發(fā)布時間：2018-05-23 14:04

  本文選題：內(nèi)部文件 + 內(nèi)部管理信息�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：政府信息公開對保護知情權(quán)、促進民主政治、推進行政工作透明度、防止腐敗等具有深遠的意義�！吨腥A人民共和國政府信息公開條例》(文中簡稱《條例》)頒布以后,我國的政府信息公開工作取得了長足的進步,但也存在很多問題,尤其是行政機關(guān)常常以“內(nèi)部文件”為擋箭牌拒絕公開某些政府信息。所以本文試圖從申請內(nèi)部文件公開的訴訟案例出發(fā),結(jié)合法律法規(guī)和司法實踐,厘清內(nèi)部文件公開與不公開的邊界,并為審查內(nèi)部文件是否可以公開及公開的范圍提供思路。本文大致分為4個部分,第一部分引言首先對政府信息公開制度的內(nèi)容、主要原則、意義進行了簡要介紹,并引出本文的研究主題——內(nèi)部文件的審查研究。其次對相關(guān)的研究現(xiàn)狀進行了綜述與回顧,并對本文的寫作思路、方法和意義進行了概括。第二部分收集了3個申請內(nèi)部文件公開的經(jīng)典訴訟案例:《衛(wèi)某某與上海市浦東新區(qū)人民政府信息公開糾紛案》、《吳某某等訴杭州市人民政府不履行信息公開法定職責案》、《姚某某、劉某某等訴福建省永泰縣國土資源局案》。從這3個案例中,筆者歸納出內(nèi)部文件是否屬于政府信息、內(nèi)部文件是否屬于政府信息公開的例外事項、如何界定內(nèi)部文件可以公開的范圍這三個焦點問題,并總結(jié)了法院的審判邏輯。第三部分,對案例的爭議點進行了具體分析。首先,通過對內(nèi)部文件的內(nèi)涵分析,將內(nèi)部文件類型化為內(nèi)部管理信息、過程性信息和其他內(nèi)部信息,從信息公開的主體、本質(zhì)屬性、產(chǎn)生方式和形式要件這4方面展開分析,論證得出內(nèi)部文件應屬于廣義的政府信息。其次,位階較低的法規(guī)明確規(guī)定了內(nèi)部管理信息和過程性信息一般不應被公開。在司法實踐中,內(nèi)部管理信息常因無法律約束力、與公眾利益無關(guān)、公開可能妨礙行政職能的發(fā)揮而不予公開,過程性信息常因保障行政機關(guān)內(nèi)部自由交流和維護社會穩(wěn)定而不予公開,論證得出應把內(nèi)部文件視為信息公開的例外事項。但內(nèi)部文件并不是絕對不能公開的例外事項,需要結(jié)合不同的情況具體分析。所以,在第三部分的最后,筆者將內(nèi)部文件劃分成內(nèi)部管理信息、過程性信息、主觀性信息、客觀性信息這4種類型,并從這4方面對其可以公開的范圍進行了探索。第四部分,在第二、三部分的論證基礎上,提出審查內(nèi)部文件公開與不公開應遵循的原則和應把握的具體方法。審查內(nèi)部文件公開與不公開應遵循利益平衡和可分割性的原則。并從內(nèi)部文件是否存在、是否屬于政府信息、是否屬于可以公開的內(nèi)部管理信息范圍、是否屬于可以公開的過程性信息范圍、是否間接屬于“秘密條款”限制的情形、是否屬于“工作秘密”、“三安全一穩(wěn)定”限制的情形這6方面具體展開審查內(nèi)部文件公開與不公開的具體方法。
[Abstract]:The disclosure of government information is of far-reaching significance in protecting the right to know, promoting democratic politics, promoting the transparency of administrative work, preventing corruption, etc. After the promulgation of the regulations of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "regulations"), China's government information disclosure has made great progress, but there are also many problems, especially the administrative organs often use "internal documents" as a pretext to refuse to disclose some government information. Therefore, this paper tries to clarify the boundary between internal document disclosure and non-disclosure, and provide ideas for examining whether internal documents can be open and the scope of disclosure, starting from the litigation cases of applying for internal document disclosure, combining with laws, regulations and judicial practice. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the contents, main principles and significance of the government information disclosure system. Secondly, this paper summarizes and reviews the current research situation, and summarizes the ideas, methods and significance of this paper. The second part collects three classic litigation cases in which internal documents are made public: the dispute between Wei and the Pudong New District people's Government in Shanghai, the case of Wu and so on v. the Hangzhou Municipal people's Government for failing to perform its statutory duties of Information publicity, and the < Yao, so, and so on. Liu so and so on v. Fujian Yongtai County Land and Resources Bureau case. From these three cases, the author concludes whether internal documents belong to government information, whether internal documents are exceptions to the disclosure of government information, and how to define the scope within which internal documents can be made public. And summarized the trial logic of the court. The third part, has carried on the concrete analysis to the case dispute point. First of all, by analyzing the connotation of internal documents, the internal documents are classified into internal management information, process information and other internal information, which are analyzed from four aspects: the subject of information disclosure, the essential attribute, the way of producing and the formal elements. The conclusion is that internal documents should belong to the broad sense of government information. Second, lower-ranking regulations make it clear that internal management information and process information should not generally be made public. In judicial practice, internal management information is often closed because it is not legally binding and has nothing to do with the public interest. Process information is often not disclosed because of ensuring free communication within administrative organs and maintaining social stability. It is demonstrated that internal documents should be regarded as an exception to the disclosure of information. But internal documents are not an exception that can never be made public, and need to be analyzed in the light of different circumstances. At the end of the third part, the author divides the internal document into four types: internal management information, process information, subjective information and objective information. The fourth part, on the basis of argumentation in the second and third parts, puts forward the principles to be followed and the concrete methods to be grasped in reviewing the disclosure and non-disclosure of internal documents. Review of internal document disclosure and non-disclosure shall follow the principle of balance of interests and separability. And from the existence of internal documents, whether they belong to government information, whether they belong to the scope of internal management information that can be made public, whether they belong to the scope of procedural information that can be made public, and whether they are indirectly restricted by "secret clauses", Whether it is classified as "work secret", "three safety, one stability" restriction situation these six aspects of the specific review of internal documents open and closed specific methods.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D63

