本文選題：《六朝選詩(shī)定論》　切入點(diǎn)：批評(píng)方法　出處：《江南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：吳淇《六朝選詩(shī)定論》是刊行于清初的一本解說(shuō)選詩(shī)的著作,在理論闡述和批評(píng)實(shí)踐兩方面都有值得詳加考察的成績(jī)。其中最重要的是“以意逆志”的拓展、細(xì)化和具體運(yùn)用,以及參證方法的提出、構(gòu)建和具體運(yùn)用。這兩種批評(píng)方法的討論是本文的主要內(nèi)容。“以意逆志”自孟子提出后,經(jīng)過(guò)后世學(xué)者的踵事增華,成為中國(guó)批評(píng)史最基本的一種批評(píng)方法。在吳淇的闡述中,“意”的內(nèi)涵從漢宋諸儒講的讀者之意改為作者之意,以作者之意推求作者之志是就詩(shī)論詩(shī);實(shí)現(xiàn)“以意逆志”的關(guān)鍵則在于讀者與作者在文本之中的語(yǔ)境融合。吳淇由此完成對(duì)“以意逆志”的詮釋路徑和內(nèi)涵的拓展。這種拓展在解說(shuō)選詩(shī)中的表現(xiàn),是提出因、緣、想三種要素,細(xì)化詮解的過(guò)程,并在批評(píng)實(shí)踐中形成幾種具體方法。另外,“以意逆志”與“知人論世”,漢宋諸儒分而論之,并未形成關(guān)聯(lián)。吳淇在批評(píng)實(shí)踐中溝通論人論世與論詩(shī)論志,是清代中期以后兩個(gè)命題實(shí)現(xiàn)真正結(jié)合的先聲。參證方法是吳淇提出的一種新的批評(píng)方法,是在文本之間尋求詮解依據(jù)和解說(shuō)辦法的一種方法。吳淇相信,在歷史和傳記資料之外,詩(shī)歌傳統(tǒng)和相關(guān)文本有助于選詩(shī)旨意的發(fā)現(xiàn)和確定。吳淇建構(gòu)“三際”的詩(shī)統(tǒng),論述選詩(shī)所屬的第二際“漢道”,這是參證方法的理論基礎(chǔ);又在選詩(shī)解說(shuō)中,討論各種類型的文本之間的聯(lián)系及其含義,這是參證方法的具體而精彩的運(yùn)用。吳淇提出的參證方法,既可在鐘嶸的推源溯流和宋人的點(diǎn)化述作中找到學(xué)術(shù)淵源,又可在西學(xué)的互文理論中發(fā)現(xiàn)中西攸同的理論旨趣,是應(yīng)該得到認(rèn)同和繼承的一種批評(píng)方法。
[Abstract]:Wu Qi's conclusion on selected Poems of the six dynasties was published in the early Qing Dynasty. It has both theoretical elaboration and criticism and practice. The most important of these is the expansion, refinement and concrete application of "opposing will with intention". The discussion of these two critical methods is the main content of this paper. In Wu Qi's exposition, the meaning of "Yi" is changed from the reader's meaning of Han and Song Dynasty to that of the author, and the author's will is derived from the author's meaning. The key to the realization of "opposing the will with meaning" lies in the fusion of the context of the reader and the author in the text. Wu Qi has thus completed the expansion of the interpretation path and connotation of "against the will with meaning". The performance of this expansion in the interpretation of the selected poems is due to the reason and the reason. Think of three elements, refine the process of interpretation, and form several concrete methods in the practice of criticism. Wu Qi, in his criticism practice, was the forerunner of the real combination of the two propositions after the middle of the Qing Dynasty. The method of reference and proof was a new criticism method put forward by Wu Qi. Wu Qi believes that, in addition to historical and biographical data, poetic traditions and related texts are helpful in the discovery and determination of the will to select poems. Wu Qi constructs a "three-tier" poetic system. This paper discusses the second "Han Dao" of poetry selection, which is the theoretical basis of reference method, and discusses the connection and meaning of various types of texts in the explanation of poetry selection. This is a concrete and wonderful application of the method of reference and evidence. Wu Qi's method of reference and evidence can not only find academic origins in Zhong Rong's pushing back to the source, but also find the same theoretical purport between China and the West in the theory of intertextuality in western studies. Is a method of criticism that should be recognized and inherited.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I207.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉陽(yáng),周新鳳;河南省圖書(shū)館館藏善本清代河南籍作家稀見(jiàn)本詩(shī)集提要[J];河南圖書(shū)館學(xué)刊;1998年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 王冠玉;吳淇《六朝選詩(shī)定論》研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2016年

2 傅寶龍;清初謝靈運(yùn)詩(shī)歌批評(píng)研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2015年

3 鐘張麗;論吳淇《六朝選詩(shī)定論》“三際”中詩(shī)與樂(lè)的關(guān)系[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

4 劉一，

本文編號(hào)：1596272