本文選題：古城 + 紳士化　； 參考：《蘇州科技大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：基于“紳士化”視角,審視蘇州古城傳統(tǒng)街區(qū)的發(fā)展,認為紳士化雖提升了古城傳統(tǒng)街區(qū)的物質空間環(huán)境,但也帶來日益嚴峻的社會-空間結構失衡問題,主要包括社會結構分異化、居住空間碎片化和公共服務失衡化。造成該現(xiàn)象的主要原因是,在土地稀缺、房價日益趨高和古城建筑高度限制等政策限制的多重壓力之下,古城住房市場發(fā)展、產業(yè)升級轉型、社會網(wǎng)絡與傳統(tǒng)文化維系陷入困境:(1)普通商品房開發(fā)停滯、別墅項目成為趨勢,門禁社區(qū)排他性現(xiàn)象及社會網(wǎng)絡的破壞現(xiàn)象嚴重;(2)別墅項目的開發(fā)與銷售舉步維艱,碎片化、“孤立化”的“高端住區(qū)”與周邊環(huán)境格格不入,市場吸引力下降,存量住房出現(xiàn)空置;(3)舊街坊住區(qū)產權關系復雜、改造路徑單一,“淪陷”為弱勢群體的聚居地,中等收入水平以下人群占古城區(qū)常住人口的80%,加劇社會結構的兩極化,嚴重破壞歷史街區(qū)的物質空間環(huán)境;(4)旅游業(yè)的快速發(fā)酵,催生一批以面向游客為主的商業(yè)街“高檔化”改造,忽視本地居民需求和傳統(tǒng)價值觀念,對古城特色旅游品牌造成威脅。鑒于古城傳統(tǒng)街區(qū)的紳士化發(fā)展趨勢不可避免,分析紳士化的動力機制和內在機理,提出促進各階層共生的應對策略:如建立合理的住區(qū)功能結構,構建以公共空間為橋梁的混合居住模式、通過調整社會公共資源,強化以“中間階層”為媒介的文化交流、以優(yōu)化協(xié)作治理平臺為路徑,突顯以居民自組織和多元合作為特色的市場運機制,為古城傳統(tǒng)街區(qū)的社會-空間雙向優(yōu)化尋覓新的思路和方法,彰顯古城地域特色。
[Abstract]:Based on the view of "Gentleness", this paper examines the development of the traditional block of Suzhou ancient city, and thinks that the gentrification has promoted the material space environment of the traditional district of the ancient city, but it has also brought about the increasingly serious problem of the imbalance of social-spatial structure. It mainly includes the alienation of social structure, fragmentation of living space and imbalance of public services. The main reasons for this phenomenon are the development of the housing market and the upgrading of industries in ancient cities under the pressure of policy constraints, such as the scarcity of land, the increasing rise in house prices and the high restrictions on the construction of ancient cities. Social network and traditional culture maintain into a dilemma: 1) the development of ordinary commercial housing stagnates, the villa project becomes a trend, and the phenomenon of exclusion of the access control community and the destruction of the social network are serious. 2) the development and sale of the villa project is difficult and fragmented. The "isolated" high-end residential area "is incompatible with the surrounding environment, and the market attractiveness is declining, and the stock housing becomes vacant. The property right relationship of the old neighborhood residential area is complex, the transformation path is single, and the" enemy-occupied "residential area is the settlement of the disadvantaged group. The population below the middle income level accounts for 80% of the resident population in the ancient urban areas, exacerbating the polarization of the social structure and seriously damaging the material space environment of the historical blocks. A group of "high grade" transformation of the shopping street, which is oriented to tourists, has been accelerated, ignoring the needs of local residents and traditional values, and threatening the tourism brands with the characteristics of the ancient city. In view of the inevitable development trend of gentrification in the traditional districts of ancient cities, the dynamic mechanism and internal mechanism of gentrification are analyzed, and the countermeasures to promote the symbiosis of all strata are put forward, such as the establishment of a reasonable functional structure of residential areas, By adjusting the social public resources, strengthening the cultural exchange with the "middle class" as the medium, and optimizing the cooperative governance platform as the path, we should build a mixed housing model with public space as the bridge. The market transportation mechanism, which is characterized by residents' self-organization and multi-cooperation, is highlighted to find new ideas and methods for the social and spatial optimization of the traditional neighborhoods of the ancient city, and to highlight the regional characteristics of the ancient cities.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：TU984.114

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王臣昊;;蘇州古城“去工業(yè)”問題思考[J];蘇州科技學院學報(社會科學版);2016年06期

2 周永博;程德年;胡昕;魏向東;;生活方式型旅游目的地品牌個性建構——基于蘇州古城案例的混合方法研究[J];旅游學刊;2016年07期

3 楊夢麗;王勇;;歷史街區(qū)保護更新的協(xié)作機制[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2016年06期

4 夏杰長;齊飛;;國外人口結構與旅游發(fā)展研究進展及啟示[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2016年02期

5 李甜;宋彥;黃一如;;美國混合住區(qū)發(fā)展建設模式研究及其啟示[J];國際城市規(guī)劃;2015年05期

6 謝滌湘;常江;;我國城市更新中的紳士化研究述評[J];規(guī)劃師;2015年09期

7 陳培陽;;中國城市學區(qū)紳士化及其社會空間效應[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2015年08期

8 宋煜;;社區(qū)治理視角下的智慧社區(qū)的理論與實踐研究[J];電子政務;2015年06期

9 夏健;王勇;楊晟;;基于城市特色的蘇州工業(yè)遺產保護框架與再利用模式[J];規(guī)劃師;2015年04期

10 廖文莉;;城市規(guī)劃與新型城鎮(zhèn)化共生機制研究[J];現(xiàn)代商貿工業(yè);2015年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 袁泉;蘇州歷史街區(qū)內建筑保護與更新研究[D];上海交通大學;2009年

2 馬海東;近20年來蘇州古城傳統(tǒng)街區(qū)保護與更新的研究[D];清華大學;2003年

，

本文編號：1827209