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 麥時雨;“三令五申”并非好事[J];民主與科學;1994年05期

2 知風;;“內(nèi)部文件”是不是單位招聘的“隱私”[J];人才資源開發(fā);2012年03期

3 張金川;;勿賣弄“知道得多”[J];黨的建設;1989年03期

4 王重陽;;企業(yè)文件的法律意義[J];農(nóng)電管理;2010年07期

5 劉林,江濤;遇到罰款怎么辦?[J];農(nóng)家顧問;2000年10期

6 ;評彈[J];法律與生活;2004年17期

7 吳江;;“患者須回頭”令人膽寒[J];法制與社會(銳視版);2008年02期

8 盛芳;;請筑起商業(yè)秘密的城墻!——商業(yè)秘密的刑法保護[J];廣東大經(jīng)貿(mào);1996年10期

9 ;新理論新觀點[J];求知;2001年07期

10 王建軍;;紅頭文件的缺陷[J];現(xiàn)代物業(yè);2005年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 苑廣闊;公招淘汰第一名,內(nèi)部文件說了算？[N];甘肅日報;2012年

2 肖華;“內(nèi)部文件”豈是違法的擋箭牌[N];嘉興日報;2012年

3 廖水南;有多少“內(nèi)部文件”不能見光[N];深圳商報;2012年

4 毛飛;“內(nèi)部文件”是法院行政化的產(chǎn)物[N];法制日報;2004年

5 新文;判決書咋成了“內(nèi)部文件”？[N];珠海特區(qū)報;2011年

6 潘俊強;“內(nèi)部文件”何時不再大行其道[N];人民日報;2012年

7 新華社記者 徐海濤 程士華;法院判決書怎成“內(nèi)部文件”?[N];新華每日電訊;2011年

8 嚴圣禾;日政府研討核武裝的文件曝光[N];光明日報;2006年

9 彌衡;上海圣奧被列為犯罪嫌疑人 3億元資金被凍結(jié)[N];第一財經(jīng)日報;2009年

10 李文璽;當事人在反傾銷程序中的知情權(quán)[N];國際商報;2002年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張瑩;政府信息公開訴訟中內(nèi)部文件的審查研究[D];西南政法大學;2015年

，

本文編號：1925046