本文選題：金磚國家 + 主權(quán)基金　； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：主權(quán)財(cái)富基金(Sovereign Wealth Funds,簡(jiǎn)稱SWF),是由主權(quán)國家建立和擁有的,主要用于境內(nèi)外長(zhǎng)期投資的國有金融資產(chǎn)。主權(quán)財(cái)富基金的資金來源于自然資源出口創(chuàng)匯,外匯儲(chǔ)備和財(cái)政盈余。由政府成立的專門投資機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行管理和運(yùn)作。金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金是近年來隨著金磚國家的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展而日益壯大,在國際金融舞臺(tái)初露端倪,是國際金融市場(chǎng)中的新生力量。對(duì)西方發(fā)達(dá)國家而言,金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金特殊的資金結(jié)構(gòu)、巨大的體量和不同的意識(shí)形態(tài),給其帶來了強(qiáng)烈的不安和猜疑。上世紀(jì)70年代開始形成的石油輸出國組織的巨額外匯盈余導(dǎo)致了國際金融體系的建立,1作為同樣來源于超剩外匯的主權(quán)財(cái)富基金,必然會(huì)對(duì)現(xiàn)行國際金融體系產(chǎn)生異曲同工的影響。如何解讀金磚國家主權(quán)基金對(duì)現(xiàn)有的國際金融體系帶來的沖擊,是嚴(yán)肅的政治課題。同時(shí),以在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化為背景,尋求金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金與西方國家合作模式,才達(dá)到“雙贏”效益,是無法避免的課題。本文在國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,綜合運(yùn)用國際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、外交學(xué)、統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)和經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)等相關(guān)學(xué)科的理論學(xué)說,試圖分析和揭示金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金和西方發(fā)達(dá)國家之間相互構(gòu)建“既競(jìng)又合”的合作博弈關(guān)系,并為金磚國家積極參與全球金融體系新秩序的建立提供理論上的探索和方法論上的研究。本文創(chuàng)新的觀點(diǎn)主要有：(1)用建構(gòu)主義理論,從文化角度對(duì)金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金和西方發(fā)達(dá)國家的合作進(jìn)行分析,金磚國家作為市場(chǎng)進(jìn)入的后來者,必須和當(dāng)今西方國家為主導(dǎo)的金融機(jī)構(gòu)、監(jiān)管單位和政治體系進(jìn)行互動(dòng)和溝通,金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金在現(xiàn)在和將來都不是全球金融體系的替代者或破壞者,而是合作者和建設(shè)者。(2)目前,由于西方發(fā)達(dá)國家和金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金之間信任機(jī)制缺失,金磚國家必須主動(dòng)在公司治理、透明度和投資戰(zhàn)略上與西方國家達(dá)成共識(shí),同時(shí),構(gòu)建金磚國家相互之間的互信機(jī)制,建立和西方發(fā)達(dá)國家整體性的對(duì)話機(jī)制。(3)金磚國家未來的出路在于其相互間內(nèi)部的緊密合作,減少金磚國家各自經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的不平衡狀況,從國家層面、市場(chǎng)層面和游戲規(guī)則上展開互補(bǔ),互惠的協(xié)同共進(jìn),并將金磚國家主權(quán)財(cái)富基金作為其對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)戰(zhàn)略升級(jí)的一部分,在全球經(jīng)濟(jì)新秩序的建立中獲得更多的話語權(quán)。
[Abstract]:Sovereign Wealth funds, established and owned by sovereign states, are mainly used for long-term investment in state-owned financial assets at home and abroad. Sovereign wealth funds are financed by export of natural resources, foreign exchange reserves and fiscal surpluses. It is managed and operated by a special investment agency set up by the government. The BRICS sovereign wealth fund is a new force in the international financial market. For the Western developed countries, the special funding structure, huge size and different ideologies of the BRICS sovereign wealth funds have given them a strong sense of unease and suspicion. The huge foreign exchange surplus of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting countries (OPEC), which began to form in the 1970s, led to the establishment of the international financial system as a sovereign wealth fund, also derived from excess foreign exchange. It is bound to have a similar impact on the current international financial system. How to interpret the impact of BRICS sovereign funds on the existing international financial system is a serious political issue. At the same time, in the context of economic globalization, it is inevitable to seek the cooperation model between BRICS sovereign wealth funds and Western countries to achieve "win-win" benefits. Based on the relevant research results at home and abroad, this paper synthetically applies the theories of international political economics, diplomacy, statistics and economics, etc. This paper attempts to analyze and reveal the cooperative game relationship between BRICS sovereign wealth funds and western developed countries. It also provides theoretical and methodological research for BRICS countries to participate in the establishment of a new global financial system. The main innovative ideas of this paper are: (1) using constructivism theory to analyze the cooperation between BRICS sovereign wealth funds and western developed countries from the perspective of culture, the BRICS countries as the latecomers of market entry. The BRICS Sovereign Wealth Fund is and will not be a substitute or destroyer for the global financial system, and must interact and communicate with the financial institutions, regulators and political systems that are dominated by the West today, and the BRICS sovereign wealth fund is and will not be a substitute for the global financial system. But collaborators and builders.) at present, due to the absence of a trust mechanism between the Western developed countries and the BRICS sovereign wealth funds, the BRICS countries must take the initiative to reach a consensus with the Western countries on corporate governance, transparency and investment strategies, and at the same time, The way forward for the BRICS countries lies in their close cooperation within each other to reduce the imbalance in their respective economic development. At the national level, the market level and the rules of the game are complementary, mutually beneficial and mutually beneficial, and the BRICS Sovereign Wealth Fund is included as part of the upgrading of its external economic strategy, In the establishment of a new global economic order to gain more voice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F831.5
，

本文編號(hào)：1930611