發(fā)布時間：2018-03-11 00:33

  本文選題：梁章鉅　切入點：《退庵論文》　出處：《廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：梁章鉅《退庵論文》重提六朝"文筆之辨",厘清"文"之內(nèi)涵,意在提高駢文地位,批駁古文家窮經(jīng)注史、遠(yuǎn)離文之本質(zhì)、貶低駢文的觀點。較之阮元尊體駢文、否定古文為"文"的矯枉過正,梁章鉅通達(dá)折中,主張駢文、古文并重,異途同源,駢散結(jié)合,不必獨尊正統(tǒng)。他反對"以古文為時文"和"以時文為古文"的兩相妨害,強調(diào)古文和八股時文的互學(xué)才能兩相成就,較阮元將八股文視為駢文一脈之觀點客觀公正。梁章鉅稱《文選》駢體、散體并選,并非駢文選本,批駁古文家對《文選》的輕視。梁章鉅駢散結(jié)合的文體觀調(diào)和了清中葉古文、駢文之爭,為古文、駢文創(chuàng)作和理論的發(fā)展做出了一定貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Liang Zhangju's thesis on retreating Um restates the argument of the six dynasties' literary style, clarifies the connotation of "Wen" in order to improve the status of parallel prose, refute the viewpoint that the ancient prose family annotates history, is far away from the essence of literature, and belittles parallel prose. Compared with Ruan Yuan Zun's parallel prose, To deny that ancient prose is an overcorrection of "prose", Liang Zhangju-ju-zhou-just-in-between, and to advocate parallel prose, ancient prose with equal emphasis on the same source of different paths, and the combination of parallel prose and prose, without having to respect the orthodoxy alone. He opposed the two aspects of "taking ancient prose as the present style" and "taking the contemporary style as the ancient prose" as a hindrance. Emphasizing the achievement of mutual learning between ancient prose and stereotyped prose, and comparing Ruan Yuan's view that eight-part prose is regarded as a vein of parallel prose is objective and just. Liang Zhanggu's style view of combining parallel prose and prose reconciled the dispute between ancient prose and parallel prose in the middle of Qing Dynasty, and contributed to the development of ancient prose, parallel prose creation and theory.
【作者單位】： 廣西師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“歷代駢文研究文獻(xiàn)集成”(15ZDB068) 廣西省哲社項目(17FZW001) 廣西博士后專項資助(KS392) 桂學(xué)研究院項目(201605)“梁章鉅《三管英靈集》研究”
【分類號】：I207.22

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 劉再華;漢宋之爭與清代文筆之辨[J];求索;2003年06期

2 萬書婷;;南朝“文筆之辨”及作家地位之升降[J];蘭州工業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2012年06期

3 楊賽;;南朝文筆之辨[J];浙江師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期

4 胡大雷;;《尚書》“筆”體考述——最早的書面文字與“文筆之辨”溯源[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年05期

5 蔣祖怡;;劉勰對“文筆之辨”的卓越貢獻(xiàn)[J];杭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1988年01期

6 蔣祖怡;;劉勰對“文筆之辨”的卓越貢獻(xiàn)[J];杭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1988年01期

7 范洪杰;宋瑞婷;;阮元“選學(xué)”觀中的“文筆之辨”問題[J];華中人文論叢;2012年02期

8 王曉萌;;論晉宋之際文筆之辨的社會背景[J];文學(xué)遺產(chǎn);2011年04期

，

本文編號：1595817