本文選題：國家治理 + 地方視角��； 參考：《甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報》2017年04期

【摘要】：國家治理除了具有整體性,也有其地方性。既有的學(xué)術(shù)話語提供了兩種類型的地方,分別是橫向區(qū)位意義的"地方"和縱向?qū)蛹壱饬x的"地方"。針對北方草原實施的草原政策,隨著從發(fā)展型話語向保護(hù)型話語的轉(zhuǎn)變,看似突出了地方主體,但這兩類草原政策的內(nèi)里都是"國家中心"的話語邏輯,其根源在于中國建立現(xiàn)代國家的歷程本來就是國家力量擠出橫向地方而建立縱向地方的過程,從而在事實上決定了地方知識并不具有獨立施展作用的空間。從規(guī)范的制度安排上看,地方政府或基層政權(quán)作為中央政府或整體國家在具體地方的代理人而具有自主性,但是從政權(quán)運行的邏輯上看,基層政權(quán)更多表現(xiàn)為服從性,尚不具有那種跟地方社會彼此嵌套、彼此咬合的地方自主性�；猱�(dāng)前圍繞草原政策所存在的政策辯論、促使地方知識進(jìn)入國家治理體系從而推助其現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程,不僅需要在研究話語上倡導(dǎo)"應(yīng)該重視地方性知識",還有賴于實現(xiàn)兩種"地方"及其各自蘊含的國家治理思維之間的轉(zhuǎn)換。
[Abstract]:In addition to the integrity of national governance, there are also its local. The existing academic discourse provides two types of places, namely "local" in horizontal location meaning and "local" in vertical level meaning. In view of the grassland policy implemented in the northern grassland, with the transformation from developmental discourse to protective discourse, it seems that the local subjects are prominent, but both of these two types of grassland policies are the discourse logic of "national center". Its origin lies in the process of establishing a modern state in China, which is a process in which the state forces squeeze out the horizontal place and establish the vertical place, which in fact determines the space in which local knowledge does not play an independent role. From the standardised system arrangement, the local government or the grassroots political power has the autonomy as the agent of the central government or the whole country in the specific place, but from the logic of the political power operation, the grass-roots government is more submissive. There is no local autonomy that nests and bites the local society. To resolve the current policy debate surrounding the grassland policy, to promote local knowledge into the national governance system and thus to promote its modernization process, It is necessary not only to advocate that "local knowledge should be attached importance to" in the research discourse, but also to realize the transformation between the two kinds of "local" and their respective national governance thinking.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目“邊疆民族地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)治理制度的現(xiàn)代意義研究”(16BZZ030)
【分類號】：D630

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 本報記者 李霞;草原退化區(qū)應(yīng)實行移民工程[N];內(nèi)蒙古日報(漢);2008年

2 孫瑞灼;草原萬人生態(tài)移民警示[N];農(nóng)民日報;2008年

3 全國政協(xié)委員 汪紀(jì)戎;解決草原過牧應(yīng)從清理非牧民養(yǎng)畜入手[N];人民政協(xié)報;2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李多慧;從游牧到定居生活方式的轉(zhuǎn)型研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：2042210