本文選題：向林冰　切入點(diǎn)：民族形式的中心源泉　出處：《文學(xué)評(píng)論》2017年02期

【摘要】：向林冰在文藝民族形式論爭(zhēng)中提出的"民族形式中心源泉"論,是他所在的通俗讀物編刊社于抗戰(zhàn)初期尋求轉(zhuǎn)型的產(chǎn)物。通過批判自身的工具主義取向,編刊社自覺接續(xù)"五四"民間文學(xué)論的文脈,試圖激活"舊形式"的文藝屬性。作為編刊社的首席理論家,向林冰以歷史唯物主義話語重構(gòu)"五四文藝史觀",在戰(zhàn)時(shí)"利用舊形式"的大氛圍下,重新確認(rèn)了民間文學(xué)之于新文學(xué)創(chuàng)構(gòu)的重要意義。但向林冰受制于通俗化實(shí)踐的既定經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)白話文學(xué)論的把握存在明顯偏差,其"中心源泉"論過分拘泥于民間形式的"口頭告白性質(zhì)",偏離了中國(guó)現(xiàn)代語文變革運(yùn)動(dòng)的"言文一致"主線。
[Abstract]:The theory of "the central source of national form" put forward by Lin Bing in the debate of literary and artistic national forms is the product of his popular reading and publication agency seeking transformation in the early stage of the War of Resistance against Japan. Through criticizing his own instrumentalism orientation, he put forward the theory of "the central source of national form". As the chief theorist of the editor's magazine, he consciously continued the literary context of "May 4th" folklore theory and tried to activate the literary and artistic attributes of the "old form". Lin Bing reconstructs the May 4th Literary and Art Historical View with historical materialism, and under the general atmosphere of "using the old form" in wartime, It reconfirms the importance of folk literature to the creation of new literature, but Lin Bing is subject to the established experience of popularization practice, and there are obvious deviations in grasping the theory of vernacular literature. His "central source" theory is too restricted to the folk form of "oral confession", which deviates from the main line of "the unity of speech and prose" of the Chinese modern Chinese reform movement.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)中文系;
【分類號(hào)】：I206.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 周七康;;為“周文文庫”再次捐贈(zèng)文物[J];上海魯迅研究;2011年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：1657550