環(huán)境稅、環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼與清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新:理論與經(jīng)驗(yàn)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-12-15 13:43
【摘要】:本文利用偏向性技術(shù)創(chuàng)新理論和上市公司數(shù)據(jù)實(shí)證研究了環(huán)境稅和環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼對我國清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響。理論模型研究表明,環(huán)境稅和環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼對清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響主要取決于清潔能源和化石能源的替代彈性。當(dāng)清潔能源和化石能源互補(bǔ)時(shí),環(huán)境稅會抑制清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼會促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,但對化石能源技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的作用更大。相反,當(dāng)清潔能源和化石能源相互替代時(shí),環(huán)境稅和環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼能夠促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,抑制化石能源技術(shù)創(chuàng)新。技術(shù)外溢降低了替代彈性的臨界點(diǎn),提高了環(huán)境稅和環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的效果。利用系統(tǒng)GMM和Tobit方法實(shí)證研究表明,我國目前的清潔能源和化石能源互補(bǔ),使得環(huán)境稅抑制了清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,環(huán)境補(bǔ)貼能夠促進(jìn)清潔技術(shù)創(chuàng)新,但效果較小。政府政策應(yīng)從全產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈角度擴(kuò)大清潔技術(shù)應(yīng)用范圍,提高清潔能源和化石能源的替代彈性。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the impact of environmental tax and environmental subsidy on clean technology innovation in China is studied by means of biased technology innovation theory and listed company data. Theoretical model studies show that the impact of environmental taxes and subsidies on clean technology innovation mainly depends on the alternative elasticity of clean energy and fossil energy. When clean energy and fossil energy complement each other, environmental tax will restrain clean technology innovation, environmental subsidy will promote clean technology innovation, but it will play a more important role in fossil energy technology innovation. On the contrary, when clean energy and fossil energy replace each other, environmental tax and environmental subsidy can promote clean technology innovation and inhibit fossil energy technology innovation. Technology spillover reduces the critical point of substitution elasticity and improves the effect of environmental tax and environmental subsidy to promote clean technology innovation. The empirical study of GMM and Tobit shows that the current clean energy and fossil energy complement each other in China, which makes the environmental tax restrain the innovation of clean technology, and the environmental subsidy can promote the innovation of clean technology, but the effect is relatively small. The government policy should expand the application range of clean technology from the angle of the whole industry chain and improve the elasticity of substitution of clean energy and fossil energy.
【作者單位】: 南京審計(jì)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與貿(mào)易學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究青年項(xiàng)目(15YJC790125) 國家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目(71573136)
【分類號】:F273.1;F812.45;X196
[Abstract]:In this paper, the impact of environmental tax and environmental subsidy on clean technology innovation in China is studied by means of biased technology innovation theory and listed company data. Theoretical model studies show that the impact of environmental taxes and subsidies on clean technology innovation mainly depends on the alternative elasticity of clean energy and fossil energy. When clean energy and fossil energy complement each other, environmental tax will restrain clean technology innovation, environmental subsidy will promote clean technology innovation, but it will play a more important role in fossil energy technology innovation. On the contrary, when clean energy and fossil energy replace each other, environmental tax and environmental subsidy can promote clean technology innovation and inhibit fossil energy technology innovation. Technology spillover reduces the critical point of substitution elasticity and improves the effect of environmental tax and environmental subsidy to promote clean technology innovation. The empirical study of GMM and Tobit shows that the current clean energy and fossil energy complement each other in China, which makes the environmental tax restrain the innovation of clean technology, and the environmental subsidy can promote the innovation of clean technology, but the effect is relatively small. The government policy should expand the application range of clean technology from the angle of the whole industry chain and improve the elasticity of substitution of clean energy and fossil energy.
【作者單位】: 南京審計(jì)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)與貿(mào)易學(xué)院;
【基金】:教育部人文社會科學(xué)研究青年項(xiàng)目(15YJC790125) 國家自然科學(xué)基金面上項(xiàng)目(71573136)
【分類號】:F273.1;F812.45;X196
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條
1 黎文靖;鄭曼妮;;實(shí)質(zhì)性創(chuàng)新還是策略性創(chuàng)新?——宏觀產(chǎn)業(yè)政策對微觀企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的影響[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2016年04期
2 王建民;楊文培;楊力;;雙贏目標(biāo)約束下中國能源結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整測算[J];中國人口·資源與環(huán)境;2016年03期
3 周亞虹;蒲余路;陳詩一;方芳;;政府扶持與新型產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展——以新能源為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年06期
4 張杰;翟福昕;周曉艷;;政府補(bǔ)貼、市場競爭與出口產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟(jì)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2015年04期
5 景維民;張璐;;環(huán)境管制、對外開放與中國工業(yè)的綠色技術(shù)進(jìn)步[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2014年09期
6 王杰;劉斌;;環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率——基于中國工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn)分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年03期
7 張成;陸e,
本文編號:2380752
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/guanlilunwen/shuishoucaizhenglunwen/2380752.html
最近更新
教材專著