【摘要】：各級(jí)地方政府為加快推進(jìn)城市建設(shè)和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展,財(cái)政支出規(guī)模迅速擴(kuò)大,在原來(lái)地方政府財(cái)權(quán)與事權(quán)就不相匹配的情況下,形成了巨大的財(cái)政資金缺口。為繞開(kāi)各級(jí)地方政府不得作為融資主體的法律約束,“合法”地籌集大量資金,各地紛紛發(fā)展各類(lèi)地方政府投融資平臺(tái)。然而,由于融資規(guī)模大、監(jiān)管不到位以及其他體制機(jī)制因素影響,地方政府投融資平臺(tái)在發(fā)揮應(yīng)有作用的同時(shí),也產(chǎn)生了一系列負(fù)面問(wèn)題。因此,地方政府投融資平臺(tái)成為學(xué)界和政府都關(guān)注的研究熱點(diǎn)。本文研究認(rèn)為,地方政府投融資平臺(tái)作為名義上的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)主體,與其他經(jīng)營(yíng)性的以營(yíng)利為目的的經(jīng)濟(jì)主體是有本質(zhì)區(qū)別的,屬于特定目的公司的范疇。地方政府投融資平臺(tái)之所以在較短時(shí)間內(nèi)大量出現(xiàn),有其各方面的背景因素。經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)過(guò)度依賴(lài)投資驅(qū)動(dòng)、城市化進(jìn)程加快推進(jìn)、大量貨幣沉積以及經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境惡化、巨額國(guó)有資產(chǎn)的存在等構(gòu)成了投融資平臺(tái)出現(xiàn)的經(jīng)濟(jì)背景。同時(shí),財(cái)政分權(quán)與地方政府競(jìng)爭(zhēng)以及軟約束的預(yù)算制度形成了制度背景�！额A(yù)算法》、《擔(dān)保法》等法律法規(guī)在法律層面上對(duì)政府主體的一系列約束形成了催生投融資平臺(tái)產(chǎn)生的法律背景。全國(guó)各地在發(fā)展地方政府投融資平臺(tái)的過(guò)程中,相繼探索建立了各類(lèi)典型模式,并積累了成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)。本文簡(jiǎn)要討論了上海、重慶、天津等地的地方政府投融資平臺(tái)運(yùn)行模式,同時(shí)對(duì)平臺(tái)存在的主要問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析。本文認(rèn)為,由于地方政府投融資平臺(tái)存在的各種問(wèn)題,以及其本身出現(xiàn)所帶有的不得已性,其快速發(fā)展也必然帶來(lái)諸多負(fù)面影響。隨著投融資平臺(tái)的擴(kuò)張以及債務(wù)規(guī)模的擴(kuò)大,必然帶來(lái)資產(chǎn)泡沫加劇與通貨膨脹風(fēng)險(xiǎn),抑制民營(yíng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展活力,不利于完善市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制和我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí),同時(shí)間接推高房?jī)r(jià)造成民生壓力,最后還挑戰(zhàn)法律權(quán)威。在地方政府投融資平臺(tái)的發(fā)展過(guò)程中,中央政府的態(tài)度幾經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)折,很大程度上影響了平臺(tái)的發(fā)展或停滯。本文對(duì)中央政府歷年來(lái)對(duì)地方投融資平臺(tái)的宏觀政策進(jìn)行了總結(jié)分析,并提出了政策述評(píng)。在其基礎(chǔ)上,本文對(duì)規(guī)范地方政府投融資平臺(tái)發(fā)展提出了政策建議。本文認(rèn)為,短期來(lái)看,應(yīng)該盡快清理投融資平臺(tái)及其債務(wù),完善投融資平臺(tái)管理體系,建立健全法人治理結(jié)構(gòu),完善地方政府投融資活動(dòng)相關(guān)立法。長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,要著力改變經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)方式,推進(jìn)財(cái)稅體制改革和投融資體制改革,建立更加科學(xué)合理的黨政領(lǐng)導(dǎo)考核體系,并重建政府融資體系。
[Abstract]:In order to speed up urban construction and economic development, local governments at all levels have expanded the scale of fiscal expenditure rapidly. Under the circumstances that the original financial and administrative powers of local governments do not match, there is a huge gap in financial funds. In order to avoid the legal restriction that local governments at all levels cannot act as the main body of financing and raise a large amount of funds legally, various localities have developed various investment and financing platforms of local governments. However, due to the large scale of financing, inadequate supervision and other institutional and institutional factors, local government investment and financing platform not only play its due role, but also produce a series of negative problems. Therefore, local government investment and financing platform has become the focus of academic and government research. This paper argues that local government investment and financing platform, as a nominally market economy subject, is essentially different from other profit-making economic subjects, and belongs to the category of specific purpose company. Local government investment and financing platform in a relatively short period of time, there are various background factors. The economic background of investment and financing platform is the excessive dependence of economic growth on investment, the acceleration of urbanization, the deposition of a large amount of money and the deterioration of economic environment, and the existence of huge state-owned assets. At the same time, the budget system of fiscal decentralization and local government competition as well as soft constraints formed the institutional background. The legal background of the emergence of investment and financing platform is formed by a series of restrictions on the government subject by laws and regulations, such as the Law of guarantee and other laws and regulations on the legal level. In the process of developing local government investment and financing platform all over the country, various typical models have been explored and established one after another, and successful experiences have been accumulated. This paper briefly discusses the operation mode of local government investment and financing platform in Shanghai, Chongqing and Tianjin, and analyzes the main problems existing in the platform. This paper argues that the rapid development of local government investment and financing platform is bound to bring a lot of negative effects due to the various problems existing in the investment and financing platform of local government as well as the necessity of its own appearance. With the expansion of the investment and financing platform and the expansion of the debt scale, the asset bubble will inevitably increase and the risk of inflation will be increased, and the vitality of the private economy will be restrained. At the same time indirectly pushing up housing prices cause pressure on people's livelihood, and finally challenge the legal authority. In the process of the development of local government investment and financing platform, the attitude of the central government has changed several times, which greatly affected the development or stagnation of the platform. This paper summarizes and analyzes the macro-policies of the central government over the years to the local investment and financing platform, and puts forward a review of the policies. On the basis of it, this paper puts forward some policy suggestions to standardize the development of local government investment and financing platform. In the short term, we should clean up the investment and financing platform and its debt as soon as possible, perfect the management system of the investment and financing platform, establish and perfect the corporate governance structure, and perfect the relevant legislation of local government investment and financing activities. In the long run, we should make great efforts to change the way of economic growth, promote the reform of the fiscal and taxation system and the system of investment and financing, establish a more scientific and rational system of party and government leadership and assessment, and rebuild the system of government financing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F812.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 凌濤;借鑒日本成功經(jīng)驗(yàn) 建立財(cái)政投融資體系[J];金融科學(xué);1993年04期

2 鄭春;王安良;;試論以信托方式為政府投融資的全新模式[J];金融與經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年S1期

3 安洪海;韓秉勤;劉曉文;;深化地方政府投融資體制改革研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究參考;2011年65期

4 祝志勇;高揚(yáng)志;;財(cái)政壓力與官員政績(jī)的牽扯:細(xì)究地方政府投融資平臺(tái)[J];改革;2010年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2471147