本文關(guān)鍵詞： 孫犁 晉察冀 抗戰(zhàn)文藝 白洋淀文學(xué)　出處：《現(xiàn)代中文學(xué)刊》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：有關(guān)孫犁的既有研究通常專注其抗戰(zhàn)小說中的非戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)性因素,強(qiáng)調(diào)其抒情文本內(nèi)部所包蘊(yùn)的"異質(zhì)"成分,進(jìn)而認(rèn)為孫犁并未真正融入革命主流、乃是其中的"多余人"。然而若是考慮到孫犁個(gè)人"成長(zhǎng)史"與解放區(qū)抗戰(zhàn)實(shí)踐之間的緊密聯(lián)系,此類"剝離式"研究實(shí)際上未能觸及抗戰(zhàn)文藝寫作與日常動(dòng)員背景之間的有機(jī)關(guān)聯(lián),它所暴露的與其說是孫犁自身的匱乏,不如說是現(xiàn)有研究范式在定義"革命"時(shí)的狹隘——后者僅僅被想象為階級(jí)斗爭(zhēng)、政治批判等內(nèi)容。對(duì)此,本文的研究不僅指向?qū)O犁個(gè)人,將其寫作實(shí)踐放置于"文藝—?jiǎng)訂T"的互動(dòng)關(guān)系中進(jìn)行政治情景的勾連;更指向"革命"本身,意在闡明"革命"作為多重經(jīng)驗(yàn)的綜合體,其于日常生活中所蘊(yùn)含的更為細(xì)膩、在地的一面。此時(shí),無論作為理論工作者抑或文學(xué)創(chuàng)作者的孫犁,無論作為審美范疇抑或事務(wù)性工作的文藝,諸種不同的面向?qū)⑼鹊丶{入本文的考查范圍。
[Abstract]:The existing studies on Sun Li usually focus on the non-war factors in his novels of the War of Resistance, emphasizing the "heterogeneity" in his lyric text, and then thinking that Sun Li has not really integrated into the mainstream of the revolution. However, considering the close connection between Sun Li's personal "growth history" and the practice of the Anti-Japanese War in the liberated areas. In fact, this kind of "stripping" study failed to touch on the organic connection between the writing of literature and art in the War of Resistance against Japan and the background of daily mobilization. What it exposed was not so much the lack of Sun Li itself. Rather, it is the narrowness of the existing research paradigm in defining "revolution"-the latter is only imagined as class struggle, political criticism, etc. For this, the study of this paper not only points to Sun Li personally. Put its writing practice in the interactive relationship of "literature and art-mobilization" to connect the political scene; More pointed to the "revolution" itself, intended to clarify the "revolution" as a complex of multiple experiences, its daily life contains a more delicate, on the ground side. At this time. Whether as a theoretical worker or a literary creator Sun Li whether as an aesthetic category or a routine work of literature and art various different faces will be equally included in the scope of this study.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)中國(guó)語言文學(xué)系;
【分類號(hào)】：I207.42
【正文快照】： 何種“革命"?從目前的文學(xué)研究來看,對(duì)于“四十年代孫犁”的討論是一個(gè)已經(jīng)達(dá)成了某種定論、卻又尚未被充分開掘的話題。盡管孫犁自抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)初期就開始了創(chuàng)作之路,現(xiàn)有的研究卻通常忽略了其文學(xué)的“成長(zhǎng)史”,而選擇直接以1945年的《荷花淀》《蘆花蕩》等作品作為論述起點(diǎn),與之

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 溫秀珍;;談?wù)務(wù){(diào)查報(bào)告語言的修改[J];應(yīng)用寫作;2001年01期

2 皇甫修文;;論文章寫作中的疏密藝術(shù)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);1987年05期

3 ;北京寫作協(xié)會(huì)梨花村研討會(huì)成功召開[J];黃河之聲;2012年07期

4 王進(jìn);似斷實(shí)連的藝術(shù)畫卷——談散文畫面的組接技巧[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1486676