發(fā)布時間：2018-05-10 09:01

  本文選題：社會組織 + 社區(qū)治理　； 參考：《青島大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟社會的進一步發(fā)展,原先單一的行政管理模式逐漸轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樯鐣嘣芾砟Ｊ健Ｉ鐣M織逐漸興起,并在社會治理中發(fā)揮著越來越重要的作用。我們應當充分發(fā)揮社會組織在社會治理中的這種輔助作用,實現(xiàn)社會治理模式由單一的政府治理向多元的政府治理、居民組織、社會組織三者合一的模式轉(zhuǎn)變。這種多元的社會治理模式有利于在全社會形成積極自主的社會氛圍和民主氛圍,解決社區(qū)改革中長久以來存在的活力不足的問題。這種三者合一的治理模式比起政府的單獨治理或者是完全的居民自治更具科學性。因為政府的單獨治理會導致居民產(chǎn)生懶惰的依賴心理,遇到問題只會譴責政府的失職;完全的居民自治容易產(chǎn)生“烏合之眾”的嚴重后果,在當前的社會發(fā)展中,居民的能力和素質(zhì)不足以對社區(qū)治理中的重重問題。促進居民自治與政府治理相結(jié)合,有利于促使社區(qū)治理的可能性大大增加,同時也提升了居民的相應行動能力和權(quán)責意識,也增強了公民性的建構(gòu)。本研究采用質(zhì)性案例研究,通過對選取的兩個社區(qū)進行調(diào)研,分別總結(jié)出社會管理和社會治理視角下社會組織參與社區(qū)治理的工作思路、路徑選擇,對其運作邏輯、治理效果進行了分析。調(diào)研后發(fā)現(xiàn),在實際的社區(qū)治理過程中,居委會作為社區(qū)治理的基層機構(gòu),往往發(fā)揮著主導作用。居民們?nèi)鄙倜裰鞯臎Q策與參與,居委會成為社區(qū)治理中的權(quán)威存在。我們所提倡的居民自治鼓勵居民在獨立、自主、民主的前提下參與社區(qū)治理,而不僅僅是服從權(quán)威。只有讓廣大居民參與到關(guān)乎自己切身利益的社區(qū)治理當中,才能夠構(gòu)建社區(qū)治理的和諧氛圍,建立起良性的社區(qū)“參與——互動”平臺,才能夠提高居民的民主意識、權(quán)利意識和責任意識。
[Abstract]:With the further development of economy and society, the former single administrative mode has gradually changed into the social pluralistic management model. The social organization rises gradually, and plays a more and more important role in the social governance. We should give full play to the auxiliary role of social organizations in social governance, and realize the transformation of social governance model from single government governance to pluralistic government governance, the integration of residents' organizations and social organizations. This pluralistic social governance model is conducive to the formation of a positive and independent social atmosphere and democratic atmosphere in the whole society, and to solve the problem of lack of vitality in community reform for a long time. This kind of three-in-one governance model is more scientific than the government alone or complete resident autonomy. This is because the individual governance of the government will cause residents to become lazy and dependent, and when they encounter problems, they will only condemn the government for failing in their duties. Full resident autonomy will easily lead to the serious consequences of the "mob", and in the current social development, The ability and quality of residents are not enough to deal with various problems in community governance. To promote the combination of residents' autonomy and government governance is conducive to greatly increase the possibility of community governance, at the same time to enhance the residents' corresponding ability of action and sense of power and responsibility, and also to strengthen the construction of citizenship. This study adopts qualitative case study, through the investigation of two selected communities, summarizes the social organization participation in community governance under the perspective of social management and social governance, the way to choose, the logic of its operation. The effect of governance is analyzed. After investigation, it is found that, in the process of community governance, neighborhood committees, as grass-roots organizations of community governance, often play a leading role. Residents lack democratic decision-making and participation, neighborhood committees become the authority in community governance. We advocate resident autonomy that encourages residents to participate in community governance on the basis of independence, autonomy and democracy, not just subdue authority. Only by allowing the residents to participate in the community governance which concerns their own vital interests, can we build a harmonious atmosphere of community governance, establish a benign platform of community participation and interaction, and enhance the democratic consciousness of the residents. Awareness of rights and responsibilities.
【學位授予單位】：青島大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D632.9;D669.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬全中;;中國社區(qū)治理研究:近期回顧與評析[J];新疆師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2017年02期

2 盧瑋靜;趙小平;張叢叢;;中國城市社區(qū)治理政策的困境、原因與對策——基于政策分析的視角[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2016年08期

3 吳素雄;陳字;吳艷;;社區(qū)社會組織提供公共服務的治理邏輯與結(jié)構(gòu)[J];中國行政管理;2015年02期

4 徐道穩(wěn);;社會基礎(chǔ)、制度環(huán)境和行政化陷阱——對深圳市社區(qū)治理體制的考察[J];人文雜志;2014年12期

5 李雪萍;曹朝龍;;社區(qū)社會組織與社區(qū)公共空間的生產(chǎn)[J];城市問題;2013年06期

6 唐文玉;;城市社區(qū)中的權(quán)威效能治理——基于T社區(qū)的個案研究[J];浙江社會科學;2013年04期

7 涂才江;;社區(qū)社會組織發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略思考[J];社團管理研究;2012年04期

8 吳素雄;楊華;;政府對社區(qū)社會組織培育的制度結(jié)構(gòu)與政策選擇——以浙江省杭州市為表述對象[J];湖北行政學院學報;2012年02期

9 文軍;;從單一被動到多元聯(lián)動——中國城市網(wǎng)格化社會管理模式的構(gòu)建與完善[J];學習與探索;2012年02期

10 鄭杭生;黃家亮;;論我國社區(qū)治理的雙重困境與創(chuàng)新之維——基于北京市社區(qū)管理體制改革實踐的分析[J];東岳論叢;2012年01期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 李慧鳳;社區(qū)治理與社會管理體制創(chuàng)新[D];浙江大學;2011年

2 任慧穎;非營利組織的社會行動與第三領(lǐng)域的建構(gòu)[D];上海大學;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 �？”�;沈陽市社會組織參與社區(qū)治理研究[D];遼寧大學;2011年

2 郭廣雷;上海市社會組織參與社區(qū)治理研究[D];華東師范大學;2009年

，

本文編號：1868684