【摘要】：《長(zhǎng)生殿》是一部偉大的作品,是中國(guó)文學(xué)史上當(dāng)之無(wú)愧的經(jīng)典之作。這部經(jīng)典之作自問(wèn)世起,便出現(xiàn)“一時(shí)朱門綺席,酒社歌樓,非此曲不奏,纏頭為之增價(jià)�！�(1)的盛況,雖然經(jīng)歷了短暫的禁演期,但短暫的禁演并沒(méi)有使得《長(zhǎng)生殿》銷聲匿跡,反而比禁演前更加受歡迎。這部經(jīng)典流傳至今仍唱演不衰,有其獨(dú)特的藝術(shù)價(jià)值。本文將從《長(zhǎng)生殿》這部作品如何成為“經(jīng)典”?因何解構(gòu)?如何重構(gòu)?等角度出發(fā),運(yùn)用“經(jīng)典化”理論,分三章來(lái)探討《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典形成以及其重構(gòu)過(guò)程:緒論,簡(jiǎn)單論述了《長(zhǎng)生殿》的典范性地位,是當(dāng)之無(wú)愧的經(jīng)典之作。由此提出論文對(duì)“經(jīng)典”的定義與經(jīng)典特征的認(rèn)識(shí)。繼而,對(duì)《長(zhǎng)生殿》這部經(jīng)典的建構(gòu)要素及其經(jīng)典特征等方面來(lái)梳理當(dāng)代經(jīng)典理論領(lǐng)域的研究成果。第一章,從《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典性特征角度出發(fā),探討《長(zhǎng)生殿》自身所具備的經(jīng)典文本特征和經(jīng)典審美特征,運(yùn)用文學(xué)經(jīng)典建構(gòu)理論,分析《長(zhǎng)生殿》文本具有獨(dú)特藝術(shù)構(gòu)思、豐富的可闡釋空間和普遍的審美理想、生命價(jià)值及其文化價(jià)值等要素,并分析這些構(gòu)建要素對(duì)《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典地位形成的意義與價(jià)值。第二章,從互文性角度出發(fā),觀察《長(zhǎng)生殿》與《長(zhǎng)恨歌》、《梧桐雨》之間的繼承和發(fā)展。從超文性的角度分析《長(zhǎng)生殿》對(duì)前人的借鑒、吸收與創(chuàng)造。由此獲得《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典的“經(jīng)典化”過(guò)程。并從經(jīng)典建構(gòu)的外部因素出發(fā),探討《長(zhǎng)生殿》所具有的經(jīng)典的外部構(gòu)建要素,分析這些外部因素對(duì)《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典地位形成的推動(dòng)作用。第三章,運(yùn)用經(jīng)典化理論,分析《長(zhǎng)生殿》在解構(gòu)主義理論和多元文化的影響下而解構(gòu),解構(gòu)了《長(zhǎng)生殿》的思想內(nèi)涵、經(jīng)典性和權(quán)威性。并從經(jīng)典的重構(gòu)理論出發(fā):一方面,分析《長(zhǎng)生殿》在解構(gòu)主義理論的影響下,文學(xué)史和學(xué)術(shù)研究對(duì)《長(zhǎng)生殿》的推介和重塑;另一方面,分析《長(zhǎng)生殿》在美術(shù)文化、影視文化和網(wǎng)絡(luò)文化的影響下,以各種形式對(duì)《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典的重構(gòu)。通過(guò)對(duì)《長(zhǎng)生殿》經(jīng)典的解構(gòu)和重構(gòu)過(guò)程的闡述,從而說(shuō)明《長(zhǎng)生殿》雖然在形式和內(nèi)容上發(fā)生了變化,但其文學(xué)經(jīng)典的地位不可撼動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:The Hall of Everlife is a great work and a worthy classic in the history of Chinese literature. Since this classic was published, it has appeared that "for a while, Zhu Men Qi Xi, the wine club song building, not this song is not played, and the price is increased by tangles." (1) although it has experienced a short period of ban, But the temporary ban did not make the Hall of Life disappear, but was more popular than it was before the ban. This classic is still sung and performed and has its unique artistic value. How will this work become a "classic" from "the Hall of Life"? Why? How to reconstruct? Based on the theory of "classicalization", this paper discusses the formation and reconstruction process of the "Changsheng Hall" in three chapters: introduction, it is a worthy classic to discuss the exemplary status of the "Changsheng Hall". Therefore, the paper puts forward the definition of "classic" and the understanding of classical features. Then, the author combs the research results of contemporary classical theory on the elements of construction and the characteristics of the classic. In the first chapter, from the perspective of the classical characteristics of the Changsheng Temple, the author discusses the classical text characteristics and the classical aesthetic characteristics of the Changsheng Temple itself, and analyzes the unique artistic conception of the Eternal Hall text by using the literary classical construction theory. The abundant interpretable space and the universal aesthetic ideal, the life value and the cultural value, and so on, and analyzes the significance and value of these construction elements to the formation of the classic status of "the Hall of Changsheng". The second chapter, from the angle of intertextuality, observes the inheritance and development between "the Hall of Everlasting Life" and "Song of Eternal resentment" and "rain of Indus". From the perspective of hypertext, this paper analyzes the reference, absorption and creation of Changsheng Hall to the predecessors. From this, we get the classic process of "classicalization". Starting from the external factors of classical construction, this paper probes into the classical external construction elements and analyzes the role of these external factors in promoting the formation of the classic status. The third chapter uses the classical theory to analyze the deconstruction of Changsheng Hall under the influence of deconstructionism and multiculturalism, and deconstructs the ideological connotation, classics and authoritativeness of Changsheng Temple. Based on the classical reconstruction theory, on the one hand, it analyzes the introduction and remolding of the "Changsheng Hall" by literature history and academic research under the influence of deconstruction theory, on the other hand, it analyzes the art culture of the "Changsheng Hall". Under the influence of film and television culture and network culture, it reconstructs the Classics in various forms. By expounding the process of deconstruction and reconstruction of the Classics of Changsheng Temple, it can be concluded that although the form and content of Changsheng Temple have changed, the status of its literary classics can not be shaken.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I207.37

