【摘要】：2011年,歐洲爆發(fā)主權(quán)債務(wù)危機(jī),股市連連受挫,但股指期貨等金融衍生產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)不但沒(méi)有萎縮,交易量反而再創(chuàng)新高,反映了金融動(dòng)蕩背景下市場(chǎng)對(duì)避險(xiǎn)需求的急劇增加,股指期貨對(duì)化解市場(chǎng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)起了積極作用。截至2012年4月,我國(guó)推出股指期貨已有兩年時(shí)問(wèn),滬深300指數(shù)期貨在我國(guó)開放式基金的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理中通過(guò)套期保值交易能發(fā)揮多大的作用以及如何更好地發(fā)揮作用,是一個(gè)值得研究的問(wèn)題。 本文正是在這樣的背景下在第三部分通過(guò)分析滬深300指數(shù)期貨的推出對(duì)我國(guó)開放式基金管理的意義以及滬深300指數(shù)期貨的運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀,說(shuō)明我國(guó)已經(jīng)具備了運(yùn)用股指期貨對(duì)開放式基金進(jìn)行套期保值的良好的市場(chǎng)基礎(chǔ)。第四部分在套期保值理論的基礎(chǔ)上采用滬深300指數(shù)期貨實(shí)際交易數(shù)據(jù)做實(shí)證分析,從而比較運(yùn)用靜態(tài)套期保值模型和動(dòng)態(tài)套期保值模型計(jì)算的最優(yōu)套期保值比率以及不同期限和不同樣本區(qū)間的保值績(jī)效,進(jìn)而發(fā)現(xiàn)在我國(guó)運(yùn)用股指期貨套期保值能規(guī)避大部分系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn),不同模型的套期保值效果差別不大,動(dòng)態(tài)套期保值策略不一定優(yōu)于靜態(tài)套期保值策略。第五第六部分分析我國(guó)開放式基金運(yùn)用股指期貨進(jìn)行套期保值的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及操作障礙,借鑒美國(guó)共同基金運(yùn)用股指期貨的經(jīng)驗(yàn),一是為我國(guó)開放式基金的管理者提供參考,二是為完善我國(guó)股指期貨套期保值交易機(jī)制提供建議。
[Abstract]:In 2011, the sovereign debt crisis broke out in Europe, and the stock market suffered a series of setbacks. However, the market for financial derivatives such as stock index futures did not shrink, but the volume of trading volume reached a new high again, reflecting the sharp increase in the demand for safe haven in the market against the backdrop of financial turmoil. Stock index futures played a positive role in defusing market risks. As of April 2012, it has been two years since the launch of stock index futures in China, asking how much the CSI 300 index futures can play through hedging transactions in the risk management of open-end funds in China and how to play a better role. It is a problem worth studying. In the third part, this paper analyzes the significance of the introduction of CSI 300 index futures to the management of open-end funds in China and the current operation of CSI 300 index futures. It shows that China already has a good market basis for hedging open-end funds by using stock index futures. In the fourth part, based on the theory of hedging, the actual trading data of Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index futures are used for empirical analysis. Thus, the optimal hedge ratio calculated by static hedging model and dynamic hedging model and the performance of different periods and sample intervals are compared. Furthermore, it is found that the use of stock index futures hedging can avoid most systemic risks in China, and the hedging effect of different models is not different, and dynamic hedging strategy is not necessarily superior to static hedging strategy. The fifth and sixth part analyzes the risks and operational obstacles of using stock index futures to hedge in China's open-end funds, and draws lessons from the experience of American mutual funds in using stock index futures. The first part is to provide reference for the managers of open-end funds in China. Second, to improve China's stock index futures hedging mechanism to provide advice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F832.51;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙志鵬;;美國(guó)股指期貨市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展及啟示[J];市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與價(jià)格;2010年09期

2 何明明;;股指期貨市場(chǎng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理:國(guó)際比較與啟示[J];南方金融;2010年07期

3 鄧?guó)Q茂;;股指期貨動(dòng)態(tài)套期保值率研究——基于DCC-MVGARCH模型[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2011年03期

4 朱志紅;王向榮;;股指期貨套期保值的實(shí)證研究[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年22期

5 楊浩;;滬深300股指期貨套期保值效果實(shí)證分析[J];金融經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年02期

6 楊夢(mèng)琪;;股指期貨套期保值策略及效果分析——滬深300股指期貨的模擬分析[J];金融經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年02期

7 李路苗;梁朝暉;;滬深300股指期貨最優(yōu)套期保值實(shí)證研究[J];華北金融;2010年01期

8 李傳峰;;機(jī)構(gòu)投資者股指期貨交易的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制研究[J];上海金融學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

9 付勝華;檀向球;;股指期貨套期保值研究及其實(shí)證分析[J];金融研究;2009年04期

10 張寅;;中國(guó)股指期貨的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)成因及防范機(jī)制——以宏觀層面的監(jiān)控為視角[J];江蘇工業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 廣發(fā)期貨投資研究部 方匡南;[N];期貨日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 長(zhǎng)城偉業(yè)期貨 張蕓蕓;[N];期貨日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

3 長(zhǎng)城偉業(yè)期貨研究所 張彬;[N];期貨日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2261143