which makes the traditional production mode gradually disappear. To change the above phenomenon, better construction of a new countryside, the protection and reuse of the Korean native buildings is very important! Based on the theory of culturology and semiotics as the breakthrough point, this paper refines and studies the cultural symbols of the local architectural space of the Korean nationality in our province. In terms of research methods, field investigation and literature research are adopted to analyze the occurrence and development of the cultural symbols of the local architectural space of Korean nationality in our province from various angles. The paper is divided into six chapters: introduction, "space" in Jilin native architecture, cultural symbol and its function of Jilin Korean native architecture, and Jilin Korean native architectural space under the integration of multi-national culture. Jilin native architecture space culture protection and reuse, conclusion. The conclusion is that the Korean nationality in Jilin region is influenced by natural and cultural background and has obvious regional and national characteristics. Korean folk houses do not pursue grand appearance, but pay attention to the inherent comfort and elegance, as well as the integration with nature, the architecture has a strong simplicity, natural characteristics. Because of living with Han, Manchu and Mongolians for a long time, the traditional architecture is influenced by these ethnic groups, and some forms have been changed, but the architectural characteristics of this nation have been well preserved as a whole. While protecting local architecture, we should pay attention to its inheritance and development. The idea of space is innovated, the traditional form and technology are innovated, the existing problems of peasant residence are solved fundamentally, the quality of life of farmers is improved, and the construction of new countryside is promoted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)春工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TU-05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金日學(xué);周奧博;;基于新農(nóng)村背景下朝鮮族民居可持續(xù)設(shè)計(jì)策略研究[J];城市住宅;2016年02期

2 樊澤怡;;從符號(hào)學(xué)的角度探討中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)土建筑[J];現(xiàn)代裝飾(理論);2016年02期

3 閆竹玲;孫冉;;我國(guó)鄉(xiāng)土建筑存在的問(wèn)題與解決對(duì)策[J];低溫建筑技術(shù);2014年09期

4 李me;;融合與生成——巴巴寺磚雕圖案紋飾的文化解讀[J];民族藝林;2014年01期

5 梅雅莉;;淺析鄉(xiāng)土建筑與當(dāng)代鄉(xiāng)土性建筑設(shè)計(jì)[J];林業(yè)科技情報(bào);2014年01期

6 閆玉鑫;;淺析外墻保溫技術(shù)[J];中國(guó)新技術(shù)新產(chǎn)品;2012年04期

7 謝祥剛;;試論朝鮮族婚姻家庭中倫理思想和道德觀念[J];學(xué)理論;2011年33期

8 劉暢;;韓國(guó)“興文化”:戲謔式幽默[J];書(shū)屋;2011年10期

9 陳志華;;中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)土建筑之現(xiàn)狀——陳志華教授訪談錄[J];中國(guó)名城;2010年04期

10 朱睿;朝鮮民族的薩滿教文化[J];民族文學(xué)研究;1995年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 金正鎬;東北地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)民居與居住文化研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 周子霽;吉林省東部山區(qū)鄉(xiāng)土文化景觀營(yíng)建與保護(hù)研究[D];吉林建筑大學(xué);2015年

2 吳龍峰;延邊朝鮮族聚居地鄉(xiāng)土景觀研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 王飛;鄉(xiāng)土建筑遺產(chǎn)保護(hù)實(shí)踐的梳理研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2013年

4 桂濤;鄉(xiāng)土建筑價(jià)值及其評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2013年

5 王曉莉;吉林省朝鮮族地區(qū)鄉(xiāng)土建筑景觀研究[D];吉林建筑工程學(xué)院;2012年

6 陳崇賢;鄉(xiāng)土文化在鄉(xiāng)村景觀規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)中的保護(hù)與傳承[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

7 董瑋番;吉林省鄉(xiāng)土生活與鄉(xiāng)土居住形態(tài)研究[D];吉林建筑工程學(xué)院;2010年

8 任洪國(guó);東北地區(qū)村鎮(zhèn)住宅火炕技術(shù)設(shè)計(jì)研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

9 盧迪;東北滿族民居的文化涵化研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

10 楊躍華;建筑狹縫空間研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1927701