本文選題：濟度 + 田野研究��； 參考：《湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：正長期以來,無論政界或?qū)W界,對"道(教)門屬不屬于宗教""道(教)門是宗教還是邪教"此類問題的態(tài)度總是模棱兩可,變動不居。有關(guān)道(教)門性質(zhì)的各種界定,從晚清至今,紛繁復(fù)雜。如今,陳進國深入田野,走近宗教現(xiàn)場,通過搜集、分析豐富的民族志材料,為上述問題提供了一個思考方向。他在新書《救劫:當代濟度宗教的田野研究》(社會科學(xué)文獻出版社,2017。下稱《救劫》)開篇中,就對這一問題進行了回應(yīng):我們有必要掙脫思維定勢的束縛,使道(教)門回歸到"正�；�"的中國宗教譜
[Abstract]:For a long time, whether political or academic circles, the attitude of "Tao (religion) door is not a religion" or "Tao (religion) door is a religion or a cult" is always ambiguous and unchangeable. From the late Qing Dynasty to the present, various definitions of Taoist (religious) nature have been complicated. Now Chen Jinguo goes deep into the fields, approaches the religious scene, and through collecting and analyzing abundant ethnographic materials, provides a direction for thinking about the above problems. In his new book, "Rescue: a Field study of Contemporary Economic Religion." (Social Sciences Literature Press, 2017. In the opening part of the book, we respond to this question: it is necessary for us to break the shackles of thinking and return the Tao to the "normalization" of China's religious spectrum.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)佛教與宗教學(xué)理論研究所;
【分類號】：D635-5
，

本文編號：1830904