本文選題：《檀弓》 + 評(píng)點(diǎn)�。� 參考：《文學(xué)遺產(chǎn)》2017年04期

【摘要】：明代中葉以降,《禮記·檀弓》批點(diǎn)本頗為流行,是儒家經(jīng)典被重新"文學(xué)經(jīng)典化"的一個(gè)突出案例。批點(diǎn)本《檀弓》并非如《四庫(kù)全書(shū)總目》所疑,出于明末偽托,其文獻(xiàn)源頭可以追溯到楊慎的《檀弓叢訓(xùn)》,成書(shū)下限不晚于弘治十五年(1502)�！短垂放c(diǎn)及其所代表的"以文論經(jīng)"的風(fēng)尚,也并非始于晚明,而是明中期以來(lái)復(fù)古思潮向博學(xué)泛覽方向發(fā)展的結(jié)果。儒家經(jīng)書(shū)《檀弓》,在科舉的知識(shí)領(lǐng)域中受到忽視,出于文章趣味而圈點(diǎn)、批評(píng)、選輯或單獨(dú)刊行之,實(shí)為其"再經(jīng)典化"之契機(jī)。以《檀弓》為代表的一批古書(shū)被視為文章范本,隱然拆去了經(jīng)、史、子、集之間的門(mén)限,擴(kuò)展了一般讀書(shū)人的知識(shí)視野,正是明清之際士人思想與文學(xué)世界的一大變局。
[Abstract]:In the middle of the Ming Dynasty, the sandalwood bow of the Book of Rites was quite popular, which was an outstanding case of the reversion of Confucian classics into literary canonization. This sandalwood bow is not suspected of the end of the Ming Dynasty, as in the book of contents of Siku. The source of its literature can be traced back to Yang Shen's "sandalwood arches". The lower limit of the book was not later than 15 years after Hongzhi. But since the middle of the Ming Dynasty, the trend of thought to the development of the direction of erudite. Sandalwood Arch, which is neglected in the field of imperial examination, is the opportunity of "re-classicalization" by criticizing, selecting or publishing it alone. A number of ancient books, represented by sandalwood arch, were regarded as model articles, and the threshold between classics, history, children and collections was hidden, which expanded the knowledge horizon of general scholars, which was a great change in the thought and literary world of scholars in Ming and Qing dynasties.
【作者單位】： 香港中文大學(xué)中國(guó)語(yǔ)言及文學(xué)系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I206.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2030155