【摘要】：AB研究院是承擔(dān)全省地質(zhì)勘查的公益性科研類事業(yè)單位,該單位目前面臨著市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)和企業(yè)內(nèi)部的雙重壓力,尤其是企業(yè)內(nèi)部的人力資源管理績(jī)效考核工作存在的諸多問(wèn)題。因此,急需科學(xué)合理的人力資源績(jī)效考核體系來(lái)促進(jìn)企業(yè)在管理上的改善。本文在現(xiàn)有相關(guān)績(jī)效研究的理論分析基礎(chǔ)上,選擇以AB研究院專業(yè)技術(shù)人員為研究對(duì)象,以關(guān)鍵績(jī)效考核指標(biāo)法為基本方法,結(jié)合層次分析法與專家調(diào)查法設(shè)計(jì)技術(shù)人員績(jī)效考核指標(biāo)及權(quán)重,并對(duì)AB研究院技術(shù)人員績(jī)效考核整個(gè)體系進(jìn)行研究。首先,本文在已有相關(guān)理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)緒論進(jìn)行了研究背景,研究意義,研究?jī)?nèi)容和方法等闡述;同時(shí),對(duì)相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行了收集、整理和分析,對(duì)績(jī)效考核的基本概念和考核指標(biāo)體系和方法等進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要概述;然后,本文對(duì)研究對(duì)象,即AB研究院進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單介紹以及對(duì)AB研究院專業(yè)技術(shù)人員的考核體系進(jìn)行了較為詳細(xì)的現(xiàn)狀分析;接著,本文在對(duì)AB研究院專業(yè)技術(shù)人員進(jìn)行工作分析以及相關(guān)理論和方法的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行了績(jī)效考核指標(biāo)的設(shè)計(jì),具體而言,利用關(guān)鍵業(yè)績(jī)考核指標(biāo)和專家調(diào)查法確定了考核指標(biāo),運(yùn)用層次分析法確定了相應(yīng)的權(quán)重系數(shù),并設(shè)定了評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn);接下來(lái),本文對(duì)考核方案和流程進(jìn)行了設(shè)計(jì)并提供了配套措施;文章最后對(duì)本文進(jìn)行了總體簡(jiǎn)要概述,并提出了研究不足。本文通過(guò)對(duì)AB研究院專業(yè)技術(shù)人員績(jī)效考核體系研究,希望通過(guò)對(duì)績(jī)效考核相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行分析,對(duì)AB研究院專業(yè)技術(shù)人員績(jī)效考核體系研究,以期對(duì)同行業(yè)技術(shù)人員績(jī)效考核提供理論與實(shí)際參考。并通過(guò)本研究能對(duì)AB研究院專業(yè)技術(shù)人員起到一定的激勵(lì)作用,使得AB研究院在技術(shù)方面能夠取得更大的進(jìn)步,獲得更好的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:AB Research Institute is a public welfare scientific research institution undertaking geological exploration in the whole province. At present, it is faced with the double pressure of market competition and enterprise interior, especially many problems existing in the performance appraisal of human resource management in enterprises. Therefore, scientific and reasonable human resource performance appraisal system is urgently needed to promote the improvement of enterprise management. On the basis of theoretical analysis of related performance research, this paper chooses the professional and technical personnel of AB Research Institute as the research object and the key performance evaluation index method as the basic method. Combined with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the expert investigation method, the index and the weight of the technical personnel performance appraisal are designed, and the whole system of the technical personnel performance appraisal in the AB Research Institute is studied. First of all, on the basis of the existing relevant theoretical research, through the introduction of the research background, research significance, research content and methods; at the same time, the relevant theories are collected, collated and analyzed. The basic concepts of performance appraisal and the evaluation index system and methods are briefly summarized. That is, the AB Research Institute made a brief introduction and a more detailed analysis of the examination system of the professional and technical personnel of the AB Research Institute. Based on the analysis of the work of the professional and technical personnel of the AB Academy and the related theories and methods, this paper designs the performance appraisal index. In particular, the key performance appraisal index and the expert investigation method are used to determine the evaluation index. Use AHP to determine the corresponding weight coefficient, and set a scoring standard; next, this paper designed the assessment scheme and process and provided supporting measures; finally, the article gave a general overview of the article, And put forward the insufficient research. Through the research on the performance appraisal system of the professional technical personnel of the AB Research Institute, this paper hopes to study the performance appraisal system of the professional technical personnel of the AB Research Institute by analyzing the relevant theories of the performance appraisal. In order to provide theoretical and practical reference for the same industry technical personnel performance appraisal. Through this research, the professional technicians of AB Research Institute can be encouraged, so that the AB Research Institute can make greater progress in technology and obtain better development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D630.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬飛飛;;基于平衡計(jì)分卡的企業(yè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系的構(gòu)建[J];財(cái)會(huì)學(xué)習(xí);2016年14期

2 李素瑩;;360度績(jī)效考核在企業(yè)中的有效應(yīng)用[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)與管理;2016年06期

3 陳瑩莉;;績(jī)效管理理論基礎(chǔ)的回顧與展望[J];人力資源管理;2015年05期

4 王亞玲;;我國(guó)科研事業(yè)單位績(jī)效考核現(xiàn)狀與績(jī)效工資激勵(lì)機(jī)制研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2013年19期

5 李新宏;;平衡計(jì)分卡在企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略管理中的應(yīng)用研究[J];管理觀察;2013年19期

6 盧亞群;;基于平衡計(jì)分卡的企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系研究[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2013年05期

7 陳宇瑾;;國(guó)有企業(yè)績(jī)效管理體系構(gòu)建[J];合作經(jīng)濟(jì)與科技;2012年19期

8 李志勤;;績(jī)效考核在人力資源管理中的應(yīng)用探討[J];經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者;2012年18期

9 徐國(guó)敏;;新形勢(shì)下科研事業(yè)單位績(jī)效考核問(wèn)題探析[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2011年24期

10 劉霞;;把握事業(yè)單位績(jī)效考核的特點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)衛(wèi)生人才;2011年09期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 聶會(huì)平;人力資源柔性及其對(duì)組織績(jī)效的作用研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

2 張金山;人力資本、薪酬制度與企業(yè)績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 于茜;基于KPI的R公司中層管理人員績(jī)效考核研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2015年

2 蘇鵬華;360度評(píng)估方法在ZHL企業(yè)績(jī)效考核中的應(yīng)用[D];長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué);2012年

3 李靜;新形勢(shì)下科研事業(yè)單位績(jī)效考核方案設(shè)計(jì)探析[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2011年

4 鄧華;基于戰(zhàn)略管理的高校教師績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)[D];重慶大學(xué);2008年

5 李晨光;QD研究院績(jī)效考核體系及薪酬激勵(lì)方案研究[D];哈爾濱工程大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：2232313