【摘要】：紀(jì)昀晚年創(chuàng)作的《閱微草堂筆記》,形式短小,內(nèi)容博雜,是集志怪、軼事、考證于一體的筆記小說(shuō)。紀(jì)昀一生潛力于學(xué)術(shù)研究,在創(chuàng)作《閱微草堂筆記》時(shí)紀(jì)昀將理性的學(xué)術(shù)思維與學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)注入到文學(xué)創(chuàng)作中,使小說(shuō)呈現(xiàn)出“著書(shū)者之筆”的學(xué)術(shù)特色。本文以《閱微草堂筆記》為研究對(duì)象,采用作品分析法、統(tǒng)計(jì)法等研究方法,以紀(jì)昀的學(xué)術(shù)思維與《閱微草堂筆記》的藝術(shù)風(fēng)格為線索,以《閱微草堂筆記》的內(nèi)容、藝術(shù)為研究?jī)?nèi)容,分析紀(jì)昀與學(xué)術(shù)的關(guān)系,《閱微草堂筆記》的創(chuàng)作理念、創(chuàng)作旨趣、美學(xué)風(fēng)格,以此來(lái)探究紀(jì)昀的學(xué)術(shù)思維對(duì)小說(shuō)創(chuàng)作的影響。論文由以下四部分組成:第一部分是對(duì)紀(jì)昀學(xué)人身份的認(rèn)定。本章從紀(jì)昀學(xué)人角色的歷時(shí)演變、譜系的多重建構(gòu)、時(shí)代因緣等三方面分析紀(jì)昀與學(xué)術(shù)的關(guān)系。紀(jì)昀一生致力于學(xué)術(shù)的考證研究,形成了自成體系的學(xué)術(shù)思維,是乾嘉學(xué)派中不可替代的重要角色。紀(jì)昀是在乾嘉學(xué)派的影響下,將自己的學(xué)術(shù)思維、學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)融入到小說(shuō)創(chuàng)作中的。第二部分論述了紀(jì)昀“著書(shū)者之筆”的創(chuàng)作理念。作為崇尚嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)?shù)那螌W(xué)者,紀(jì)昀提倡不同于“才子之筆”的“著書(shū)者之筆”。這一部分首先詳細(xì)論述了學(xué)人思維影響下紀(jì)昀恪守傳統(tǒng)的文體觀念。紀(jì)昀在傳統(tǒng)目錄學(xué)的立場(chǎng)上,將雜說(shuō)與筆記相融合,形成了“寓勸戒、資考證、廣見(jiàn)聞”的筆記小說(shuō)。其次,論述了理性的創(chuàng)作思維。歷史家的“實(shí)錄”精神和樸學(xué)家的“實(shí)事求是”精神對(duì)《閱微草堂筆記》的創(chuàng)作形成了辯證與求實(shí)黜虛的敘事規(guī)范。最后,論述了紀(jì)昀通過(guò)神道設(shè)教的外在形式凸顯明道的宗旨。第三部分論述了學(xué)人紀(jì)昀通過(guò)《閱微草堂筆記》創(chuàng)作,將小說(shuō)引向了學(xué)術(shù)化、學(xué)問(wèn)化、知識(shí)化的道路。本篇通過(guò)探討《閱微草堂筆記》中儒釋道之爭(zhēng)、漢宋之爭(zhēng)等學(xué)術(shù)爭(zhēng)鳴的現(xiàn)象;《閱微草堂筆記》中的考證內(nèi)容與考證特點(diǎn);紀(jì)昀知識(shí)才學(xué)的展示等,進(jìn)一步論述了紀(jì)昀有意將學(xué)人情懷融入到小說(shuō)創(chuàng)作之中。第四部分論述了學(xué)人紀(jì)昀展現(xiàn)的《閱微草堂筆記》的美學(xué)風(fēng)格。本篇主要結(jié)合作品分析在學(xué)者崇尚理性思維的影響下,紀(jì)昀反對(duì)縟麗、虛構(gòu)的文學(xué)風(fēng)格及對(duì)小說(shuō)的創(chuàng)作進(jìn)行了藝術(shù)處理。紀(jì)昀通過(guò)事理交融、喜好議論等方法使《閱微草堂筆記》呈現(xiàn)出以理主情的構(gòu)思模式;通過(guò)好讀書(shū)、好議論、好知禮的鬼狐塑造了一大批讀書(shū)明禮的博雅鬼狐形象;通過(guò)樸素簡(jiǎn)練的白描手法、簡(jiǎn)淡妙遠(yuǎn)的語(yǔ)言技巧構(gòu)成了尚質(zhì)黜華的美學(xué)風(fēng)格。通過(guò)對(duì)小說(shuō)中美學(xué)風(fēng)格的分析,進(jìn)一步確定《閱微草堂筆記》的藝術(shù)地位。
[Abstract]:In his later years, Ji Yun's notes on reading micro-Caotang are short in form and rich in content. They are a collection of strange stories, anecdotes, and textual research in one of the note-taking novels. Ji Yun's life potential lies in academic research. Shi Jiyun infused rational academic thinking and academic viewpoint into literary creation in the creation of "Reading the Notes of Wei Cao Tang", which makes the novel show the academic characteristics of "the writer's pen". In this paper, the author takes "Reading the notes of the micro-caotang" as the research object, adopts the methods of work analysis and statistics, takes Ji Yun's academic thinking and the artistic style of "reading the notes of the micro-caotang" as the clue, and takes the contents of "reading the notes of the micro-caotang" as the clue. Art is the research content, the relationship between Ji Yun and the academic is analyzed, and the creative idea, the creative purport and the aesthetic style of "Reading Wei Cao Tang Notes" are analyzed to explore the influence of Ji Yun's academic thinking on the novel creation. The thesis consists of the following four parts: the first part is the identification of Ji Yun. This chapter analyzes the relationship between Ji Yun and academic from three aspects: the diachronic evolution of Ji Yun's role, the multiple construction of pedigree and the cause of the times. Ji Yun devoted his life to the research of academic textual research and formed his own academic thinking, which is an irreplaceable important role in Qianjia School. Under the influence of Qianjia School, Ji Yun incorporated his academic thinking and viewpoint into the novel creation. The second part discusses the creative idea of Ji Yun. As a rigorous Qianjia scholar, Ji Yun advocates "the pen of the calligrapher", which is different from "the brush of the scholar". This part discusses in detail that Ji Yun adheres to the traditional stylistic concept under the influence of scholars'thinking. Ji Yun, on the standpoint of traditional bibliography, combines miscellaneous theory with notes, and forms a novel of "combining admonition, textual research and extensive knowledge". Secondly, the rational creative thinking is discussed. The spirit of truthfulness of historians and the spirit of seeking truth from facts form a dialectical and fictitious narrative norm for the creation of "Reading the Notes of Wei Cao Tang". Finally, the paper discusses the external form of Jiyun's teaching through Shinto to highlight the purpose of Ming Tao. The third part discusses the scholar Ji Yun's works of reading the notes of Wei Caotang, leading the novel to the road of academic, scholarly and intellectual. In this article, the author discusses the phenomenon of academic contention between Confucianism, Buddhism, Taoism and Han and Song dynasties, the textual research contents and the characteristics of textual research in the Notes of Reading Weicaotang; The display of Ji Yun's knowledge and talent further discusses Ji Yun's intention to incorporate the scholar's feelings into the novel creation. The fourth part discusses the aesthetic style of reading notes of Wei Caotang presented by the scholar Ji Yun. Under the influence of the scholars advocating rational thinking, Ji Yun is opposed to elaborate, fictional literary style and artistic treatment of novel creation. Ji Yun, by means of the blending of facts and principles, likes to discuss, and so on, makes the notes of reading micro-caucuses show the conception mode of managing the subject's feelings, and shapes a large number of images of Boya and ghosts by good reading, good discussion, good knowledge and good manners. Through simple and concise techniques, simple and distant language skills constitute the aesthetic style of Shang Qi-hua. Through the analysis of the aesthetic style in the novel, the artistic status of Reading the Notes of the Weekly Caotang is further determined.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I207.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳峗;;明清文言小說(shuō)的文體焦慮與尊體實(shí)驗(yàn)——以《剪燈馀話》《閱微草堂筆記》《聊齋志異》為例[J];明清小說(shuō)研究;2014年03期

