本文選題：城市企業(yè)主義 + 公私合作�。� 參考：《西南交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：福特主義發(fā)展體制追求標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化及全國性的平等發(fā)展,然而到了 1970年代,全球化發(fā)展趨勢出現(xiàn),在國民經(jīng)濟(jì)內(nèi)部繼續(xù)推進(jìn)平衡的城市化發(fā)展已不可行,再加上石油危機(jī)導(dǎo)致的工業(yè)衰退,失業(yè)率上升。國家為平衡落后區(qū)域的發(fā)展,再加上工業(yè)危機(jī)導(dǎo)致財(cái)政收入減少,國家縮減了城市發(fā)展的補(bǔ)貼。于是各城市為吸引資本投資建設(shè),快速改善城市落后面貌,一種競爭性的發(fā)展趨勢呈現(xiàn),貿(mào)易自由化、私有化和去除管制的要求得到加強(qiáng)。西歐國家政府開始更明確的目標(biāo)定位于主要的城市和城市區(qū)域,以提升國家經(jīng)濟(jì)的競爭力。中央權(quán)力下放,城市政府擁有更大的自主權(quán),公部門的資本滿足不了城市發(fā)展的資本需求,促使公部門轉(zhuǎn)向?qū)で笏讲块T的資本投資,然后一種公私合作的城市治理模式出現(xiàn)了。這種城市政府表現(xiàn)出企業(yè)家精神的治理模式,被學(xué)者稱之為“城市企業(yè)主義”。中國的改革開放與西歐國家的城市治理轉(zhuǎn)向幾乎發(fā)生與同一時(shí)期,因此,當(dāng)城市企業(yè)主義理念傳入中國時(shí),國內(nèi)學(xué)者做了相關(guān)的研究,在名稱翻譯和運(yùn)用上雖存在差異,但是對于核心理念的理解是一致的。在此背景下,本文對中西方關(guān)于城市企業(yè)主義的理解進(jìn)行了探討,研究了中國城市研究學(xué)者對城市企業(yè)主義的理解和認(rèn)識,總結(jié)出中國城市企業(yè)主義常見的發(fā)展策略:城市營銷、城市更新與舊城改造、開發(fā)區(qū)或新城空間的規(guī)劃。同時(shí),本文依托西方城市企業(yè)主義的理念,結(jié)合中國改革開放的背景,根據(jù)成都市發(fā)展的實(shí)際案例,對城市企業(yè)主義進(jìn)行深入分析和研究,以厘清城市企業(yè)主義治理模式的具體運(yùn)作思路。通過對成都市實(shí)際案例的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)城市企業(yè)主義治理模式在提升經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展能力和城市面貌的同時(shí),也產(chǎn)生了社會空間分化、公眾參與不足等問題。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者作了對應(yīng)的改進(jìn)措施。
[Abstract]:The development system of the Ford Doctrine pursued standardization and the equal development of the whole country. However, by the 1970s, the trend of globalization had emerged, and it was no longer feasible to continue to promote balanced urbanization within the national economy. Combined with the industrial recession caused by the oil crisis, unemployment rose. In order to balance the development of backward areas, and the industrial crisis resulting in reduced fiscal revenue, the state reduced subsidies for urban development. Therefore, in order to attract capital investment and quickly improve the backward appearance of cities, a competitive trend of development, trade liberalization, privatization and deregulation requirements have been strengthened. Western European governments have begun to target major cities and urban areas more clearly to improve the competitiveness of their economies. Central decentralization, greater autonomy of urban governments, public sector capital can not meet the capital needs of urban development, prompting the public sector to seek private sector capital investment, and then a public-private partnership of urban governance model emerged. This kind of urban government shows the management mode of entrepreneurship, which is called "urban enterprising" by scholars. China's reform and opening to the outside world and the turn of urban governance in Western European countries almost occurred in the same period. Therefore, when the concept of urban enterism was introduced into China, domestic scholars have made relevant studies, although there are differences in the translation and application of names. But the understanding of the core idea is consistent. In this context, this paper discusses the understanding of urban entrepreneurship between China and the West, and studies the understanding and understanding of urban entrepreneurship by Chinese urban researchers. This paper summarizes the common development strategies of Chinese urban entrepreneurship: urban marketing, urban renewal and old city transformation, planning of development zones or new city space. At the same time, based on the concept of western urban enterprising, combined with the background of China's reform and opening up, according to the actual case of Chengdu's development, this paper makes an in-depth analysis and research on urban enterprising. In order to clarify the specific operation of urban enterprise governance model. Through the analysis of the actual cases in Chengdu, it is found that the governance mode of urban enterism not only promotes the ability of economic development and the appearance of the city, but also produces some problems, such as the differentiation of social space and the insufficiency of public participation. On this basis, the author made corresponding improvement measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王麗梅;晏臘;;成都城市形象宣傳片符號文本解析[J];工業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)研究;2016年00期

2 劉潤;楊永春;王梅梅;金淑婷;張勝武;;轉(zhuǎn)型期中國城市更新背景下旅游地視覺景觀生產(chǎn)研究——以成都寬窄巷為例[J];人文地理;2016年03期

3 張勇;何深靜;;城市企業(yè)主義視角下的政府轉(zhuǎn)型——中部小城濟(jì)源的發(fā)展路徑[J];人文地理;2015年02期

4 李R，

本文編號：1931789