本文選題：公職人員　切入點：財產(chǎn)公開　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,中國反腐力度不斷加大,一大批腐敗官員被查處,“打老虎”、“拍蒼蠅”的舉措已實現(xiàn)常態(tài)化。同時,伴隨著中國共產(chǎn)風(fēng)黨內(nèi)紀(jì)律作風(fēng)的整頓,中國政治清明程度得到較大的提升。在此背景下,社會上對依靠制度反腐的呼聲迎來一次新的高漲。的確,只有落實到制度的建立上,才是反腐措施得以長久貫徹的出路。公職人員財產(chǎn)公開制度作為反腐敗系列制度的重要組成部分,在防止腐敗方面發(fā)揮獨特而不可忽視作用。該制度自200余年前在瑞典建立以來,己為世界大多數(shù)國家普遍接受,成為許多國家政府道德法的重要組成部分,關(guān)于財產(chǎn)公開的理論研究和制度實踐也不斷深入。但在中國,財產(chǎn)申報或公開由于存在諸多缺陷,難以稱得上是建立了真正的制度。公職人員財產(chǎn)公開制度較完備的國家首推美國。其制度實施效果較好,也成為世界國家參考的范本。亞洲的韓國、日本也建立了相同的制度,兩國與中國在地理位置上接近,社會文化方面存在諸多相似,因此其財產(chǎn)公開制度有很大的借鑒意義。通過對三國財產(chǎn)公開制度的建立過程、主要內(nèi)容和實施效果的詳細研究可見,成熟財產(chǎn)公開制度的實現(xiàn)是一個漸進的過程,它在立法上、理念上和技術(shù)上存在著諸多條件。本文對于中國建立公職人員財產(chǎn)公開制度的阻力,也從上述三個角度進行了分析。在立法上,現(xiàn)行財產(chǎn)公開停留在黨紀(jì)、政紀(jì)層面,諸多文件管轄范圍與效力交叉,制度立法還面臨著財產(chǎn)公開帶來的法的價值沖突；在理念上,來自傳統(tǒng)思想的阻滯與現(xiàn)實中面臨的倫理困境并存；在技術(shù)上,國家層面的相關(guān)規(guī)定在公開主體、內(nèi)容、種類、管理及責(zé)任、配套措施方面均不完善,與國外相比差距明顯。因此,本文借鑒美、韓、日三國在建立公職人員財產(chǎn)公開制度方面的有利經(jīng)驗,針對中國建立相同制度面臨的阻力,提出了一些對策建議。在法律層面,要理順諸多效力不等的規(guī)范性文件之間的關(guān)系,做好財產(chǎn)公開立法與諸多文件的銜接工作,還要權(quán)衡財產(chǎn)公開立法中公眾知情權(quán)與個人隱私權(quán)之間的沖突,力圖在二者之中找到最佳平衡點；在理念層面,要及時更新不合時宜的傳統(tǒng)思想,加強對公職人員的倫理教育,使財產(chǎn)公開內(nèi)化為公職人員的倫理行為；在技術(shù)層面,要參考域外完善的財產(chǎn)公開制度,同時照顧中國的社會和政治現(xiàn)實,擴大公開主體,細化公開內(nèi)容,增加公開種類,完善公開管理及責(zé)任,建立金融實名制等配套制度。中國正處于腐敗高發(fā)期,而中國近幾年的反腐力度也前所未有加大,此時正是順應(yīng)時勢、力推公職人員財產(chǎn)公開制度的良好時機。希望通過本文的一些研究,能為中國公職人員財產(chǎn)公開制度的建立起到推動作用。
[Abstract]:In recent years, China's anti-corruption efforts have been intensified, a large number of corrupt officials have been investigated and dealt with, and the measures of "fighting tigers" and "swatting flies" have been regularized. At the same time, with the rectification of the inner-party discipline style of the Communist Party of China, The degree of Chinese political Pure Brightness has been greatly improved. Against this background, the demand for relying on institutional anti-corruption in society has ushered in a new upsurge. Indeed, only the establishment of the system can be achieved. It is the only way out that anti-corruption measures can be carried out for a long time. As an important part of the anti-corruption system, the system of public property disclosure of public officials is an important part of the anti-corruption system. Having played a unique and undeniable role in the prevention of corruption. Since its establishment in Sweden more than 200 years ago, the system has been universally accepted by most countries of the world and has become an important part of the moral laws of many governments, The theoretical research and institutional practice on property disclosure are also deepening. However, in China, there are many defects in property declaration or disclosure. It is difficult to say that a real system has been established. The United States is the first country to have a more complete system of disclosure of public officials' property. The implementation of the system is better, and it has also become a model for the countries of the world. South Korea and Japan in Asia have also established the same system. The two countries are geographically close to China, and there are many similarities in social and cultural aspects, so their property disclosure system has great significance for reference. Through the establishment process of property disclosure system in the three countries, A detailed study of the main contents and implementation effects shows that the realization of the mature property disclosure system is a gradual process. There are many conditions in concept and technology. This paper also analyzes the resistance to the establishment of public property disclosure system in China from the above three angles. In legislation, the current property disclosure stays at the level of party discipline and government discipline. Many documents have overlapping jurisdiction and effectiveness, institutional legislation also faces the value conflict of the law brought about by property publicity; in the concept, the block from the traditional thought and the ethical dilemma in reality coexist; in the technology, the system legislation also faces the conflict of the value of the law brought about by the property publicity. The relevant regulations at the national level are not perfect in the aspects of public subject, content, category, management and responsibility, and supporting measures, which are obviously different from those of foreign countries. Therefore, this paper draws lessons from the United States, South Korea, The favorable experience of the three Japanese countries in establishing the public property disclosure system for public officials, in view of the resistance faced by China in establishing the same system, puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions. At the legal level, it is necessary to straighten out the relationship between many normative documents with varying effects. It is necessary to balance the conflict between the public right to know and the right to privacy in the legislation of property disclosure, and try to find the best balance between them. It is necessary to update the outdated traditional ideas in a timely manner, strengthen the ethical education of public officials, and internalize property disclosure into the ethical behavior of public officials; at the technical level, reference should be made to the perfect property disclosure system outside the country. At the same time, we should take care of China's social and political reality, expand the public subject, refine the open content, increase the variety of publicity, improve the open management and responsibility, and establish a supporting system such as the financial real-name system. China is in a period of high incidence of corruption. In recent years, China has also stepped up its anti-corruption efforts. This time is a good time to adapt to the current situation and push forward the system of property disclosure for public officials. I hope that through some research in this paper, It can promote the establishment of public property disclosure system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D630.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王科;曾棟梁;;論公職人員家庭財產(chǎn)公示制度的構(gòu)建[J];哈爾濱學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年12期

2 袁峰;;公職人員財產(chǎn)申報信息公示機制探析[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

3 詹紅巖;;試析我國公務(wù)員工資制度改革[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2009年03期

4 李翔宇;試論性善論的負(fù)面影響[J];社會科學(xué)家;2001年02期

5 劉植榮;;財產(chǎn)公示應(yīng)理直氣壯[J];人力資源;2013年02期

6 林蔚文;;公務(wù)員財產(chǎn)公示制度之迫切性暨可行性研究[J];廈門特區(qū)黨校學(xué)報;2013年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 郭林;[N];江蘇法制報;2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 崔海燕;中國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部財產(chǎn)申報制度構(gòu)建研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1685188