傳媒業(yè)上市公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)比較研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞:傳媒業(yè)上市公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)比較研究 出處:《山東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 傳媒業(yè) 上市公司 治理結(jié)構(gòu) 比較研究
【摘要】:為了改善我國傳媒產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)以及適應(yīng)國際傳媒產(chǎn)業(yè)的制度演變,提升傳媒業(yè)的國際競爭力,我國傳媒企業(yè)紛紛借鑒國外經(jīng)驗,采取控股以及參股等方式進(jìn)行資本運(yùn)作。公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)是現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度改革的關(guān)鍵,由于傳媒行業(yè)的特殊性,傳媒業(yè)上市公司改革進(jìn)程面臨多重壓力與挑戰(zhàn),政治力量與資本力量的結(jié)合、管理主體的多元化、盈利模式的單一化、產(chǎn)業(yè)智力和技術(shù)密集等特點,決定了傳媒業(yè)的治理結(jié)構(gòu)與一般行業(yè)相比顯著不同。傳媒業(yè)上市公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)一直是國內(nèi)外理論界和實務(wù)界的熱點,但是在眾多的研究當(dāng)中由于選擇的方法、樣本和指標(biāo)不同至今沒有一致的觀點。 本文采用規(guī)范研究、比較研究與實證研究相結(jié)合的方法,對我國傳媒上市公司與電力煤氣與水的供應(yīng)與生產(chǎn)、通訊服務(wù)、專業(yè)科技服務(wù)、計算機(jī)應(yīng)用服務(wù)等行業(yè)的上市公司股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)以及三會運(yùn)作、高管激勵等進(jìn)行了比較研究。 通過大樣本的比較研究發(fā)現(xiàn)具有嚴(yán)格政府監(jiān)管壟斷性質(zhì)以及以“輕資產(chǎn)”經(jīng)營為主的傳媒上市公司的治理結(jié)構(gòu)具有與其他行業(yè)顯著不同的特點。傳媒業(yè)上市公司呈現(xiàn)顯著的高度集中的股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)特征,第一大股東持股比例以及前五大股東的股權(quán)集中度顯著高于電力煤氣與水的生產(chǎn)供應(yīng)業(yè)、通信服務(wù)業(yè)和計算機(jī)應(yīng)用服務(wù)業(yè),但股權(quán)制衡度卻顯著低于以上對比行業(yè),表現(xiàn)為典型的行政型治理色彩。網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體、網(wǎng)游動漫等新興傳媒行業(yè)上市公司相對廣播電影電視、平面媒體等傳統(tǒng)傳媒行業(yè)上市公司,治理結(jié)構(gòu)較為完善,公司董監(jiān)事和高管的選任市場化程度高,激勵機(jī)制相對靈活。 根據(jù)相關(guān)的比較研究,本文認(rèn)為傳媒上市公司應(yīng)該從以下幾方面優(yōu)化其治理結(jié)構(gòu):傳媒整體上市、優(yōu)化股權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)與董事會規(guī)模、完善董事以及高管的激勵、完善獨(dú)立董事制度、強(qiáng)化監(jiān)事會的制度建設(shè)等。
[Abstract]:In order to improve our media industry structure and adapt to the evolution of the international media industry system, enhance the international competitiveness of the media industry, China's media enterprises have overseas experience, and taken to holding shares and other ways to carry out capital operation. Corporate governance structure is the key of modern enterprise system reform, because of the particularity of the media industry, the reform process of the media listed companies are facing multiple pressures and challenges, combined with political power and capital strength, management main body diversification, single profit model, industry intelligence and technology intensive characteristics, compared with the general industry determines the governance structure of the media industry is significantly different. The governance structure of listed companies has been the focus of the media industry and the theoretical circles at home and abroad but in practice, many of the study because of the methods, samples and indexes of different has no consistent point of view.
This paper adopts normative research method, comparative research and empirical research combined with the supply and production of Chinese media listed companies and electricity gas and water communication services, professional and technical services, the equity structure of Listed Companies in computer application services industries and will operate three, executive incentives were studied comparatively.
Through a comparative study of the large sample found with strict government regulation of monopoly nature and governance structure to "asset light" business oriented media companies and other industries are significantly different. The media industry listed companies show the highly concentrated ownership structure significantly and the characteristic of centralized production and supply of electricity gas and water was significantly higher than that of the proportion of the first largest shareholder and the top five shareholders' equity, communication services and computer application service industry, but the equity balance degree was significantly lower than the above comparison industry, as a typical administrative governance color. Network media, online animation and other emerging media companies relative radio film and television, print media and other traditional media industry listed companies, corporate governance structure more perfect, selection of market-oriented corporations and executives, incentive mechanism is relatively flexible.
According to the comparison of the relevant research, this paper considers from the following aspects to optimize the governance structure of listed media companies: the media should be listed as a whole, to optimize the ownership structure and the size of the board of directors, directors and executives to improve the incentive, improve the independent director system, strengthen the system construction of the board of supervisors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:G206;F832.51
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 郝云宏;任國良;;監(jiān)事會特征對上市公司高管變更影響的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)論叢;2010年04期
2 黃繼忠;陳素瓊;;電力行業(yè)上市公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)與公司績效關(guān)系的實證研究[J];財經(jīng)問題研究;2008年11期
3 李松林 ,趙曙光;透析中美上市媒介的激勵機(jī)制設(shè)計[J];傳媒觀察;2003年04期
4 姚偉峰;魯桐;;董事會建設(shè)與企業(yè)效率[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期
5 鄧正華;徐小立;;轉(zhuǎn)軌制度背景下傳媒企業(yè)公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)問題研究[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2007年13期
6 胡志勇;王首程;李祥偉;;我國傳媒上市公司經(jīng)營效績剖析[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期
7 魏安周;資本市場──中國傳媒產(chǎn)業(yè)化的必由之路[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2000年S2期
8 王硯書;武俠;于佳欣;;上市公司監(jiān)事會制度與經(jīng)營績效關(guān)系研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2009年11期
9 常永新;傳媒管制與傳媒集團(tuán)公司治理模式的構(gòu)建[J];南開管理評論;2003年01期
10 孔祥軍;傳媒業(yè)的企業(yè)化運(yùn)行與信用再造——現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度結(jié)構(gòu)的視野[J];新聞界;2003年02期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 文芳;胡玉明;;高管團(tuán)隊特征與企業(yè)R&D投資——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[A];中國會計學(xué)會2007年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集(下冊)[C];2007年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 郭富;基于價值創(chuàng)造的中國傳媒集團(tuán)管理研究[D];天津大學(xué);2004年
,本文編號:1410239
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/zhqtouz/1410239.html