本文選題：政策評估 + 制度構建　； 參考：《上海師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：政策評估在整個公共政策過程中起著重要的作用。政策評估作為一種對公共政策的效益、效率和價值進行綜合判斷與評價的政治行為,不僅是考量政策延續(xù)、改進和終止的重要依據(jù),而且還決定著政府部門的工作質(zhì)量和價值導向,并最終影響著公共資源的優(yōu)化配置方向和公共部門的良好社會形象。因此,政策評估的重要性不容忽視。從政策評估的重要性和西方政策評估的發(fā)展來看,政策評估的作用要得到充分發(fā)揮需要有制度作為保障�；谡咴u估系統(tǒng)構成的要素、“四代政策評估理論”以及西方發(fā)達國家建立政策評估制度的經(jīng)驗,本文認為政策評估制度應包括以下幾個方面:明確設立獨立的政策評估管理機構,明確多元的政策評估主體,明晰政策評估范圍,建立具有指導意義的政策評估指標體系,規(guī)范政策評估程序等。上海市閔行區(qū)于2012年出臺了《關于推行公共政策評估的實施辦法(試行)》,該《辦法》構建包括了評估組織、政策評估程序規(guī)范、政策評估指標體系等要素在內(nèi)的政策評估制度。上海市閔行區(qū)政策評估作為我國地方政府政策評估制度構建較為典型的案例,對于我國地方政府建立政策評估制度、推進我國政策評估工作有著重要的意義。因此,本文以上海市閔行區(qū)政策評估為案例,分析了政策評估制度的構建及運行情況,并指出其在政策評估制度構建中工作中存在的不足以及值得推廣和借鑒的做法。通過對該案例的研究分析,本文認為,完善閔行區(qū)的政策評估制度,需要有相關的法律法規(guī)作為保障,加強該項工作的權威性;要建立獨立的、專業(yè)的政策評估機構,以保證政策評估工作的獨立性和科學性;注重發(fā)展非政府的第三方評估機構,力求政策評估主體多元化,以保證政策評估的客觀性與公正性;著力推動政策中期與后期評估;積極構建科學、規(guī)范的政策評估理論與方法,以適應我國的政策評估實踐。
[Abstract]:Policy evaluation plays an important role in the whole process of public policy. Policy assessment, as a kind of political behavior that synthetically judges and evaluates the effectiveness, efficiency and value of public policies, is not only an important basis for considering the continuation, improvement and termination of policies. It also determines the work quality and value orientation of government departments, and ultimately affects the direction of the optimal allocation of public resources and the good social image of the public sector. Therefore, the importance of policy evaluation can not be ignored. From the view of the importance of policy evaluation and the development of western policy evaluation, the role of policy evaluation needs to be guaranteed by system if it is to be brought into full play. Based on the elements of the policy assessment system, the "four-generation policy evaluation theory" and the experience of the western developed countries in establishing the policy evaluation system, This paper holds that the policy evaluation system should include the following aspects: the establishment of an independent policy evaluation management body, a clear and pluralistic policy evaluation body, a clear policy evaluation scope, and a guiding policy evaluation index system. Standardize policy evaluation procedures, etc. In 2012, Minhang District of Shanghai issued "implementation measures on implementing Public Policy Evaluation (trial)", which constructed a policy evaluation system including evaluation organization, policy evaluation procedure, policy evaluation index system and so on. The policy evaluation of Minhang District in Shanghai is a typical case of the policy evaluation system of local government in our country. It is of great significance for the establishment of policy evaluation system and the promotion of policy evaluation in our country. Therefore, taking the policy evaluation of Minhang District in Shanghai as an example, this paper analyzes the construction and operation of the policy evaluation system, and points out its shortcomings in the construction of the policy evaluation system, as well as the practice that is worth popularizing and drawing lessons from. Through the study and analysis of this case, this paper holds that to perfect the policy evaluation system of Minhang District, we need to have relevant laws and regulations as the guarantee, strengthen the authority of this work, and establish independent and professional policy evaluation institutions. In order to ensure the independence and scientific nature of the policy evaluation work, pay attention to the development of non-governmental third-party evaluation institutions, strive to diversify the main body of policy evaluation to ensure the objectivity and impartiality of policy evaluation, and focus on the promotion of policy evaluation in the medium and late stages. To construct scientific and standardized theory and method of policy evaluation in order to adapt to the practice of policy evaluation in China.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 范柏乃;程宏偉;張莉;;韓國政府績效評估及其對中國的借鑒意義[J];公共管理學報;2006年02期

2 周建國;;政策評估中獨立第三方的邏輯、困境與出路[J];江海學刊;2009年06期

3 高雪蓮;;政策評價方法論的研究進展及其爭論[J];理論探討;2009年05期

4 肖遠軍，李春玲;政策評價概念探析[J];理論探討;1995年02期

5 陳世香;王笑含;;中國公共政策評估:回顧與展望[J];理論月刊;2009年09期

6 高富鋒;公共政策評估主體的缺陷及對策分析[J];求實;2004年S4期

7 吳建南,溫挺挺;政府績效立法分析:以美國《政府績效與結果法案》為例[J];中國行政管理;2004年09期

8 中國行政管理學會課題組;賈凌民;;政府公共政策績效評估研究[J];中國行政管理;2013年03期

9 王禮鑫;;我國公共政策評估制度的構建——基于閔行經(jīng)驗的思考[J];行政論壇;2015年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 李志軍 國務院發(fā)展研究中心技術經(jīng)濟研究部;[N];中國經(jīng)濟時報;2013年

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 董幼鴻;我國地方政府政策評估制度化建設研究[D];華東師范大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1849369