基于產(chǎn)業(yè)周期階段劃分的三種上市公司并購方式選擇研究
[Abstract]:Through the study of enterprise performance in different industrial cycle stages, through empirical analysis, this paper finds out which M & A mode can improve the performance of enterprises in each industrial cycle stage. This paper first introduces the concept and related theories of M & A, and then introduces the research methods of M & A performance and the concept of enterprise industrial cycle. Then the possible relationship between different types of industries and different types of mergers and acquisitions is assumed. Next, the comprehensive evaluation index system of M & A performance of listed companies in China is established, and five dimensions and 10 indicators are established. Through principal component analysis and factor analysis of the financial data of 430 enterprises from 2005 to 2009 corresponding to the financial data from 2003 to 2011, it is concluded that the year before the merger and acquisition, and the year after the merger and acquisition, The comprehensive score of M & A performance in the two years after M & A. According to the classification of growth rate industry, the industries to which each enterprise belongs are divided into three categories: growth industry, mature industry and declining industry. In each type of industry, the enterprise performance of three kinds of M & A mode is analyzed and studied. In order to verify whether the hypothesis put forward in this paper is valid, and analyze the theoretical and practical reasons of the empirical results. The innovation of this paper is that the use of the latest enterprise data as research samples, for example, the 2011 annual report of the enterprise released in 2012, can be described as timeliness, but also can better reflect the reality of the problems studied. In addition, the concept of industrial cycle is introduced, which makes the relationship between industrial cycle and mergers and acquisitions established, and the results of the study have certain practical guiding significance for mergers and acquisitions. Finally, through the analysis of the empirical results, we summarize some conclusions of this paper, and analyze the shortcomings of this paper and the expectations of scholars in this field in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:F832.51;F271;F224
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鳳進(jìn),韋小柯;西方企業(yè)生命周期模型比較[J];商業(yè)研究;2003年07期
2 高燕燕;黃國良;;并購績效問題研究述評[J];山東工商學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期
3 余力,劉英;中國上市公司并購績效的實(shí)證分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2004年04期
4 王琪;金式容;;改善我國上市公司績效評價體系的探討[J];管理觀察;2009年06期
5 李繼志,李明賢;中國上市公司并購績效的實(shí)證研究[J];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年05期
6 韓立巖;陳慶勇;;并購的頻繁程度意味著什么——來自我國上市公司并購績效的證據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)(季刊);2007年04期
7 陳艷瑩;高東;;企業(yè)生命周期理論研究進(jìn)展述評[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2007年05期
8 馮根福,吳林江;我國上市公司并購績效的實(shí)證研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2001年01期
9 李善民,陳玉罡;上市公司兼并與收購的財富效應(yīng)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2002年11期
10 王敏;姜振萍;;上市公司績效評價指標(biāo)體系的建立[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2007年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 余紅濤;論中國經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型中的企業(yè)并購[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 趙勇;私營企業(yè)“借殼上市”的有效途徑探索來自資本市場的案例分析[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2000年
2 史銳;我國制造業(yè)上市公司并購績效的實(shí)證研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學(xué);2008年
本文編號:2478835
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/2478835.html