【摘要】：在中國環(huán)境管制模式轉(zhuǎn)型問題上,主流理論給出的"藥方"是以多元共治模式作為替代選擇。這種思維的偏頗之處在于孤立又單純地討論"模式替代"而忽視模式內(nèi)部是否存在"自我進(jìn)階"的可能性。國家政治體制、制度特征和治理邏輯等政治因素對環(huán)境治理的深刻影響為研究提供了一個新視角。研究證明,在以合法性和有效性演變?yōu)楹诵牡膰抑卫磉壿嬒?中國環(huán)境管制模式"內(nèi)部取向"存在一條自我發(fā)展的軌跡,即從"控制"走向"激勵"。前者體現(xiàn)國家對自然、公眾與企業(yè)的控制,是在工具理性認(rèn)知下,確保秩序與穩(wěn)定、發(fā)揮"消極抑負(fù)"功效;后者則凸顯對自然的尊重、對公眾權(quán)利與企業(yè)利益的激勵,彰顯價值理性認(rèn)知,尋求秩序與表達(dá)兼容以及"積極增益"功效。繼而為進(jìn)一步促成"激勵"的完全進(jìn)階提供思路和建議。
[Abstract]:In the transformation of China's environmental control model, the "prescription" given by the mainstream theory is the multiple co-treatment model as an alternative. The bias of this kind of thinking lies in the isolated and simple discussion of "pattern substitution" while ignoring the possibility of "self-advancement" within the mode. The profound influence of political factors, such as national political system, institutional characteristics and governance logic, on environmental governance provides a new perspective for the study. The research proves that under the logic of governance with the core of legitimacy and effectiveness, there exists a self-development track in the "internal orientation" of China's environmental control model, that is, from "control" to "incentive". The former embodies the state's control over nature, the public and the enterprise, which ensures order and stability and exerts the effect of "negative suppression" under the understanding of instrumental rationality. The latter highlights the respect for nature, the encouragement of public rights and corporate interests, the rational cognition of value, the search for compatibility between order and expression, and the effectiveness of "positive gain". Then to further promote the "incentive" of the full level of ideas and suggestions.
【作者單位】： 中國海洋大學(xué)法政學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D630

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 胡威;;我國的政府管制模式分析[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2012年S4期

，

本文編號：2396635