本文關(guān)鍵詞：異性交友決策任務(wù)上為不同心理距離他人決策的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

異性交友決策任務(wù)上為不同心理距離他人決策的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好

Risk Preference in Making Romantic Relationship Decisions for Others with Different Psychological Distance

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

ZHANG Wei, LIU Yongfang, SUN Qingzhou, HU Qixu , LIU Yi （School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University; Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics

華東師范大學(xué)心理與認(rèn)知科學(xué)學(xué)院上海市腦功能基因組學(xué)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室,上海200062

文章摘要：使用中國文化背景下修訂的Beisswanger等人的異性交友決策問卷,采用2種方法操縱自我-他人心理距離,考察了男女大學(xué)生在后果嚴(yán)重性不同的異性交友決策任務(wù)上為不同心理距離他人決策風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好的差異。實(shí)驗(yàn)1發(fā)現(xiàn),被試為具體和籠統(tǒng)他人決策時(shí)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好無顯著差異,在后果不嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上比后果嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上更冒險(xiǎn),男性比女性更冒險(xiǎn)。心理距離與決策者性別的交互作用顯著：男性為具體他人決策更冒險(xiǎn),而女性為籠統(tǒng)他人決策更冒險(xiǎn)。實(shí)驗(yàn)2發(fā)現(xiàn),被試為不相似他人比為相似他人決策更冒險(xiǎn),在后果不嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上比在后果嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上更冒險(xiǎn),男性比女性更冒險(xiǎn)。后果嚴(yán)重性與決策者性別交互作用顯著：男性在后果嚴(yán)重和不嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好無顯著差異,而女性在后果不嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上比后果嚴(yán)重任務(wù)上更冒險(xiǎn)。綜合兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)的結(jié)果,可以得出以下結(jié)論：相對(duì)于具體和籠統(tǒng)他人的區(qū)分而言,相似和不相似他人的區(qū)分是一種更加穩(wěn)定和有效的區(qū)分自我-他人心理距離的方法。結(jié)合相關(guān)研究及理論對(duì)結(jié)果進(jìn)行了討論。

Abstr：Many studies have found self-other differences in decision making, but few studies have focused on the differences in decision making for different others. In fact, people often need to make decisions for different others in everyday life. In this study, two experiments were conducted to examine the differences in risk preference when people made decisions for others with different psychological distance. With the revised romantic relationship decision questionnaire （Beisswanger, Stone, Hupp, ＆ Allgaier, 2003） as a tool, Experiment 1 examined whether there were differences in risk preference when male and female participants made decisions for hypothetical specific others （friends） and abstract others （typical students） with either low or high life-impact scenarios. Experiment 2 examined whether there were differences in risk preference when male and female participants made decisions for similar others （with similar dispositional traits） and dissimilar others （with dissimilar dispositional traits）. The results of the two experiments showed that： （1） No significant difference in risk preference was observed between decisions for specific others and decisions for abstract others. However, male participants were more inclined to take risks when they made decisions for specific others than abstract others, whereas female participants did the opposite. （2） In contrast, participants were more risk taking when they made decisions for dissimilar others than for similar others. （3） Participants were more inclined to take risks in low life-impact scenarios than in high life-impact scenarios. （4） Male participants were more risk taking and less susceptible to life-impact manipulation than female participants. These results sug

文章關(guān)鍵詞：

Keyword：:romantic relationship decisions self-others differences in decision making psychological distance life-impact gender

課題項(xiàng)目：國家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目（31271112）資助

作者信息：會(huì)員可見

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：異性交友決策任務(wù)上為不同心理距離他人決策的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)偏好，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。