2 李四龍;;論儒釋道“三教合流”的類(lèi)型[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

3 王平;;儒釋道互補(bǔ)與新舊文化的沖突——論明清小說(shuō)的文化心理特征[J];山東青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

4 王韜;;清代文言小說(shuō)之“雙璧”探微——比較《閱微草堂筆記》與《聊齋志異》的創(chuàng)作筆法和價(jià)值指向[J];明清小說(shuō)研究;2010年03期

5 宋莉華;清代筆記小說(shuō)與乾嘉學(xué)派[J];文學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年04期

6 洛保生;神怪異聞與勸善懲惡——蒲松齡與紀(jì)曉嵐小說(shuō)觀念比較談[J];蒲松齡研究;2000年Z1期

7 許勁松;從《閱微草堂筆記》看作者的創(chuàng)作動(dòng)機(jī)及心態(tài)[J];江海學(xué)刊;1995年04期

8 李劍鋒;試析《聊齋志異》與《閱微草堂筆記》審美創(chuàng)作之異趣[J];山東師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年03期

9 周積明;戴東原與紀(jì)曉嵐[J];安徽史學(xué);1994年03期

10 李劍鋒;情趣與理趣──《聊齋志異》與《閱微草堂筆記》比較研究之一[J];蒲松齡研究;1994年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 胡睿;《閱微草堂筆記》的學(xué)術(shù)化傾向[D];華中師范大學(xué);2012年

2 張偉麗;簡(jiǎn)論紀(jì)昀小說(shuō)理論與《閱微草堂筆記》[D];河北大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2399192