本文選題：文學(xué)頒獎(jiǎng)詞 + 文學(xué)批評(píng)　； 參考：《山東理工大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：文學(xué)評(píng)獎(jiǎng)活動(dòng)是一種文學(xué)批評(píng)活動(dòng),其核心任務(wù)是對(duì)文學(xué)作品做出價(jià)值評(píng)判。高層次的文學(xué)評(píng)獎(jiǎng)活動(dòng)以其專(zhuān)業(yè)性、規(guī)范性、集體性與權(quán)威性對(duì)文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與文學(xué)批評(píng)的發(fā)展起著重要的推動(dòng)作用。文學(xué)頒獎(jiǎng)詞作為文學(xué)評(píng)獎(jiǎng)活動(dòng)最終做出的書(shū)面結(jié)論,其文學(xué)批評(píng)文本的屬性是毋庸置疑的。文學(xué)頒獎(jiǎng)詞集中體現(xiàn)了評(píng)委會(huì)對(duì)獲獎(jiǎng)作品的價(jià)值評(píng)判,不僅在較大程度上影響著不同時(shí)期文學(xué)創(chuàng)作的價(jià)值取向,對(duì)文學(xué)創(chuàng)作產(chǎn)生著重要的價(jià)值導(dǎo)向作用,而且作為文學(xué)批評(píng)的一種特殊文本也體現(xiàn)出文學(xué)批評(píng)自身的價(jià)值取向,對(duì)文學(xué)批評(píng)的價(jià)值選擇同樣具有引導(dǎo)意義。進(jìn)入新時(shí)期之后,我國(guó)出現(xiàn)種類(lèi)繁多、形式多樣的文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng),有全國(guó)性的獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng),也有區(qū)域性的獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng),有綜合類(lèi)的獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng),也有針對(duì)不同文體的獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng),對(duì)中國(guó)當(dāng)代文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與批評(píng)的發(fā)展有著程度不一的影響。隨著社會(huì)歷史語(yǔ)境的不斷變化,文學(xué)頒獎(jiǎng)詞呈現(xiàn)出階段性特征,其價(jià)值評(píng)判在不同的階段有著不同的側(cè)重點(diǎn),構(gòu)成了新時(shí)期以來(lái)文學(xué)與文學(xué)批評(píng)在價(jià)值追求上發(fā)展演變的大致軌跡。從整體來(lái)看,頒獎(jiǎng)詞對(duì)文學(xué)的價(jià)值評(píng)判主要分為社會(huì)歷史價(jià)值評(píng)判、審美價(jià)值評(píng)判、人性?xún)r(jià)值評(píng)判和文化價(jià)值評(píng)判等多個(gè)方面,其中,社會(huì)歷史價(jià)值評(píng)判主要體現(xiàn)在對(duì)作品中社會(huì)歷史現(xiàn)象所做出的價(jià)值評(píng)判、對(duì)創(chuàng)作主體社會(huì)歷史價(jià)值觀的評(píng)判;審美價(jià)值評(píng)判主要體現(xiàn)在對(duì)作者審美價(jià)值觀的評(píng)判、對(duì)作品審美特色的價(jià)值評(píng)判以及對(duì)作品審美功能的評(píng)判;人性?xún)r(jià)值評(píng)判主要體現(xiàn)在對(duì)文學(xué)描寫(xiě)人性的肯定以及對(duì)作品展現(xiàn)的人性觀的評(píng)判;文化價(jià)值評(píng)判體現(xiàn)在充分肯定作品對(duì)民族文化特色的呈現(xiàn)、高度贊揚(yáng)作品對(duì)古典文化的傳承以及對(duì)傳統(tǒng)美德的弘揚(yáng)。這些價(jià)值評(píng)判并非完美無(wú)缺,而是有得有失,其優(yōu)點(diǎn)主要體現(xiàn)為多元并舉,兼收并蓄;堅(jiān)持弘揚(yáng)主流價(jià)值觀;立足當(dāng)下,與時(shí)俱進(jìn);其缺陷則主要體現(xiàn)在以多元性代替先進(jìn)性、價(jià)值評(píng)判失之偏頗、以闡釋代替評(píng)判等方面。頒獎(jiǎng)詞反映了文學(xué)批評(píng)文本的一般規(guī)律與特征,并對(duì)文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與文學(xué)批評(píng)產(chǎn)生了一定的價(jià)值導(dǎo)向效應(yīng),對(duì)當(dāng)代文學(xué)價(jià)值觀念的發(fā)展以及文學(xué)創(chuàng)作與文學(xué)批評(píng)的價(jià)值取向都產(chǎn)生了一定的引導(dǎo)作用。其中既有正確的引導(dǎo),也存在價(jià)值誤導(dǎo)現(xiàn)象。頒獎(jiǎng)詞作為一種重要的文學(xué)批評(píng)文本,與文學(xué)批評(píng)是一種同構(gòu)同建的關(guān)系。一方面,文學(xué)頒獎(jiǎng)詞的發(fā)展與完善必須建立在文學(xué)批評(píng)整體發(fā)展與完善的前提之下,必須健全文學(xué)批評(píng)價(jià)值體系、促進(jìn)文學(xué)批評(píng)價(jià)值導(dǎo)向功能的整體優(yōu)化;另一方面,頒獎(jiǎng)詞價(jià)值導(dǎo)向功能的優(yōu)化又會(huì)促進(jìn)整個(gè)文學(xué)批評(píng)價(jià)值導(dǎo)向功能的健全,因此,必須高度重視頒獎(jiǎng)詞的獨(dú)特作用,樹(shù)立正確的評(píng)獎(jiǎng)理念,提高批評(píng)主體的整體素質(zhì),健全評(píng)獎(jiǎng)機(jī)制,完善評(píng)獎(jiǎng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),最終達(dá)到二者互促共建的目的。
[Abstract]:Literary evaluation is a kind of literary criticism, whose core task is to make value judgment on literary works. The high-level literary awards play an important role in the development of literary creation and literary criticism with their professionalism, standardization, collectivity and authority. As the final conclusion of literary awards, the nature of literary criticism is beyond doubt. The literary award speech embodies the value judgment of the award winning works by the jury, which not only influences the value orientation of literary creation in different periods, but also plays an important role in the value orientation of literary creation. Moreover, as a special text of literary criticism, it also