本文關(guān)鍵詞：論西方學(xué)界的李賀研究　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 漢學(xué) 李賀 象征 比較

【摘要】：在文學(xué)史上,"鬼才"李賀以"奇"著稱,他的詩人形象和他的詩作一樣獨特。西方漢學(xué)家對李賀其人其詩的獨特性展開了各方各面的研究,本文試圖對此做一個全局的觀照,并從西方學(xué)者的文化角度和研究方法出發(fā),對他們的研究做出自己的分析和評價。首先,通過歷史的對比,宇文所安解讀了《李賀小傳》中獨特的詩人形象。筆者關(guān)注宇文所安對"特性"的理解,論述了宇文所安對李賀形象解讀的合理性。陳穎從比較文學(xué)的視角出發(fā),比較了濟(jì)慈和李賀的生平與詩歌生涯,這是跨文化理解李賀的第一次嘗試。筆者從方法論意義上探討了陳穎研究的重要意義,同時也指出了其中存在的不足。此外,西方漢學(xué)家從各自的文化觀點出發(fā),考察了李賀詩歌中神話、鬼魅和自然世界,并從宗教觀念、生命意識、自然觀念等角度展開了不同的解讀。薛愛華將李賀的神女形象置于文學(xué)的演進(jìn)之中考察。克里斯坦森將李賀詩歌中的鬼魅意象和愛倫坡筆下的死神相比較。福羅德沙姆從佛教的觀點解讀了李賀的生命意識,宇文所安從自然觀念的轉(zhuǎn)變對李賀筆下的風(fēng)景進(jìn)行了解讀。筆者從中西文化的差異出發(fā),考察了西方學(xué)者視角和觀點的新意,同時也指出了其中的某些誤讀。同時,基于杜牧對李賀詩歌"理雖不足"的評價中"理"的不同理解,宇文所安、克朗和拉弗勒分別從詩歌的并置結(jié)構(gòu)、獨特的結(jié)尾以及意象的象征手法出發(fā),對李賀詩歌的特點展開了精彩的論述。西方學(xué)者對文本不同的解讀和版本之間的比較值得關(guān)注。此外,羅伯遜對李賀用字的量化研究和杜國清對李賀詩歌音樂性的分析為李賀詩歌藝術(shù)特性的把握提供了新的思路,但同時筆者也指出了他們各自研究中的局限。本文試圖呈現(xiàn)西方學(xué)界李賀研究的面貌,突出西方學(xué)界研究的重點和方法,并做出必要的辨析,為國內(nèi)的李賀研究提供一些有益的借鑒。
[Abstract]:In the history of literature, the "genius" of Li He to "odd" known, his image of the poet and his poems as unique. Unique Western sinologists of Li He's poems spread out all sides of study, this paper attempts to do a global perspective, starting from the angle of culture and Western scholars and research methods, and make analysis and evaluation of their own research. First of all, through historical comparison, stephenowen interpretation of the unique image of the poet "Li He biography" in. The author focuses on stephenowen of "characteristics" understanding, discusses the rationality of stephenowen interpretation of the image of Li He. From the perspective of comparative literature, Chen Ying compares the life and poetic career of Keats and Li He, which is the first attempt to understand Li He in cross-cultural understanding. The author probes into the significance of Chen Ying's research in the sense of methodology and points out the shortcomings of it. In addition, Western Sinologists from the cultural point of view, the study of Li He poetry in myths, ghosts and the natural world, and from the religious perspective, life consciousness, the concept of nature aspects of different interpretation. Xue Aihua will examine the evolution of Li He's image in the literary goddess. Christensen will be in the poetry of Li He and Allan Poe's ghost image compared to death. Fttro de Shameem interpretation of Li He's life consciousness from the Buddhist perspective, stephenowen shift from the concept of natural interpretation of Li He's landscape. On the basis of the differences between Chinese and Western cultures, the author examines the new ideas of the western scholars' perspectives and views, and points out some of the misunderstandings. At the same time, based on the poetry of Li He Du Mu "is less than" the evaluation of "Li" in different understanding, Owen, and Lafule Krone respectively from the juxtaposition of poetry structure, unique imagery and symbolism of the end, the characteristics of Li He poetry launched on the wonderful. It is worth paying attention to the comparison between the different interpretations and versions of the text by western scholars. In addition, Robertson's quantitative study of Li He's words and Du Guoqing's analysis of the musical nature of Li He's poetry provided new ideas for the grasp of the artistic characteristics of Li He's poetry, but at the same time, the author also pointed out the limitations of their respective studies. This paper attempts to present the face of Li He studies in western academia, highlighting the research priorities and methods in western academia, and making necessary analysis, so as to provide some useful references for Li He research in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I207.22

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏靜;沈會祥;;再論李賀詩的“苦吟”[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年05期

2 楊穎;;本土與域外:不同視野下的“椒花”[J];中國典籍與文化;2011年03期

3 王晶;;李賀與愛倫·坡詩歌中死亡主題的比較[J];湖南醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

4 陳允吉;“牛鬼蛇神”與中唐韓孟盧李詩的荒幻意象[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1996年03期

5 林繼中;幻覺思維：李賀歌詩探秘[J];中州學(xué)刊;1996年02期

6 王玉民;李賀詩歌中的通感、幻覺和高峰體驗[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報;1996年01期

7 韓荔華;李賀詩歌用韻考察[J];北京第二外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;1994年06期

8 廖明君;;生命的渴望與理想——李賀游仙詩論[J];暨南學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué));1993年04期

9 孟修祥;李賀的變態(tài)心理與詩歌創(chuàng)作[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1990年03期

10 徐志嘯;兩個天才而又短命的浪漫詩人——論李賀與濟(jì)慈[J];中州學(xué)刊;1990年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李梅;浪漫主義視野中的李賀詩歌[D];中國海洋大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：1347162