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王詩(shī)瑤;;從“釵盒情緣”看洪f的至情觀[J];景德鎮(zhèn)高專學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

2 徐龍飛;;小議“金釵鈿盒”在《長(zhǎng)生殿》中的作用[J];戲曲藝術(shù);2010年04期

3 顧兆琳;;昆曲唱腔的音樂(lè)特征——談全本《長(zhǎng)生殿》的曲[J];戲劇藝術(shù);2009年04期

4 孫桂平;;論《長(zhǎng)生殿》的情愛(ài)主題與寫情藝術(shù)[J];溫州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

5 李燕;;淺談洪日升《長(zhǎng)生殿》中的“梧桐”意象[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2008年03期

6 董雁;;《長(zhǎng)生殿》:一部鬧熱的《牡丹亭》——《長(zhǎng)生殿》與《牡丹亭》“至情”文化主題比較[J];陜西師范大學(xué)繼續(xù)教育學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

7 王冬梅;;千古帝妃情 異代文人心——論《長(zhǎng)恨歌》《梧桐雨》《長(zhǎng)生殿》作者的情感取向[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2006年04期

8 趙山林;;“專寫釵盒情緣”——《長(zhǎng)生殿》怎樣寫“情”[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

9 余琳;;淺析《西廂記》與《長(zhǎng)生殿》的異同[J];湖南工業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

10 蔣德均;《長(zhǎng)生殿》與《桃花扇》結(jié)構(gòu)藝術(shù)比較[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高艷芳;中國(guó)白蛇傳經(jīng)典的建構(gòu)與闡釋[D];華中師范大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 湯斌;楊玉環(huán)形象演變研究[D];陜西理工學(xué)院;2014年

2 吳婷婷;閻連科小說(shuō)的生存意識(shí)及現(xiàn)代性反思[D];西南大學(xué);2013年

3 劉鵬;西廂記經(jīng)典化研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2012年

4 王文華;《長(zhǎng)生殿》接受研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

5 時(shí)雙雙;《長(zhǎng)生殿》之清代接受研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

6 曹愛(ài);《長(zhǎng)生殿》敘事結(jié)構(gòu)研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2008年

7 王巖;從洪升對(duì)相關(guān)歷史材料的處理再看《長(zhǎng)生殿》的主題思想[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年

8 劉紅艷;當(dāng)時(shí)失意雖可恨，猶得千古文人傳[D];曲阜師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：2244667