reflects the value orientation of literary criticism itself, and also has guiding significance to the value choice of literary criticism. After entering the new era, there are a wide variety of literary awards in various forms in our country. There are national awards, regional awards, comprehensive awards, and awards for different styles. It has different influence on the development of Chinese contemporary literature creation and criticism. With the continuous change of social and historical context, literary awards words show stage characteristics, and their value evaluation has different emphases at different stages. It constitutes the development and evolution of literature and literary criticism in the pursuit of value since the new period. On the whole, the evaluation of the literature value of the awarding words is mainly divided into social and historical value evaluation, aesthetic value evaluation, human nature value evaluation and cultural value evaluation and so on. The evaluation of social and historical value is mainly reflected in the evaluation of the social and historical phenomena in the works, the evaluation of the social and historical values of the creative subject, the evaluation of the aesthetic value of the author, and the evaluation of the author's aesthetic value. The evaluation of the value of the aesthetic features of the works and the aesthetic function of the works, the evaluation of the value of human nature is mainly reflected in the affirmation of the human nature described in literature and the evaluation of the view of human nature displayed in the works. The evaluation of cultural value is embodied in the full affirmation of the presentation of the national cultural characteristics in the works, the high praise for the inheritance of the classical culture and the promotion of the traditional virtues in the works. These value judgments are not perfect, but have gains and losses. The advantages of these judgments are mainly reflected in the combination of diversity and assimilation; upholding the mainstream values; standing at the moment and keeping pace with the times; and its shortcomings are mainly reflected in the substitution of diversity for advanced nature. The evaluation of value is biased and the interpretation is used to replace the judgment. The award words reflect the general laws and characteristics of literary criticism texts, and have a certain value guiding effect on literary creation and literary criticism. It plays a guiding role in the development of contemporary literary values and the value orientation of literary creation and literary criticism. There are both correct guidance and value misdirection. As an important literary critical text, award-awarding word is a kind of isomorphic relationship with literary criticism. On the one hand, the development and perfection of literary award words must be based on the premise of the overall development and perfection of literary criticism, and the value system of literary criticism must be perfected to promote the overall optimization of the function of literary criticism's value-oriented orientation, on the other hand, The optimization of the value-oriented function of the awarding words will also promote the perfection of the value-oriented function of the literary criticism. Therefore, we must attach great importance to the unique role of the award words, establish a correct concept of award evaluation, and improve the overall quality of the subject of criticism. Perfect the mechanism of prize evaluation, perfect the standard of prize evaluation, and finally achieve the goal of mutual promotion of the two.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.7

