發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-08 12:29

  本文選題：地方政府性債務(wù) + 政府治理績效　； 參考：《云南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：最近幾年,隨著地方政府性債務(wù)的總量和規(guī)模的不斷擴(kuò)大,對(duì)地方政府性債務(wù)的研究得到了重視。地方政府性債務(wù)是一把雙刃劍,一方面地方政府性債務(wù)可以帶動(dòng)地方經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,給地方政府以足夠的資金進(jìn)行地方基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè),提供更多的地方公共產(chǎn)品,有利于提高當(dāng)?shù)鼐用竦纳钯|(zhì)量；另一方面,如果地方政府性債務(wù)的總量和規(guī)模過大,就會(huì)加大地方政府性債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn),對(duì)地方政府治理績效具有潛在的負(fù)面影響。從理論上分析,地方政府性債務(wù)與地方政府治理績效有一定的關(guān)系,并且從地方政府性債務(wù)視角出發(fā)對(duì)政府治理績效的改善研究有其特殊性和獨(dú)到的意義。因此,本文分五個(gè)部分進(jìn)行寫作,從實(shí)證分析的角度針對(duì)地方政府性債務(wù)與地方政府治理績效的關(guān)系研究出發(fā),將文章重點(diǎn)放在如何從地方政府性債務(wù)的角度對(duì)政府治理績效的改善做出了研究。 本文從地方政府性債務(wù)和政府治理績效的狀況出發(fā),闡述了研究的背景和意義,分析了研究的內(nèi)容結(jié)構(gòu)、目的和方法及創(chuàng)新之處,還包括相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)綜述。通過分析地方政府性債務(wù)和政府治理績效的基本理論,綜合分析包括地方政府性債務(wù)的主要形式、形成原因、特點(diǎn)、基本情況以及政府性債務(wù)的綜合影響,地方政府治理績效管理現(xiàn)狀及地方政府治理績效評(píng)估存在的問題與不足等地方政府性債務(wù)與政府治理績效的基本狀況。為評(píng)價(jià)地方政府性債務(wù)及地方政府治理績效的指標(biāo)選擇及實(shí)證研究奠定了基礎(chǔ)。根據(jù)系統(tǒng)性原則、相關(guān)性原則、代表性原則、綜合性原則等選擇評(píng)價(jià)地方政府性債務(wù)和地方政府治理績效的指標(biāo),為了使分析更加準(zhǔn)確,對(duì)所選擇的指標(biāo)進(jìn)行主成分分析,運(yùn)用主成分對(duì)地方政府性債務(wù)和地方政府治理績效的關(guān)系進(jìn)行典型相關(guān)分析,并檢驗(yàn)典型相關(guān)系數(shù)的顯著性,進(jìn)而分析所得結(jié)果。最后文章根據(jù)實(shí)證分析的結(jié)果,從地方政府性債務(wù)角度分析提高地方政府治理績效的措施,主要包括加強(qiáng)地方政府性債務(wù)管理和建立高績效地方政府管理體系兩個(gè)大的方面。一方面,從加強(qiáng)地方政府性債務(wù)管理出發(fā),提出了地方政府應(yīng)該對(duì)地方政府性債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)進(jìn)行評(píng)估、構(gòu)建地方政府性債務(wù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)警機(jī)制、建立地方政府性債務(wù)管理體系；另一方面地方政府應(yīng)該從建立高績效地方政府管理體系出發(fā),提出了應(yīng)該完善地方政府績效考核指標(biāo),加強(qiáng)地方政府績效管理實(shí)施監(jiān)督并要建立合理的政府債務(wù)融資渠道等等。 通過本篇論文的寫作,根據(jù)研究結(jié)果并結(jié)合我國的實(shí)際情況,提出了從地方政府性債務(wù)的角度考慮的改善地方政府性治理績效的措施。一方面通過系統(tǒng)研究結(jié)果表明地方政府性債務(wù)與地方政府治理績效之間具有典型相關(guān)關(guān)系,使得地方政府性債務(wù)與地方政府治理績效更加緊密的相結(jié)合；另一方面,又在治理的視野中,從地方政府性債務(wù)的角度提出了政府提高地方政府治理績效的措施。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous expansion of the total amount and scale of local government debt, the study of local government debt has been paid attention to. Local government debt is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, local government debt can promote the development of local economy and provide local government with sufficient funds for local infrastructure construction. More local public products are conducive to improving the quality of life for local residents; on the other hand, if the total and large scale of local government debt is too large, it will increase the risk of local government debt and have a potential negative impact on the performance of local government. It has a certain relationship, and from the perspective of local government debt to the improvement of government governance performance improvement research has its special and unique significance. Therefore, this paper is divided into five parts to write, from the perspective of empirical analysis, focusing on the relationship between local government debt and local government governance performance. How to improve the performance of government governance from the perspective of local government debt?
Starting from the situation of local government debt and government governance performance, this paper expounds the background and significance of the research, analyzes the content structure, purpose, method and innovation of the research, and also includes relevant literature review. Through the analysis of the basic theories of local government debt and the performance of government performance, the comprehensive analysis includes local government. The main forms of debt, the cause of formation, the characteristics, the basic situation and the comprehensive influence of the government debt, the current situation of local government governance performance management and the existing problems and shortcomings of local government governance performance evaluation, and the basic status of local government debt and government governance performance. In order to make the analysis more accurate, in order to make the analysis more accurate, the principal component analysis is carried out and the principal component is applied to the local government debt, according to the system principle, the principle of relevance, the representative principle, the comprehensive principle and the index of the local government debt and the performance of local government. The relationship between administration and local government performance is analyzed in a canonical correlation analysis, and the significance of the canonical correlation coefficient is tested, and then the results are analyzed. Finally, according to the results of the empirical analysis, the paper analyzes the measures to improve the governance performance of local government from the perspective of local government debt, mainly including strengthening the management and establishment of local government debt. On the one hand, on the one hand, the local government debt management should be strengthened. On the one hand, the local government should evaluate the local government debt risk, construct the early warning mechanism of local government debt risk, establish the local government debt management system, and on the other hand, the local government should build the government debt management system. On the basis of the local government management system of high performance, it is suggested that the performance evaluation index of local government should be perfected, the implementation supervision of local government performance management should be strengthened, and a reasonable channel of government debt financing should be established.
According to the results of the study and the actual situation in China, this paper puts forward measures to improve the performance of local government governance from the perspective of local government debt. On the one hand, the results of systematic research show that there is a typical relationship between local government debt and local government performance. The government debt is more closely combined with the performance of local government. On the other hand, in the view of governance, the government measures to improve the government performance of local government from the perspective of local government debt.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F812.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 辛孝群;;地方政府績效評(píng)估:現(xiàn)狀、問題與路徑選擇[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

2 宓燕;;地方政府債務(wù)績效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2006年12期

3 王曉光;地方政府債務(wù)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)與控制[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2005年18期

4 倪星,李曉慶;試論政府績效評(píng)估的價(jià)值標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與指標(biāo)體系[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2004年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：2107439