本文選題：昆曼公路 + 物流效率�。� 參考：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在“一帶一路”政策的倡導(dǎo)下,昆曼公路作為友誼通道、共贏通道,已經(jīng)把中國(guó)與東盟國(guó)家密切聯(lián)系在一起,共同發(fā)展。當(dāng)前,中國(guó)、老撾與泰國(guó)的大部分物流企業(yè)已經(jīng)意識(shí)到昆曼公路帶來(lái)的巨大商機(jī),云南普洱、景洪、磨憨、老撾會(huì)曬、泰國(guó)清盛、清萊、清邁等地均已有企業(yè)在公路站點(diǎn)附近建設(shè)物流貨場(chǎng)。昆曼公路沿線的國(guó)家或地區(qū)間貿(mào)易的大發(fā)展,物流需求規(guī)模的擴(kuò)大對(duì)社會(huì)物流服務(wù)水平的改善、效率的提高也提出了更新、更高的要求,因此昆曼公路物流效率測(cè)度研究將會(huì)有助于昆曼公路物流的大發(fā)展。本文閱讀相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)并結(jié)合問(wèn)卷調(diào)研,總結(jié)出昆曼公路物流發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀。在借鑒國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)昆曼公路評(píng)價(jià)研究理論和實(shí)踐成果的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)設(shè)計(jì)發(fā)放調(diào)查問(wèn)卷并對(duì)問(wèn)卷結(jié)果進(jìn)行信度分析、因子分析、效度分析,構(gòu)建關(guān)鍵因素評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。在此基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用層次分析法與模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合的數(shù)學(xué)方法進(jìn)行量化分析,并結(jié)合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果對(duì)優(yōu)化昆曼公路物流效率問(wèn)題提出建議。研究結(jié)論如下:(1)昆曼公路的物流供給不能滿足沿線國(guó)家或地區(qū)的物流需求,而最終有礙于昆曼公路物流行業(yè)高效率地發(fā)展并壯大,所以提升昆曼公路物流效率將是解決昆曼公路物流供需匹配問(wèn)題的根本所在;(2)昆曼公路物流效率的綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型由基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、物流信息化及政策、物流成本費(fèi)用、業(yè)務(wù)流程水平四個(gè)方面組成,并相應(yīng)選用公路基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、物流配套設(shè)施、服務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)覆蓋率、信息化水平、優(yōu)惠政策等一共18個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo),構(gòu)成整個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)體系;(3)昆曼公路物流效率的總體評(píng)分為2.2433分,屬于一般的等級(jí),偏向于物流效率一般,說(shuō)明昆曼公路物流效率水平有待提升;(4)所得評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果按照分值從低到高的排序分別物流成本費(fèi)用、業(yè)務(wù)流程水平、信息化水平及政策、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,而最低分值的物流成本費(fèi)用表明對(duì)昆曼公路物流效率的影響最大。
[Abstract]:Under the initiative of "Belt and Road" policy, the Kunman Highway, as a channel of friendship and win-win, has closely linked China with ASEAN countries and developed together. At present, most logistics enterprises in China, Laos and Thailand have realized the tremendous business opportunities brought about by the Kunman Highway. Yunnan Pu'er, Jinghong, Mohan, Laos will sun, Thailand's Qingsheng, Qinglai, Chiang Mai and other places have enterprises in the highway near the construction of logistics yard. The great development of trade between countries or regions along the Kunman Highway, the expansion of logistics demand scale, the improvement of social logistics service level and the improvement of efficiency also put forward new and higher requirements. Therefore, the study of Kunman highway logistics efficiency measurement will contribute to the development of Kunman highway logistics. This article reads the related literature and combines the questionnaire investigation, summarizes the Kunman highway logistics development present situation. Based on the theoretical and practical research results of Kunman highway evaluation at home and abroad, the reliability analysis, factor analysis and validity analysis of the questionnaire results are carried out by designing and issuing questionnaires, and the evaluation index system of key factors is constructed. On this basis, the quantitative analysis is carried out by using the mathematical method of AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and some suggestions on optimizing the efficiency of Kunman highway logistics are put forward in combination with the evaluation results. The conclusion of the study is as follows: 1) the logistics supply of the Kunman Highway cannot meet the logistics demand of the countries or regions along the route, but it will eventually hinder the development and expansion of the Kunman highway logistics industry in an efficient way. Therefore, improving the efficiency of Kunman highway logistics will be the fundamental solution to the problem of matching supply and demand of Kunman highway logistics.) the comprehensive evaluation model of Kunman highway logistics efficiency consists of infrastructure, logistics information and policy, logistics cost, etc. The business process level is composed of four aspects, and a total of 18 evaluation indicators, such as highway infrastructure, logistics supporting facilities, service network coverage, information level, preferential policies, etc., are selected accordingly. The overall score of Kunman highway logistics efficiency is 2.2433, which belongs to the general grade and tends to the general logistics efficiency. It shows that the evaluation results of Kunman highway logistics efficiency need to be improved in order of logistics cost, business process level, information level and policy, infrastructure, according to the score from low to high. The logistics cost of the lowest score indicates that Kunman road logistics efficiency is most affected.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F542.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈秋媛;沈麗;儀秀琴;;基于層次分析法的全面預(yù)算管理績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)——以MK公司為例[J];財(cái)會(huì)學(xué)習(xí);2014年11期

2 李忠民;夏德水;;我國(guó)絲綢之路經(jīng)濟(jì)帶物流設(shè)施效率分析——基于DEA模型的Malmqusit指數(shù)方法[J];西安財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

3 李桃迎;王慶偉;陳燕;靳志宏;;基于模糊聚類的我國(guó)主要港口物流效率分析[J];科學(xué)技術(shù)與工程;2014年23期

4 王勤;李南;;東盟互聯(lián)互通戰(zhàn)略及其實(shí)施成效[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年02期

5 李文韜;樊瑩;馮興艷;;APEC互聯(lián)互通問(wèn)題研究[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年02期

6 王琴梅;譚翠娥;;對(duì)西安市物流效率及其影響因素的實(shí)證研究——基于DEA模型和Tobit回歸模型的分析[J];軟科學(xué);2013年05期

7 周業(yè)旺;;基于DEA的武漢城市圈物流效率差異性比較分析[J];物流工程與管理;2012年10期

8 陳秀蓮;;中國(guó)—東盟運(yùn)輸服務(wù)貿(mào)易一體化的現(xiàn)狀、水平與發(fā)展前景[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2012年08期

9 王菲;;基于改進(jìn)型DEA的中國(guó)區(qū)域物流有效性比較研究[J];物流技術(shù);2012年13期

10 倪程程;;基于模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法的上海國(guó)際航運(yùn)中心物流效率分析[J];中國(guó)儲(chǔ)運(yùn);2012年07期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 田剛;中國(guó)物流業(yè)技術(shù)效率、技術(shù)進(jìn)步及其地區(qū)差異研究[D];南京航空航天大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 宋暉;昆曼公路建成后對(duì)云南經(jīng)濟(jì)影響[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1906034