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 莊杰;;淺談?lì)C獎(jiǎng)詞的寫(xiě)作技巧——以“感動(dòng)中國(guó)”為例[J];應(yīng)用寫(xiě)作;2009年06期

2 周祖亮;方懿林;;頒獎(jiǎng)詞的語(yǔ)言藝術(shù)[J];閱讀與寫(xiě)作;2006年05期

3 韓佳蔚;;修辭的美麗與魅力——“感動(dòng)中國(guó)”2006年度人物頒獎(jiǎng)詞修辭藝術(shù)管窺[J];文教資料;2007年17期

4 曾利斌;;注重表達(dá)方式 造成鮮明對(duì)比——談2008“感動(dòng)中國(guó)”年度人物頒獎(jiǎng)詞[J];閱讀與寫(xiě)作;2010年04期

5 郝世寧;;2010感動(dòng)中國(guó)頒獎(jiǎng)詞的韻律美[J];文學(xué)教育(上);2010年05期

6 郁芳;;“感動(dòng)中國(guó)”頒獎(jiǎng)詞的語(yǔ)言美[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年02期

7 張宏梁;;迸發(fā)正能量的“濃縮鈾”——談?wù)劇陡袆?dòng)中國(guó)》頒獎(jiǎng)詞的特點(diǎn)[J];應(yīng)用寫(xiě)作;2013年09期

8 楊玉霞;;析“感動(dòng)中國(guó)”頒獎(jiǎng)詞的修辭美[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2013年23期

9 甄靜慧;;陳葒:不愿做校長(zhǎng)的教育家[J];南風(fēng)窗;2013年26期

10 黎瀟宇;;頒獎(jiǎng)詞寫(xiě)作初探[J];應(yīng)用寫(xiě)作;2006年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 南京市花園小學(xué) 郭淼;評(píng)選“感動(dòng)人物” 體驗(yàn)另類(lèi)復(fù)習(xí)[N];成才導(dǎo)報(bào).教育周刊;2007年

2 ;2009中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)女性年度發(fā)展人物頒獎(jiǎng)詞[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2010年

3 ;二○○九年十大感動(dòng)地暖行業(yè)人物[N];中國(guó)建設(shè)報(bào);2010年

4 整理 許凱;2010“影響濟(jì)南”年度創(chuàng)新人物[N];濟(jì)南日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

5 整理 許凱;2010“影響濟(jì)南”年度創(chuàng)業(yè)英才[N];濟(jì)南日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

6 記者 廖巍巍;22家最具社會(huì)責(zé)任感企業(yè)受表彰[N];黃石日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

7 李中原 閻海峰 劉華山 蘇凱 張錕;至誠(chéng)至情至愛(ài) 他們感動(dòng)天中[N];駐馬店日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

8 本報(bào)記者 尚志鵬;學(xué)生為他撰寫(xiě)頒獎(jiǎng)詞[N];三峽日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

9 本報(bào)記者 霍群珍　見(jiàn)習(xí)記者 吉星;黃石美景：掀起你的蓋頭來(lái)[N];黃石日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

10 ;安徽“十大新聞人物”[N];安徽日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 郁芳;“感動(dòng)中國(guó)”頒獎(jiǎng)詞的言語(yǔ)風(fēng)格[D];湖北師范學(xué)院;2012年

2 李婷;新時(shí)期文學(xué)頒獎(jiǎng)詞與文學(xué)批評(píng)的價(jià)值導(dǎo)向[D];山東理工大學(xué);2016年

3 翟方方;從評(píng)價(jià)理論視角探析諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)?lì)C獎(jiǎng)詞中的態(tài)度意義[D];鄭州大學(xué);2014年

4 潘紅彬;漢語(yǔ)頒獎(jiǎng)詞的態(tài)度意義分析[D];河南大學(xué);2011年

5 劉文姣;奧斯卡頒獎(jiǎng)詞的文體及文化內(nèi)涵分析[D];長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué);2011年

6 趙茜;諾貝爾文學(xué)獎(jiǎng)?lì)C獎(jiǎng)詞的文體分析[D];北京工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2095108