后朦朧詩(shī)與元曲的解構(gòu)美學(xué)
[Abstract]:Although there are thousands of years between post-obscure poetry and Yuan qu in the history of literature, they both revolt against the traditional literature from the foundation, thus showing a common aesthetic tendency of deconstruction, that is, opposing literature has a fixed center. Literature is no longer the tool of others, but the subject of self-expression. At the same time, there is a fixed explanation for the opposition to literature in post-obscure poetry and Yuan qu. The poet thinks that the meaning of poetry should be contextualized, multi-explanatory, connected with previous works, or even unsolved. The spirit of freedom is the most important spirit of post-obscure poetry and Yuan qu, all rules no longer exist, can express everything, can be expressed in any way. The first chapter mainly studies the deconstruction center of post-obscurity poetry and Yuan qu, which deconstructs the nature of spiritualization, restores sex to the physical level, and at the same time highlights the female's active sexual desire and consciousness. The Yuan qu deconstructs the death with social value, and it is no difference between death "heavier than Mount Tai" or "lighter than Mao". At the same time, the poet deconstructed the daily life, denied that there are still deep essential laws under the daily life, they only feel happy in the rough primitive life itself. Post-obscurity poetry and Yuan qu transcend culture at the same time, they think that cultural metaphors, symbols, obscured the origin of the universe. Heroes are also their deconstruction goals. They restore heroes to human beings. The second chapter mainly discusses the artistic presentation of "rebellion" between post-obscure poetry and Yuan qu, which breaks the fixed relationship between signifier and signifier, and changes from Yuan qu and post-obscurity poem to "ci Fengyi covenant" and "words without substance". Post-obscure poetry and Yuan qu also intentionally misread the classical works of the predecessors, rewriting the elegance and sublime of the original into humor and popular. The carnival techniques are also often displayed in Yuan qu and post-obscure poems, releasing the passion of language and life. They also break the discourse hegemony of Putonghua and use dialects extensively in poetry, which makes poetry show a different sense of language than before. The third chapter mainly explores the free spirit of post-obscure poetry and Yuan qu, first of all, the spirit of Dionysus, Yuan qu and post-obscure poetry in the works to promote irrationality, poetry has a strong self-instillation. And then there's the spirit of play, their poetry sometimes wants to convey any values, writing just for fun, for fun. There is also the extreme spirit of Yuan qu and post-hazy poetry, which are like extremists in the field of poetry. The spirit of black humor is also very obvious in their works. It uses laughter to write sadness, sorrow and joy, and reveals the cruel absurdity behind the world in a humorous way. The last chapter discusses the writing mythology of Yuan qu and post-hazy poems. The author thinks that the writing of Yuan qu and post-hazy poems is "common work anger is not enough" type, and their broken "Zhou Shan" is what Derrida calls "presence". In other words, the center and essence, they break the foundation of traditional literature. And their creation is like a flood of broken pillars, ugly, dirty, erotic, self, irrational, immoral things that are directly visible to people.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:四川省社會(huì)科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:I207.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 畢嬌嬌;;元曲詞匯研究綜述[J];忻州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期
2 趙紅;;元曲發(fā)展及其語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象研究[J];長(zhǎng)江叢刊;2016年14期
3 羅麒;;21世紀(jì)詩(shī)歌:“代際”寫作中的身份認(rèn)同[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2016年03期
4 王曉升;;死亡控制與權(quán)力誕生——評(píng)鮑德里亞對(duì)權(quán)力產(chǎn)生根源的分析[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期
5 林平喬;;第三代詩(shī)人創(chuàng)作中的古典詩(shī)歌因子[J];南通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年03期
6 游弋;;2009:成都詩(shī)歌研究[J];青年作家;2010年10期
7 李建周;;第三代詩(shī)歌的認(rèn)同焦慮——以“1986'現(xiàn)代詩(shī)群體大展”為中心[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2009年08期
8 吳矛;;論第三代詩(shī)歌的“反詩(shī)歌”傾向[J];黃岡師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
9 焦冬梅;;試論元曲語(yǔ)匯的口語(yǔ)性[J];理論界;2006年06期
10 林紅,沈玲;宋元之際民族融合下的文學(xué)轉(zhuǎn)型[J];長(zhǎng)春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期
,本文編號(hào):2162808
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2162808.html