發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-26 13:54

  本文選題：民族認(rèn)同　切入點(diǎn)：國(guó)家認(rèn)同　出處：《中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在多民族的國(guó)家中,少數(shù)民族成員對(duì)本民族和國(guó)家的認(rèn)同關(guān)系到民族的發(fā)展和國(guó)家的安定團(tuán)結(jié)。本研究選擇內(nèi)蒙古青少年為研究對(duì)象,采用問卷調(diào)查法和訪談法收集一手資料,以試圖了解蒙古族青少年民族認(rèn)同與國(guó)家認(rèn)同的現(xiàn)狀、影響因素以及兩者之間具有怎樣的關(guān)系及其表現(xiàn)。通過對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)和訪談資料的分析發(fā)現(xiàn),首先,蒙古族青少年可以同時(shí)建立對(duì)民族和國(guó)家的兩種認(rèn)同,并且兩種認(rèn)同都能較高水平,民族認(rèn)同與國(guó)家認(rèn)同呈現(xiàn)微弱的負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系。其次,蒙古族青少年的民族認(rèn)同與國(guó)家認(rèn)同之間的關(guān)系呈現(xiàn)出“多元-倒金字塔型”的關(guān)系結(jié)構(gòu),具體表現(xiàn)為四類,即雙重認(rèn)同、“漢化”傾向、“民族主義”傾向和邊緣化。其中,雙重認(rèn)同占據(jù)主要地位。再次,蒙古族青少年的民族認(rèn)同與國(guó)家認(rèn)同表現(xiàn)為“外散-內(nèi)聚”的認(rèn)同模式,行為和認(rèn)知層面的漢化,并不影響在情感方面對(duì)民族的認(rèn)同。最后,影響因素分析的結(jié)果驗(yàn)證了建構(gòu)論的理論觀點(diǎn)。個(gè)體周圍的群體結(jié)構(gòu)類型可以影響其認(rèn)同的形成、維持和變化。通過對(duì)蒙古族青少年民族認(rèn)同與國(guó)家認(rèn)同的現(xiàn)狀、影響因素和關(guān)系的了解,對(duì)今后進(jìn)行民族教育與國(guó)家認(rèn)同教育提供一定的參考。
[Abstract]:In a multi-ethnic country, the identity of ethnic minority members to their own nationality and country is related to the development of the ethnic group and the stability and unity of the country. In this study, the adolescents of Inner Mongolia were selected as the research objects, and the primary data were collected by questionnaire survey and interview. In order to understand the current situation of Mongolian adolescents' national identity and national identity, the influencing factors and the relationship between them and their performance. First of all, through the analysis of the data and interview data, we find, Mongolian teenagers can establish both national and national identity at the same time, and both of them can be of a high level. National identity and national identity show a weak negative correlation. Secondly, The relationship between national identity and national identity of Mongolian youth presents a "plural-inverted pyramid" structure, which is manifested in four types, namely, double identity, "Sinicization", "nationalism" and marginalization. Thirdly, the national identity and national identity of Mongolian youth are characterized by "extraneous and cohesive" identity pattern, and the Sinicization of behavior and cognition does not affect the emotional identity of the nation. The results of factor analysis verify the theory of constructivism. The types of group structure around individuals can influence the formation, maintenance and change of their identity. The understanding of the influencing factors and relations provides some reference for the education of national identity and national identity in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D432.62;D633

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 史慧穎;張慶林;范豐慧;;西南地區(qū)少數(shù)民族大學(xué)生民族認(rèn)同心理研究[J];民族教育研究;2007年02期

2 王樂;;民族認(rèn)同與國(guó)家認(rèn)同的關(guān)系及其統(tǒng)一路徑研究[J];中共四川省委省級(jí)機(jī)關(guān)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2014年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 秦向榮;中國(guó)11至20歲青少年的民族認(rèn)同及其發(fā)展[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1668131